Europeans are…le bad

I was surprised this movie basically portrayed the natives defending their land and the English trying to conquer it as equally belligerent and justified forces. I can see why injuns didn't like it.

then stop coming here

Attached: 1651346063220.gif (400x225, 283.53K)

Imagine if they had used this design

There should’ve been a post credit scene showing her entire tribe being rape(for historical accuracy)

Wendy absolutely seething. Same voice actress as Alice.

Attached: 1638119070165.webm (600x600, 2.92M)

>Brits
>European

Attached: unimpressed.png (429x410, 11.38K)

Attached: 0A4D039B-BC59-446D-9877-C79AF825545D.jpg (235x256, 11.72K)

only angloids and dutch are bad

Except the ones that go crazy for native pussy. They're alright.

Did they made it like Rango?

Third worlder here. Can confirm.

>humans were made for...

John Smith would’ve been s drawn and quartered for Race Mixing if this movie was accurate

Imagine the character meet and greets at the parks.

dishonest animation

>Defending your homeland is racist and evil.
Truly a movie ahead of its time.

Not really. Europeans were fucking natives all the time and nobody cared. There's stories about when they went to the Pacific Islands and got horny for all the topless women and had sex with them all and it was all okay since the natives were not Christian.

Racial purity was a maximum priority for the British Empire at the time, mingling with natives definitely wasn’t acceptable

People knew how to take a joke back then
Based

Attached: 1647949757913.webm (576x1024, 851.02K)

Fuck outta mandem's blocks blood, never show your mug in south london again

Attached: Jafar.jpg (1920x1080, 143.64K)

irl Pocahontas married a British man and lived in England and nobody gave a fuck.

source or more info on that clip?

Idk

This is what they took from us

Yes.

The model for Tarzan was impossibly flexible. Glad I got the opportunity to draw him a few times.

Pocahontas was captured and held for ransom by English Colonists during hostilities in 1613. During her captivity, she was encouraged to convert to Christianity and was baptized under the name Rebecca. She married tobacco planter John Rolfe in April 1614 at the age of about 17 or 18, and she bore their son Thomas Rolfe in January 1615.[1]

In 1616, the Rolfes travelled to London where Pocahontas was presented to English society as an example of the "civilized savage" in hopes of stimulating investment in the Jamestown settlement. On this trip she may have met Squanto, a "Patuxet Native American" from New England.[5] She became something of a celebrity, was elegantly fêted, and attended a masque at Whitehall Palace. In 1617, the Rolfes set sail for Virginia; Pocahontas died at Gravesend of unknown causes, aged 20 or 21. She was buried in St George's Church, Gravesend, in England; her grave's exact location is unknown because the church was rebuilt after being destroyed by a fire.[1]

>She became something of a celebrity, was elegantly fêted
Why do white people worship nonwhites so much

>NOOOO! THEY HAVE TO DRAW EVERYTHING FROM THEIR HEAD!!!!

Attached: 1607132456160.png (377x377, 248.86K)

They're exotic.

the british allowed heretics and criminals in the new world, I'm sure they didn't care about race mixing

What a cute girl.

It was more the idea that they could take a lesser race and make them presentable, retard

Easy one of the top 3 best Disney girls with Ariel and Rapunzel.

Well then why do they still worship them, retard. You can't explain Floydmania that way

Walt pls.

Attached: Kathryn Beamount Walt Disney.jpg (1334x1490, 765.12K)

>1600s
>Britain
>racial purity
Race science wasn't a thing yet.

No Pocahontas said "Le both sides bad" it's a liberal film. Originally the movie was gonna criticize the colonizers more but Disney execs didn't like that.

court novelty, Isabella of Spain had a midget dancer and Oda Nobunaga had a pet negro he would use to scare people

It was invented by the Arabs during the Islamic Golden Age and even the Ancient Greeks and Romans had some version of it

Attached: Da4TnhlXUAEPT5C.jpg (887x470, 88.06K)

The only good part of that movie was the savages song. Even as a kid, I wanted those injuns to die

there's always that one retard with shit takes

And it's you

No, it's this retard

There wasn't a conception of racial purity, England was homogenous, no one was gonna execute a sailor who went off and banged some native broad, unless they were mutineering. Race science was more a 18th/19th century thing.

>BWC is... le good.

i dunno man its pretty hard to tell a white person from a black, they just look so alike

Made for BWC
add Jews while you're at that

the fat purple guy IRL wasn't evil, and was in fact murdered by the same natives under false pretenses (they proclaimed a truce, and then attacked him and his men). They skinned him alive.

>Racial purity was a maximum priority for the British Empire at the time,
lmfao /pol/chuds are amazing

>England was homogenous
england was also multicult bigot, just look at all those african soldiers Rome used, clearly the country has always been diverse

You see europeans... I see doctors, lawyers, engineers

Refute his claim

>They skinned him alive.
Based. Fuck the angl*s.

kek

So true, they found a skeleton from Roman north Africa in Britain, so it was 20% sub Saharan African

foh paco

wdym?

seethe

present a single source supporting the claim that "racial purity" was a maximum priority of the british empire during the 17th century. hell, present a single source even referring to racial purity.

What "take" is that? Are you assuming whites don't worship nonwhites?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrophilia

The movie actually implies both are wrong in thinking each other as savages.

It's supposed to be through pocahontas and John Smith that they finally understand each other and stop fighting so it's not calling the Europeans bad only ratcliffe

you're literally BROWN

yeah we know the movie is ahistorical globohomo tolerance trash, bub