Liked the movie, but the third act seriously was underwhelming. I hoped that leak about Riddler making Batman choose between killing Penguin or saving Gotham was real.
Or maybe do a Joker and end with a revolution Riddler starts and making Batman choose between fighting the poor to protect the rich or fighting the rich to protect the poor, instead of making Riddler a full cartoonish villain making Batman doubt his morality and if he wants to be like his father or better.
cut it entirely and wrap up when the Riddler is caught with some slight changes to finish it
Andrew Wilson
>Riddler is taken out by police >Sees Batman staring at him >Look at each other >Riddler says "I am Batman" and laughs >Batman sees him being taken away in the middle of the night >End credits Or something like that. Would be kino to leave the audience wondering who was the real "hero" of the story
Camden Morales
The third act was fine. The twist with the flood was good, and seeing Batman take on all of the Riddler goons was fucking kino. Plus him cutting the line and getting the civilians out from the wreckage is a true superhero moment.
The Riddler is a vigilante with a plan that actually works. He, crazy and all, took care of the most important man in Gotham's Crime Family. He broke the cycle that Batman himself is part of, armed only with a rifle.
I have to be honest anyway, Direction did an excellent job of showing Falcone in his final seconds. He looks totally vulnerable and conveys the core value that killing is wrong. Tuturro was amazing on this. But when you think about it coldly, Riddler is a pragmatic man who is essentially right. He is Rorschach without the charisma.
Elijah Hall
Cut it.
Charles Thompson
I'm Venn Gents would've been better and fit the idea they were going for.
James Anderson
>The Riddler is a vigilante with a plan that actually works. Works at doing what exactly? He kills Falcone only for the Penguin to take his place.
Evan Foster
Fuck the third act. Have Batman just brutally mog people for 90 minutes. I'm talking about straight Mortal Kombat style shit. No remorse.
>SOMETHING IN THE WAYYYYY
Christopher Harris
>The Riddler is a vigilante with a plan that actually works >Riddler is a pragmatic man who is essentially right He was until all the flood the city nonsense. That's the problem with the third act.
Owen Peterson
>Rorschach >charisma
he was almost entirely friendless and everyone hated him
Parker Edwards
This movie has one of the strongest third acts in years.
Ian Wood
>seeing Batman take on all of the Riddler goons was fucking kino no it wasn't. looked like a ps3 cutscene.
I wasn't saying you're wrong. I just think it's an interesting perspective. I don't know why Batman thinks killing is wrong to be honest desu. Seems like it would solve most of his problems from my low class life.
Prove it. Explain what the fuck it means. Explain what "dishonest filmmaking" is and how it's not a sperg cope at all.
Adrian Taylor
I saw a BTS footage with real smoke being used, It looks so fake here. So what do you think happened?
Thomas Brown
I never said anything about samefagging, you idiot. Learn to read.
William Phillips
Why aren't his movements displacing the smoke?
Aaron Harris
A. Because killing politicians isn't enough. Not for a real change. B. In all the chaos, Riddler's troops could slip past the nonexistent security C. Because he's crazy D. To make the climax of the movie, y'know, climactic E. So that Batman actually fails for a change
David Bailey
Schizo is usually used when accusing people of samaefagging. Kys subhuman.
Cameron Baker
Like I said. Schizos.
Kayden Edwards
>So that Batman actually fails for a change We already saw him fail in TDK and BvS.
Daniel Perez
I shouldn't have to explain it. a true kinoseur just feels it.
Unironically. Cinema is based on the deception of the senses. When a film is dishonest you know something is tremendously wrong with it.
Jack Ward
By stopping all movies from being made that have guns in them pointed at the main character yet they don't pull the trigger or savor it for some reason. Instantly takes me out of every movie. Don't even have armor that stops bullets. If you get shot and you have kevlar on, you have a broken rib now, the 2nd lead actor shouldn't come out of nowhere and save you. You have a broken rib and the next one is going in your head. That character dies.
Isaiah Collins
needles cg touch ups. hollywood hacks do it all the time.
Bentley Rivera
NTA but what the fuck are you talking about? Stop being so vague, language exists for a reason, fucking use it faggots. You don't need retarded empty criticism to explain why you dislike something of a movie. By example I disliked the third act of The Batman because it felt contradictory to the ambience it had in the first two. See? not that hard.
This is why you will never be a filmmaker. You can't argue beyond pretentious statements you don't even know what they mean. You don't want or care about movies, you just want an excuse to cope with your inferiority complex.
Jonathan Morgan
yup. like drinking milk that has just begone to sour. anyone with an even slightly refined palate would immediately detect that something is off. npc's on the other hand: don't. because even the sheer concept of having taste is alien to them.
So basically you're an autist who can't justify the use of the term as being anything more than meaningless autistic rambling. Good to know.
Andrew Cook
Not enough bullets and drown the middle
John Evans
You first, tourist. Schizo is synonymous with sperg or aspie on this board
James Reyes
It's so lazy. It's not that they do CGI touch ups(even the best do that), it's that they're so brainless with it. Like another user pointed out, Batman doesn't displace the smoke as he moves through them. Like that's basic shit they should remember when doing stuff. It immediately feels fake to the audience even if can't articulate why. Go watch that scene in Arrival where they move through some dense mist and how tactile it feels.
Brandon Wilson
>you need a refined palate to be able to tell when milk is bad