The first row are derided by comicbook purists for not being accurate while the bottom two are considered the most comic accurate live action adaptations of their respective characters by purists.
So what is it Yea Forums? Which approach is better? Personally I find it funny that every new adaptation that gets praised for comic accuracy turns out to be mediocre.
Comic book purists only liked The Batman.
actually I liked all of those except bot right, and there are so many different interpretations of these old ass characters that have been written by hundreds of different people that it's a bit silly to say "comic book accurate"
What are you talking about? I haven't seen the batman movie yet but how is the new spiderman accurate to the comics when he was being mentored by iron man for the majority of the time?
I've not read any comicbooks(I've only seen the animated series) but is that all it is for Batman? The character seems painfully dull and the writing is juvenile. If The Batman is truer to the source material then I'd say Nolan and Bruce Timm did you guys a favor.
>when he was being mentored by iron man for the majority of the time?
Don't ask me. Ask the purists, from what I've observed the consensus is Tobey is the least accurate while Holland is the most accurate.
Based retard
Source? Hope you're not talking about Twitter "purists".
When they go for comic accurate they kill the movie
The bottom Spider-Man sucks shit and is the antithesis of what Spider-Man is about.
Nah, only the twitter crowd which obsesses over petty shit like Ra's being a literal immortal or Tobey having organic webshooters say the top row isn't comic accurate. They got the essence of these stories even if they ignored the minute details.
t. seething capeshit consoomer who has never read a comic in his life
Twittet, Yea Forums, forums like comicvine and plebbit.
You have no clue what you're talking about.
>Nolan
lel
>the consensus is Tobey is the least accurate
I blame the Ultimate for this.
Tobey is the most accurate representation of the 616 (prime, the first, the one and only) Peter Parker.
It's hardcore comicbook fans making these arguments big guy.
It's reddit faggots who started reading shit modern comics 5 years ago. The real comics are nothing like MCU trash.
>Tobey is the most accurate representation of the 616 (prime, the first, the one and only) Peter Parker.
Sorry user but thats Andrew
Spider-Man, maybe. Peter Parker, definitely not.
I read some recent comics and was surprised by how fagbait-y newer designs are. I don't remember Robin/Knightwing being this effeminate.
Copium.
You're retarded and your bait is shit OP
I'm glad Raimi basically just kept the soul of spider-man and nothing else. He told a great story while not caring about comic accuracy and it was all the better for it.
You're telling me that it's not the consensus among comicbook nerds that The Batman is the most comic accurate adaptation to date?
>how is the new spiderman accurate to the comics
Because the previous two incarnations were so far away from the comics that this one is considered extremely comic accurate just for getting closer than the others
What were the inaccuracies in Tobey's Spider-Man and what makes Holland closer?
kys
kys
I knew comicfags were full of shit when they bitched about organic webbing. It's way fucking cooler than the web shooters.
>Tobey is the most accurate representation of the 616
>Andrew is the most accurate representation of the 616
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH. No. Holland mogs them both quite easily in terms of being an accurate Peter and Spider-Man, maybe Tobey is the closest for most of the first half of his first movie but that's it.
kys kys
>muh accuracy
Tobey and the other jew were better Peters and spider-mans than Holland.
It has way better cinematic potential as well, as we saw in SM2.
>Holland mogs them both quite easily in terms of being an accurate Peter and Spider-Man,
how? i've only read 80s spidey comics and I don't see it.
Matter of the fact is Spider-Man has never properly been adapted on the big screen. Peter Parker is a dweeb who grows up to be a chad, and is never a pushover, doesn't let anyone run over him. You either get a Peter who's already a chad or a Peter who's always a dweeb.
Read older comics
Comic book accuracy is a meme argument used by marveltroons when DC releases its once in five years capekino. They said it about TDK, they said it about Joker and they're saying it about the batman. Guess what, the movie needs to be good and most western comics are pure shit
Why not make an original IP if you are embarrassed of the comics?
Because this way you can use what's good about the characters, discard what's shit and win european awards and fuck european sluts on a yatch in Ibiza while drinking champagne
>change means you're embarrassed
guess batman should look and act like he first did 80 years ago
>only good thing about Joker is his name
Bravo Nolan
That's not what he said retard. Nolan captured the essence of joker better than comic did, and he made him better.
Getting filtered by the likes of nolan and todd phillips isn't normal, please take care user we're worried
I like Noland I am just making fun of Philip's soulless Joker movie that is only popular because of Nolan
Three years seething at Joker being better than all MCU movies and winning awards marvel will never get, sounds like it's time to move on. Just get Phillips to direct a marvel movie if they don't know how to do it, bam problem solved
Enjoy all your soulless capeshit slop Yea Forums, you deserve it
Which runs did you read?
Idk about Spidey but The Batman is just adaptation of Batman Earth One which was shameless film setup by Geoff Johns. Yeah it did bring some element of Year One/Long Holloween but only unimportant snippets like catwoman being black
Only with SOVL you can have this kind of cultural impact however
I have read up to issue 700 of ASM alone nevermind all the spin off books user
If The Batman was a comic it would be the worlds shittiest Batman comic and everybody would clown it
>already forgotten
Comics are complete shit and always have been. The only comic series I’ve ever read that had any semblance of quality was Watchmen, and even then I found enjoyment in it unironically even though the author intended it to be a parody/satire.
Anything written by Stan Lee especially is literal spoonfed political propaganda with no sense of propaganda. He took Kirby and Ditko’s drawings and storylines, gave it all a Yiddish voice, and shoehorned in actual, undiluted propaganda.
>propaganda with no sense of propaganda
subtlety*
sorry lads I’m 11 hours into a 12 hour shift
>I can't even read a kid's book
lol no
>still coping
Kek Wagie. I 11 hours into a 12 hour shift of breeding all the hot women in your town.
Would it be worse than All Star Batman?
Kys NEET subhuman.