10 years from now this will be taught in film schools as the prime example of how NOT to remaster a master piece

>muh realism
movies aren't about experiencing reality. it's about telling a story.

realism stands the test of time

Looks like a PS3 cutscenes

I still haven't watched the 4k blu rays of LOTR, but I remember the blu rays had a fucking awful blue filter on them, or at least Fellowship did

reminds me of when autismos got mad they removed the green filter from the first Matrix film in the 4k remaster, when it was never actually in the original theatrical cut or the first DVD release but was a Lucas-tier revision for the blu ray

that's the opposite of the truth

give me one example where it doesn't

no

Bible movies

First one looks like mexico

If you think the bottom pic looks better then you have no soul.

the bottom is how it looked in the theater
the top is how the home releases looked
people have more history with that version

similar story with The Matrix

It really doesn't

Really? I do remember the movie being absolutely fucking amazing in the theatre though I can't remember the color though.

Why not release both

So you say the home release so superior

no he said the home release has the yellow mist, can you read?

The aggressive, muddy filter was never good. A color correction would be much appreciated.
But the second pic looks like an old video game where they slapped HDR on it and called it a day.

>le hazy atmospheric blur where I can't tell where the sun is coming from
No thanks

Fallout3 filter was kino

Apparently the 4ks have removed that awful blue filter

Top look like they're fighting in the desert and Sauron just dropped mustard gas on them

daily reminder that the remaster actually looks good, and to disregard any smartphone pic trying to "capture" HDR

Attached: LOTR1.jpg (3840x2160, 2.71M)

Attached: LOTR2.jpg (3840x2160, 2.63M)

no, it doesn't. It looks like hazy piss

Attached: LOTR3.jpg (3840x2160, 2.8M)

>muh piss filter

Attached: LOTR4.jpg (3840x2160, 2.06M)

>we're going to make everything yellow so the audience knows the scene takes place in Mexico

Attached: LOTR5.jpg (3840x2160, 2.24M)

>realism stands the test of time
okay give me 5 true films that were made in the 1930's that are treated as realistic classics then.

ngl remastered looks pretty tight

Literally SOULLESS, where is the artistic merit in this???

The first one itself already has a piss filter you idiot.

i gives it a dreamlike/magical feel which fits with lotr way more than that shitty overdetailed playstation cutscene below.

>doesn't have clear piss
Yikes

Attached: Screenshot (93).png (737x582, 742.28K)

true realism has never been done before...

>10 years from now this will be taught in film schools as the prime example of how NOT to remaster a master piece
They didn't learn from the matrix and they removed the filters.

>Where's the brown and bloom?

All the crack makes me dehydrated

>dreamlike/magical feel
riiiiight it totally doesn't look like thsit

Attached: 2006bloom.jpg (1493x806, 209.29K)

did they cgi his eyes blue in every scene when he wasn't wearing his contacts?

The second one is better your nigger
Fuck your shitty filters

woooow

Attached: fable-the-lost-chapters-20050627052520040.jpg (1024x819, 176.11K)

soul vs soulless

here's your epic soulful artistic merit kino sir

Attached: artistic merit.jpg (1980x1114, 363.38K)

Bottom looks more filmic, but neither look great.

youtube.com/watch?v=QgawC4Hkfug

why do people hate unrealistic colour correction now? My extended DVDs have the fantasy colour grading and I think it works fantastic. the 4K versions removed it and while they look truer to life I don’t necessarily think that improves the movies. I prefer the shire looking like a heightened fantasy location with vibrant colours

Attached: C70D8606-8E14-4D10-8235-073A7AF1A702.png (2062x2000, 55.83K)

dipping the filmrolls in piss is not "artistic"

lol its always been such a terrible decision to cast Agent Smith as the elf wtf were they thinking

>true to reality
Oh you live on Arda? Yeah shut the FUCK UP

Attached: 7ba43f5403d0a4bcd14d5eb59c221ed2.jpg (640x480, 35.33K)

fucking kek

The remaster actually looks good through a smartphone pic too, just don't have some garbage black friday chink TV/smartphone.

Attached: Aragorn.jpg (996x800, 171.81K)

Both of those images are photos taken from a fucking phone, of an uncalibrated tv screen. You're all low IQ

Attached: dsfsfsnnt.png (1920x1080, 1.97M)

What does that have to do with crack making me dehydrated

literally the opposite. the most stylised stuff ages better because it isn’t trying to look real, so dated effects etc don’t matter, it’s a unique reality that can’t really date because there’s nothing supplanting it are more real.

Yea Forums:
>nooooo you can’t put filter and bloom in your movies it has no sovl
also Yea Forums:
>nooooo you can’t remove the filter and bloom in your movies it has no sovl

...

i assume nigger, therefore low IQ

>didn't quote me even once
I accept your concessions realitycucks.

Bible movies are all classics that dated amazingly. Ten commandments is utter kino

That still has nothing to do with phones, dumbass

>Yea Forums is one person

also Yea Forums:
>is not one person

HDR photography minimizes bloom
go back to Yea Forums

based.
Most Ultra HD stuff is just upscales anyway

>definitely no hivemind here boys

Yes, my bad, I thought he was asking for non-realistic movies that stood the test of time.

This needs to be in 4x3 to maintain the director's vision

Honestly?
Good thing they don't remaster books.

all the events depicted happened

Attached: FBDBF998-D0F0-4C4D-9C30-C58F6B9B1409.jpg (1024x769, 97.1K)

Honestly?
I'm with you, just turn up the piss filter to eleven, drench everything in urine
Also add a shit filter on top of it, now this is high fantasy