How was the CGI so good?
How was the CGI so good?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
1.) it wasn’t be rushed to meet a deadline like MCU movies 2.) they weren’t trying to make the prawns look photorealistic and took liberties with their design
FUCK I MADE A TYPO TYPING THAT. PEOPLE ARE GONNA THINK IM INDIAN NOW SHIT.
Calm down Rajesh
Good morning sir
sirs...
>hey weren’t trying to make the prawns look photorealistic and took liberties with their design
What the fuck are you on about
They are photorealistic, not cartoons
Good morning ser!
I type bad for she
Do not redeem pls sir.
kindly do the needful sir
Don't be so harsh. He's Indian so he can't speak English properly.
Mix of practical and CGI in real environments not greenscreens.
good morning sir i am the sweetie man u want sweetie?? fokken blody bastard benchod bitch rigatoni
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAM
>t. Durgesh
user, that wasn’t CGI. They were real aliens.
Chin up Apu, here's something to cheer you up
youtu.be
kek
lighting and unfamiliar non-human characters / props
when they were escaping the lab and the alien guns simply obliterated the humans into fucking chunky blood stains, the sounds of it...holy shit, i was fucking floored. i had never seen such rawness in a movie before. it felt real. felt kind of demoralizing too in a way.
that movie had a realness to it that i don't think any sci-fi will achieve again for some time
>poo in the streets
>poo in the thread
Classic Sanjay
Western animation with passion behind it. Now all CGI is made by chinks. I also have a theory Hollywood is shitting CGI on purpose to make audiences prepared for even cheaper CGI. I mean most backgrounds in fucking Monk tv-series are CGI and they are better than current movies.
good morning sir bloody basterd
cancelled Halo movie leftovers
it doesn't have to talk like buildings or any cgi animal. make them talk and it becomes weird
esl btfo'd himself
>it doesn't have to talk like buildings
the fuck is going on in this thread
Too many fucking pajeets have stormed Yea Forums. They heard us laughing about DC movies
This. Every The Batman thread is populated with angry pajeets defending the movie.
Literally SOUL vs SOULLESS (marvel).
>he doesn’t have to talk like buildings
Wut ?
Too late poojeet, now do the funny tik tok
is this the poo thread
Why do indians think standing so close to a moving train is cool?
fuck train sir
train is a bloody bastard
i fuck train bloody!!! good mornings
> They knew exactly what they were going for from the get-go.
> They made sure the prawns felt like they belonged in the environment they moved in (interacting with the environment, accurate lighting, performances etc.)
> They knew how to distribute their budget and time.
> The handheld photography helps somewhat.
thats not cgi, they got actual south africans to play them
did he die
I think it's also a contrast thing. I always though that movies that have decent CGI with a amateurish/mockumentary side are often good at making the scifi/fantasy part visually more believable.
Same for the second pirates of the caribbean movie, the director extensively worked with the VFX team instead of them working independently on these shots. Also the team used a real life model of the aliens in each shot for reference.
It doesn't have an anthropomorphic face you retards. my god everything have to be spelled out here.
I just wanted to point out this movie came out the same year as James Cameron's Avatar and 20 times better than Avatar. They're the same movie at the core, storywise, but District 9 is actually fucking great.
>poo in the streets
>shit in the sheets
Crazy how they did this too. So the guy who played the prawns (one guy) wore a mocap suit, but the cg team couldn't use any if the data from it.
They had to animate everything by hand, using the original footage as a base.
They are inhuman, so entering uncanny valley is less likely.
Pakistan is in the bag with indians doing this shit
Oooohhhh you know he dead
what did they use for this?
Houdini or Maya?
>that frame
Every fucking time lmao
it was not be a real misstake gentle man
It doesn't. It looks like a fucking PS3 cutscene.
what the bitch basterd is this it look so many real
is he be the ok?
Don't listen to these faggots, they don't know shit about anything
The reason is because the lighting looks grounded and realistic whereas in most blockbuster films is usually overdone to be more eye catching
This video explains in depth why CGI and VFX often don't look realistic
It wasn't cgi, there are just people who look like that in south africa.
Blomkamp gave ashit.
I DID NOHT HAVE SECKS
WID THOSE FOOKIN CREACHURES MAN
mmm bug pusi
I've seen better in MCU movies