ITT: actors who would NEVER sink to doing capeshit

DiCaprio

while not directly capeshit, he was in adaptation of Japanese comic "Edge of Tomorrow"

Scorsese films are literally capeshit.

No capeshit, then A History of Violence is capeshit

Attached: MV5BNjk1MjIxNjUxNF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwODk2NzM4Mg@@._V1_UY1200_CR103,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg (630x1200, 64.81K)

Explain to me how The Mummy wasn't capeshit.

somebody is forgetting about his shitty "we want to be Marvel" Mummy movie

Not badsed on any comic books. It was normal action horror blockbuster in Underworld or Van Helsing style.

this, mobshit was capeshit of it's era - and with similar devastating consequences.

How many black and italian youths thought they could be street dons after watching his shit?

how are any of the movies hes done in the last 15 years any different from superhero movies?

>Daniel Day Lewis.

Lincoln was American history capeshit

Lol, you think goodfellas made niggers into niggers?

The Mummy was an attempt at making a capeshit franchise out of classic monsters by Alex Kurtzman.
That's lower than a Marvel movie.

>Not badsed on any comic books.

what makes that different than a standard action flick?

In what way is Spiderman by Raimi or Punisher or Blade different than that?

Tom does it for real unlike capeshitters on greenscreen. It's disrespectful to compare his risky stunts to safe greenscreen shit and post production.

LOTR is capeshit.

Fortunately I haven't seen it.

no, but it played a big role in creating a modern culture that mixed in with rap music

see the 90s

>It was normal action horror blockbuster in Underworld or Van Helsing style
So was Hellboy and that IS based on comics.

It's cloakshit. Very different

My cousin is quite a wigger that was into hip hop in the 90s. He also enjoyed gangster movies.
I would assume you are contending that hip hop in general was spawned out of emulation of mob mobies.

hats what I'm saying. It was normal blockbuster like dozens of others. Following this you can basically blur the line. Capeshit is supposed to be based on superhero comic book. No need to extend this definition because at some point you will call every normal blockbuster a capeshit even if it is not related to comics at all.

Dummy

Attached: 74C0CA6C-F8C1-4692-8BA1-657404BBD97A.jpg (184x274, 10.21K)

what makes Blade any different though? Based on a comic but no different of an action movie than Van Helsing.

Maybe the problem is solely the MCU raping the formula rather than anything else.

who said anything about stunts. theyre shit movies, period.

that shitty mummy remake was essentially capeshit with a planned out franchise but the first movie was so shit it killed the whole thing

idk i feel like there's a difference between adam west and burt ward vs other versions of batman and robin. like the 60's b&r are so culturally significant that it doesn't exactly mean he's into superheroes.

Steve Buscemi
Jon Hamm
Mel Gibson
Matthew McConaughey
Di Caprio
Sean Penn
Vince Vaughn

Kek true

>capeshit this
>capeshit that
Do you fucking realise there are other big blockbusters that are not capeshit at all? For example Independence Day. Massive action blockbuster but absolutely not related to any kind of superhero comics. Or stuff like Inception. It's action blockbuster again not related to comic books. Capeshit is all about superhero comic books and that's it.

CAPESHIT:
Superman
Batman
Spiderman

NOT CAPESHIT:
Independence Day
Inception
Terminator

Stop throwing every blockbuster into capeshit bag because at some point you will end up with capeshit and nothing more.

At this point no one is above it. Any actor you wouldn't expect to be in it just says they did it for their kids or their nephew or something.

The Mummy is essentially based on Bram Stoker's novel about egyptian queen waking up in England and trying to reshape the world. They just added Mission Impossible style action all over it.

Attached: The mummy.png (800x1241, 611.16K)

She’s walled, she would be le quirky romantic interest in a Marvel flick if she was 20 years younger.

Van Helsing is capeshit

Sin City has superhero archetypes in a fantastical noir setting. History of Violence (and Road to Perdition) were both toned-down versions of graphic novels that leaned toward traditional realism. Don't be dumb.

Shit actor bros...

It has exaggerated noir archetypes, and lots of capeshit borrows from noir. Just having larger than life characters doesn't make something capeshit. The superhero genre is very specific.

Attached: Admiral Thrawn.png (1280x1062, 2M)

Attached: 1608869506530.jpg (299x376, 26.44K)

He did Sir Billi, he'd do capeshit if they told him it would promote Scotland.

delete your post and apologize

Lol, mexican ironman would not believable lol lmfao

Attached: 1644883655015.gif (400x308, 564.19K)

Dumbass post of the day.

Yea Forums has started referring to everything as capeshit, and it's retarded. You are 100% right.

my understanding is that they wanted pierce brosnan as batman for batman 1989. he took one look at the suit, laughed, and walked away.

Johnny Depp, and now that he's won back the public with this trial, he's going back to blockbusters not based on superheroes.

No, he walked away when the studio refused to let him choose Kim Basinger's caterers.

>Sir Billi
It's weird seeing all the CGI art styles that have been tried over the years, why'd we get stuck with the grubhub abomination

He did one slightly capeshitty movie and it's an instant cult classic

He's playing Doctor Fate in the Black Adam movie, if they'd offered him Batman, he would've taken it.

League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

So what makes superhero movies so much more abhorrent than anything else? I've seen people on this board praise Jason Stratham for not stooping to capeshit, but the Fast and Furious movies are just as ridiculous and if he was willing to do an Uwe Boll video game adaptation, what makes him above this genre?

>Sean Penn
So he can do a voice in a movie literally based on an app (Angry Birds), but somehow he has too much dignity for capes