Is it just cheaper or what?

I don't know if it's cheaper. They still have to pay these A-list actors to not even act, plus pay for CGI. It's probably just the lazy way.

Attached: avengers homecoming.webm (1920x1080, 2.83M)

Cheaper, faster, easier. Plus, they can also do changes post-production if necessary.
Getting the furniture, paying for them, and putting them in place would be more expensive and take more time.

Yes. You don't even need actors to be on location. You don't need to build expensive sets when a green piece of cloth will do the job.

I don't think it's "that" cheap but its really convenient.

Due to the production schedule MCU films have they basically need to shoot shit whenever the actors available which leads to situations where the actors available but they have no other details of a scene other than the dialogue. So you shoot that and let it get fixed later. As said it allows for last minute changes but also lets them get things in the can whenever the actors are available.

If you watch a lot of the MCU films you start seeing this shit start happening post Iron Man 3. Before then the schedule wasn't as intense with as many films all in production at the same time. Its why you see a lot of practical stuff those films did start getting entirely replaced with CG stuff. No time to actually build and plan a scene because that takes too long. Just film shit and have the VFX team change it later.

Attached: 1640905753865.gif (500x375, 175.02K)

Attached: 1646725856737.jpg (608x608, 70.02K)

In addition, you can distribute production of the film all over the world. Give some parts of the movie to a "b-roll" crew in Indonesia, do the big setpieces with your main animators, etc.

I really like what the Mandolorian does for its LED stage, I hope it becomes more popular.

Attached: Mandalorian_5.jpg (1536x864, 248.44K)

Attached: avengers infinity war 2.webm (1920x1080, 2.85M)

>It is shittier or what?
Yes

Attached: 1507910243164.webm (1920x808, 2.84M)

At this point they should shove these things into animated movies awards to compete with Pixar shit

Technically yes, considering the gun wasn't being used in any action scenes or involved in a lot of movement
Since Fury was just using it as a sitting prop, it wouldn't make much sense to put more resources into making an actual gun

I feel sad for the boom op and sound mixer with those loud ass fans there. I'm surprised Disney even hires sound people for production anymore considering 90% of the movie is ADR.

Yes. You can bypass the union by just forgoing any kind of real set building, gaffing, whatever. Really scummy shit.

i think its more about playing it safe. You can edit a lot when everything is CGI, which means they can change a lot more after shooting the scenes

the onset / on-location sound is usually used as a guide for people doing the audio. It'll feel wrong if the audio is coming from the wrong place.

Which is another way of saying they have no idea what they're doing so they need the freedom to change things at any moment.

how and why does his mask squint?

>considering 90% of the movie is ADR.

That's most movies. Use of raw on set audio isn't a common thing.

Because of the cartoons or mainly spectacular. More obvious emotions shown with squints but either became too much (ultimate) or not much (after ultimate).

But they're gonna use the "because comics" excuse because of art mistakes in said comic.

It's not cheaper, it just gives you more control and flexibility.
They could change what type of gun or thing he's holding 20 times until they got it just right with CG, same with the location he's sitting in.

Also nobody walked out of that movie thinking "wow weird how he had a CG gun", nobody noticed

This is the real answer:
Every bit of these movies are test-screened for the absolute optimal return on investment. Every detail can be tailored to appeal to the broadest audience possible.

cope n sneed you locked sodabrain

It's all CGI. Marvel heroes rarely wear their mask.

Attached: avengers no suit.webm (1920x1080, 2.59M)

It's not rare but certain characters they lean on it more than others, like the full bodysuit or mechanical things like Iron Man

Attached: e_nyc6520_scan_1009_v01_PR-1024x539.jpg (1024x539, 44.67K)

Which is unfortunate
ADR is so fucking noticeable these days, nobody fucking tries anymore

Evans usually avoids wearing the mask because it's uncomfortable, that's why he rarely wears it. In this scene it was needed to hiding the body double.

You dont ever hand a nigger a real gun

Yeah but it adds up to making the movie feeling fake.

all movies are fake

They can shoot all the scenes on a single location, so in theory, it should be cheaper. But on the other hand, they add these silly CGI costs where someone has to make the room in CGI.

So, it's not about what is cheap, it's about what is more convenient.

There's a difference between
>this actually happened
and
>this is all computer generated
that you can tell.

Only acceptable answer

It doesn't matter until it looks bad and drags you out of scenes eg Black Panther

and BP's problem was it was a rush job, not that CG is inherently bad

Attached: ffbc74965f6892f2081767859fee235c.jpg (735x514, 42.05K)

they couldn't have just given him a pellet gun?

Showing weight is why he has a prop of any kind at all

Did they change the logo on her chest?

Yeah, they also removed wrinkles from the suit and changed the color of her shoulder pads.

goddamn i didn't even notice the shoulder pads

Funny you should mention it: the masked Cap is Evans, and the mask is CG
His body double played the maskless one, and they CG'd his face out

>Mandalorian LED wall is a video wall designed by ILM especially for Mandolrian. The video wall consists of 1326 LED screens of 2.84 mm pixels. The height of this wall aka The Volume/StageCraft is 20 feet, width is 75 feet and is 270 degrees around. This technology is an evolved version of previously used methods of displaying live images behind the cast.

It's getting there - Star Trek uses that tech now, Batman just used it, Marvel start using it from Thor 4 onwards

>They still have to pay these A-list actors not to even act
Ah yes, smashing into a cement floor. This is what you hire A-listers for.

No, the CGI is because medical bills on an a stunt man is expensive because lmao, they're Americans.

>audiences don't know that guns are kind of heavy
But you do, right user?
You seem like a bitch.

Nah that's you

They couldn't even find a room to film the scene in?

>impromptu breakfast reservations
"I'm really sorry."
"Does this mean I have to kill Kim now?"
"…Could you?"

Fpbp

>But they're gonna use the "because comics" excuse because of art mistakes in said comic.
You think this is a mistake and not on purpose?

Attached: astonishing2.jpg (361x400, 80.48K)

I don't mind the gun but the fact that they couldn't even put him in a real room with a wall behind him is making me feel so butthurt

with how much that nigger Sam Jackson charges yeah you bet your sweet ass its a lot cheaper to do one take and then worry about everything else in post.
also, they'll just get it in post.