>hyped up as Black Panther for white people
>flops
>immediately forgotten
What are the implications?
Hyped up as Black Panther for white people
>>hyped up as Black Panther for white people
that's where you are wrong, white people don't need a movie to confirm their values and emphasis their beliefs, not saying that they have better minds but they weren't cucked by activists such as Malcolm X who planted wrong ideas with good intentions that leads to the present day where black people are tribalistic and extremely closed minded.
black panther is just a sad parody
>hyped up as Black Panther for white people
Except it wasn't
This it isn't anything like black panther. It doesn't have white values its just another pozzed movie.
already coping hard
>See there are no black people!
>I know she has so much botox she looks like a bog bro but Nicole Kidman is white!!
>>hyped up as Black Panther for white people
that was Joker
How is it pozzed?
If Northman had been highly successful, there would be 20 threads of it on Yea Forums at all times. Thankfully we have been saved from such a terrible fate.
Uhh this is a history movie, Black Panther is fiction. To answer your question, R-rated history films don't make money anymore.
The fact that it is flopping shows that cinema as art is doomed. Fucking zoomers and their pysoped attention spans only fit for tik tok. We need to begin drafting people.
Even before release, I wrote here on Yea Forums that it will flop, because of the Skarsgard. He flopped Tarzan too. He is not the model white male anyway. I am surprised Hollywood studios haven’t learned from their own mistakes.
I am surprised it is not a parody or comedy.
1080p when
Malcolm X did nothing wrong. He's the most based Black man to ever live.
it's going to be massive on streaming and torrents. Still, a financial turbobomb.
>flop
Nice buzz word. The Northman will be remembered as kino in decades and all your moneycow capeshit will be consigned to the dustbins of history.
No, he was a dumbass nigger who got scammed by a literal autistic pedophile LARPer, and he only redeemed himself right before he got killed by him.
Northman isn't entertaining, Black Panther was. that's the key difference.
>kept preaching false religion for 15 years
you should read about his burial, he was buried 4 times because nobody in NYC knew real Islam values, instead they've all been brainwashed by NOI.
malcolm x is charismatic and enthusiastic but his ideas were extremely fucked hence why i said "wrong ideas with good intentions"
It flopped, you stupid male cunt.
He's still based.
He hasn't seen it
>movie flops like a motherfucker
>IT'S AKCHYUALLY POZZED AS FUCK
LMAO
>We need to begin drafting people.
WE GET IT, STFU.
>flick vs an R rated movie
they aren't even comparable, this thread is retarded.
X wanted Blacks and Whites to separate from each other. Is that not what we want?
it's not a history movie. It's a made up story with fantasy elements.
Keep seething browncel
He was based for 1/1000 of his life and the rest was cringe.
wanted, meaning that he changed his mind later in 1965 and no i don't believe in segregation.
Why is this being spammed? What d-tier discord is this coming from?
Why don't you believe in speration?
Keep envying big black dicks, little white cunt.
regular people dont like Eggers movies in general, every single one of his movies gets like 2 points below the critics reviews from people.
i do agree the Northman isnt as good as the witch and the lighthouse tho
He was based. When he changed his views he became cringe.
There's 100% a discord either full of troons (probably) or less likely angry brown skins who for obvious reasons want to take down the reputation of this film by pointing out that it didn't break even at the box office. What they don't seem to comprehend is only dogshit low IQ films these days actually make money.
>movie hyped by (((unbiased news sources))) as some epik whyte phantassy
>spends the entire movie showing how evil and bad white people are on purpose to try and get white people to either hate their ancestry or emulate this parody of it
>movie is just bland and boring so no one sees it
whoops!
the implication is you're a simple little person with simple little ideas. No surprise you're referencing capeshit.
> Pretending it wasn't talked up just that way in Yea Forums for months
Oh you!
I'm humbled you think Yea Forums has that much marketing power. Jesus Christ, do you people even listen to yourselves?
>regular people dont like Eggers movies in general
the vvitch is one of the most liked normie horrors in the last decade
>muh dik
We don't need a movie. We have being white.
>human sacrifice
>history
Um
Yeah being 60 IQ and believing in Yakub the big head scientist is based, sure.
Not on their terms though
Vikings practiced human sacrifice.
Imagine if Black Panther had human sacrifice, psychedelic drug use, and a civilization of low-iq murderous raping barbarians fighting each other naked
What do you believe in?
jewrat pedophiles have destroyed the industry to the point where if you’re not putting big capeshit up you’re not gonna make money. simple as.
Not him, but you obviously struggle with read comprehension
Post irrefutable archaeological evidence. You won’t be able to.
it had Dan Kaluuya riding a Rhino, though.
i liked the acting of the uncle. had to look him up and found nothing at all worth watching. i hate netflix and i hate scandinavia
Yea Forums talking the movie up doesn't even come close to the scale of the hype for Black Panther. His post wasn't a gotcha like he thought.
>>spends the entire movie showing how evil and bad white people are on purpose to try and get white people to either hate their ancestry
Well, no. I'm English, I have nothing in common with those illiterate barbarian savages. I'm glad that it's finally being told how subhuman scandis are. Too long have the lefties been sucking off Sweden and Norway. Its time the world knew that they were basically white niggers until they were first, christened and then anglicised by cultural contamination.
If you identify as a viking as a white person youre unironically a nigger.
The Romans said so, or something.
The Arabs said so, and they had writing at the time.
>i liked the acting of the uncle
you mean Claes Bang? Dracula is kino. Square is kino. Affair is kino - though he came later on.
The Arabs have always struck me as liars.
>At Trelleborg a sacrificial site was found from the time before the Viking fortress was erected in 980-81. In five c. 3 metre-deep wells human and animal skeletons were found, together with jewellery and tools. Of the total of five human sacrifices, four were young children aged between 4 and 7.
What about Germans?
There are several horrifying accounts of human sacrifices from the Viking period. The German bishop, Thietmar of Merseburg, describes how the Vikings met every nine years at Lejre on Zealand in January “and offer to their gods 99 people and just as many horses, dogs and hens or hawks, for these should serve them in the kingdom of the dead and atone for their evil deeds.”
The German monk Adam of Bremen wrote a similar account in 1072 about the sacrificial tradition at Gammel Uppsala in Sweden, where the temple was devoted to Thor, Odin and Frey. Here the Vikings also met every 9 years to ensure the goodwill of the gods. 9 males of all kinds of living creatures were sacrificed in a holy grove nearby. According to Adam of Bremen dogs, horses and humans hung from the trees. The number 9 was apparently of magical significance to the Vikings and was involved in a number of rituals.
Link to the camrip?