My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined

My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined.

Attached: 1644797836992.jpg (1080x1349, 435.79K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VLnYPXTs9LY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lashana_Lynch
twitter.com/AnonBabble

RDJ's Endgame contract said that nobody else can play Iron Man, so I don't know what you guys were expecting.

Kinda feels like this is containment. It won't matter if the movie sucks. There have been good movies that got leaked and they did well because people liked them and they were good.

If this is another Eternals or NWH you're fucked.

Next time baby
youtube.com/watch?v=VLnYPXTs9LY

Attached: bf3397cea4120796b4b3eba00362c0cc.jpg (541x403, 55.09K)

I wish fags were this based again

.........who gives a rotting rat's ass.......

t. panicking disneed employee

>RDJ's Endgame contract said that nobody else can play Iron Man
I don't believe you.

can someone post the leaks pls?

would be cool if there was a Tom Cruise Iron Man in Dr Strange Multiverse

I agree, sounds like bullshit, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was more that no one could play his version of tony stark

There was never a hint or shred of evidence that he was going to be in the movie. This was completely a fan made rumor that fans kept building up in their heads until they just expected it to be a reality. You faggot losers do this with every new capeshit. I will fault Disney a little bit tho for not just coming out and squashing this rumor in its tracks.

I do.

Also: Knock this shit off. We're here to discuss kinos. If you don't like it don't enter the fucking thread, you fucking child.

>RDJ's Endgame contract said that nobody else can play Iron Man, so I don't know what you guys were expecting.


what a cunt. this is why i hate jews. well one of a thousand reasons.

>it doesn't need Iron Man

Attached: siiiiiiiiip.jpg (1065x672, 199.54K)

Is he going to Jim the camera?

That makes a little more sense. Essentially it would prevent Disney or Marvel to pull a Don Cheadle or a Mark Ruffalo on him.

its retarded and a shit on the fans though.
>dude we cant have 007 james bond anymore.... daniel craig said no more bonds but him.

Explain to me the logic of how a shill would be saying what I said. A shill would say something like
>Who cares about tom.crjise I'm still hype yolo

War Machine was miscast. He is supposed to be this big badass nigger who doesn't afraid of anything.
Don Sneedl just kind of stands there and exists..

Attached: RCO005_1649213090.jpg (3953x3056, 3.09M)

ruffalo was more so

Next time laddie

Attached: 129e1ef9ce8df3151978a257819db6fc.jpg (800x1200, 62.37K)

I think the idea is they couldn't cast someone else as Iron Man but have everyone pretend it's the same person that RDJ was playing. Like how they replaced Terrence Howard with Don Cheadle and Edward Norton with Mark Ruffalo. But since Iron Man died I don't really see why they'd need to make it contractually binding anyway. The only way they could do that is if they literally brought Iron Man back to life somehow but then not have be played by RDJ.

That's bullshit. The closest to truth that would be is you can't use his likeness which means you can't use his filmed parts in flashbacks or dreams and you can't use photos. The rights are owned by Disney. They can do whatever the fuck they want with the character, and I'm guessing the film and likeness of the MCU character as well. He'd have to get paid, of course, which is probably a lot. Downey can't just claim Iron Man and Disney sure as fuck isn't giving it away in a contract to an actor, lmfao
Who the fuck believes something so stupid?

Attached: 1646880839204.jpg (828x814, 423.14K)

I agree that's stupid. And that's how understood it as well when they first guy wrote it.
But I don't see why you think it's more likely that he somehow is able to dictate how Disney uses the work he has already done than it is for him to have his character work protected.
I don't believe this would ever happen because I don't think any fans would accept this but let's say one of the current MCU character does time travel shenanigans. Do you think it's unreasonable for RDJ to have a contractual clause that says you can't have someone else play his exact character? I don't mean some sort of parallel/alternative universe version of the character. But literally him from the past.
I could see Disney giving him that, since they probably never would never do that anyway.

Why would they do that? The entire plan for the MCU initially was just to James Bond style recast everyone, they already had someone else play him in What If...?

>The entire plan for the MCU initially was just to James Bond style recast everyone
I never heard that.
Before Daniel Craig James Bond had no real continuity. M might have been played by the same actress but it was understood that Daniel Craig was a different character than Pierce Brosnan, even though both characters were called James Bond.
>they already had someone else play him in What If...?
I didn't even know that was a thing but it seems pretty self explanatory. What if... things were different? I'm assuming whatever characters they have there are either played by the same people but are very different characters or they have different people play characters that were played by someone else which also changes the character in some significant way. Or am I wrong?

Specifically it says that there will be no other live action Tony Stark/Iron Man in the MCU besides RDJ (unless he agrees to it). Why wouldn't Disney agree to it? He's already out of the franchise.

>And that's how understood it as well when they first guy wrote it.
I don't understand this line. Retry please.
>work he has already done
He'd have to get paid. That's all I said. ""They can do whatever the fuck they want with the character, and I'm guessing the film and likeness of the MCU character as well.""

I do think it would be unreasonable for him to even attempt to request that Disney do/do not do something with "his character" because it isn't his. As for your question:
>Do you think it's unreasonable
Yes. It's ludicrous for him to even think about asking that. It isn't how any of it works. Disney asked him to play a character for money. He did. They paid him. Their contract is complete. He does not own the footage or the rights to the character. He owns the rights to his face. If they use his face he gets a cut. That's it.

Disney isn't bringing Tony Stank back (permanently). At least not our RDJ version. Not any time soon. They've said so repeatedly. It would diminish the RDJ movies retroactively.

>entire plan
Bullshit. STFU

Keep coping chuds

Attached: recast.png (996x907, 304.69K)

So how are they gonna tell a new Iron Man story in the mainline MCU with him dead?

This was seriously the only thing deciding if I was gonna give this thing a shot or not.

I'm delighted that Tom didn't sully his filmography with capeshit.

>cruise not showing up for this capeshit garbage
based

Absolutely sick music video

They're talking about AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (SONY) doing an alternate universe. There's nothing there that says they even intended to pull a Bond. You are full of shit.

What, you wanted see him get mogged by Wanda? Though, I guess Superior might have sided with her or just fallen asleep during the confrontation cause he didn’t care.

ruffalo is the worst fucking shit
either he doesn't understand who banner is or can't convey it. either is bullshit.
banner is this man who's haunted 24/7 by his past aspirations. his work on gamma caused so much pain and he blames himself for every bit of it. what's worse, he can't even an hero because the biggest result of his accident lives within him, causing more destruction every time he lets go.
so banner on screen should rarely if ever appear relaxed, happy, or content. because he knows in any moment he can lose control and cause pain.
norton's showed this, or at least came close to it. the scene where he refuses to have sex with betty is often mocked but it shows how much norton banner is afraid of losing control.
ruffalo can't convey 1% of that. most common expression he gives is a 'was that a wet fart or did i shit myself'' look.
plus hulk isn't this power/tool/weapon that he can just *that's my secret cap, I'm always angry*

the best hulk-banner relationship imho was immortal hulk >picrel

Attached: photo_2022-05-03_12-16-25.jpg (832x1280, 192.16K)

We don't know he's not in it, do we?

No, we don't. I think it's people trying to save some of the magic of surprise for other Anons. I commend it.

Based I fucking hate Ruffalo's Banner. I liked Norton tho

Ruffalo was good in the first Avengers, but in every film since his Banner has been shitty comic relief and his Hulk a complete afterthought who jobs to Thanos so hard he turns into a nerd and is never seen again.
I think it's to do with the fact that Disney doesn't own the rights to do Hulk solo films by themselves, so they're fucking Hulk over by barely showcasing him, like they did with the X-Men and Fantastic Four in the comics and merch when they didn't have the film rights to them

what a fuckin banger. Thanks for posting, user. Made my night.

I'm so glad this turd isn't in this shit movie. It'd make it even worse

>adult males unironically discuss capeshit
can mods ban these people please?

would have cruise ironman given this movie some decent buzz?

I dont think the guy from the Office US as mr fantastic is gonna cut it

I think the conflict between Hulk and Banner in IW was interesting, but they fucking blew it by just erasing Hulk from existence. I really want to see where they were going with it.

>adult
you SEVERLY underestimate the demographics of Yea Forums user. I started browsing Yea Forums when I was 15 and i'm 21 now.

They maybe could have done something interesting there, but they just completely skipped over any character development in the next one and had Hulk just become a massive green Mark Ruffalo who does nothing

Who would win? Avengers Iron Man or Affleck's Batman?

Attached: tower of babel batman.jpg (720x1109, 127.93K)

me

He was one of a kind.

Attached: 653E3899-DFE2-754A-2A2E504049A3AFF2.jpg (310x465, 33K)

Seriously, Tom as Superior Iron Man is the only thing that can save capeshit. As long as it isn't a standard formula capeshit movie.

They didn't just skip development, they erased the character. Hulk was just killed off-screen. It was only Banner left.

>well one of a thousand reasons.
How about 6 million?

Thinking about it they should have just offered him a 1x pay increase.

This, and it's probably because of some execs said no.
Remember that russo brothers fight with execs to give bigger role to iron man on civil war.
This is a comic book movie.
Who give a shit with black captain marvel? Honestly?
I can understand mordo and captain bongistan, but a black captain marvel?
If the want to fill diversity quota, why not just shuri as female black panther?
She's prettier than the literal sheboon captain marvel.

>Mickey whips out some one comic not-Iron Man or apprentice
Nice contract

Attached: 1557442185658.jpg (1280x720, 145.57K)

I said it before he even died: He is going to reveal that he cloned his brain, and it was used to make an AI. Then he will play supporting role to the new Ironheart female that will take over for him, with him appearing in the movie, but as an "AI." If you use comic logic there is nothing stopping anyone from coming back.

Black Captain Marvel?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lashana_Lynch
Yeah, a literal sheboon

>Do you think it's unreasonable for RDJ to have a contractual clause that says you can't have someone else play his exact character?
Yes, of course. Imagine if someone did it with, sat, Batman.
Nobody's gonna throw away their IP to an actor like that.