I'm still not going to watch this goofy garbage

It's a good movie. Solid attempt at neo noir, which is something I can get behind. Batman even narrates pieces a la noire. The mob, conspiracies, terrorism, detective work, and character relationships work well. Shitty incels who got mad because they project themselves onto the riddler and bitch about 'le racism against whites!' because Catwoman had a throwaway line against white privileged assholes (which is counterbalanced completely within the same movie with riddler being a forgotten and abused orphan with no power and oh yeah he was white). Yea Forums is sometimes fucking worst then reddit

war criminals literally post here

Although of those things felt incredibly boring and barely touched on or went into any depth about them. The closest thing it went into with the mob was cat woman’s daddy issue subplot story. But don’t you have to be retarded to like the film for what it presents at face value? I mean, it’s no game of thrones season 2. No one has any rational or realistic motives, and it’s just stupid viewing it at that level imo

The movie sucked, dude.
The Batman narration was cringe worthy.
The conspiracy is dumb easy to figure out yet Batman and James Gordon are morons that take their time to understand. The moment the club was introduced i already knew everyone was on Falcone's pocket.
The relationships were awful. There's no chemistry at all between them. The romance between Batman and Catwoman feels forced. Batman and Alfred relationship is almost non-existent.
The movie has no good scene, no stakes, no suspense, no nothing. Every good idea introduce is squandered a feel minutes later with dumb non-twists meant to negate the impact of things. Oh noes, Alfred is dead, but wait he isn't!

>Matt Reeves
That's literally all you had to say.

Batman looks so fucking retarded I cannot bring myself to watch it. It's like they made a Batman movie aimed towards the majority of people with spergers and downs, "hey finally a Batman that looks like me!"

The movie is long and boring, but the Bat costume is probably one of the best ones to date.
Aside from the camera contact lenses, the Bat tech wasn't really over-the-top.

I agree. I'm honestly so tired of /pol/tards yapping about race, they're 2013 tumblr tier obsessed with identity politics.

who asked?

This movie was frustrating.
Batman is meant to be violent and scary, but in every other scene aside from the prologue EVERYONE feels no respect or awe for Batman. They look down at him and are gunning to take him down. Batman also never truly hurts anyone.
Alfred was meant to die, but then didn't.
Thomas Wayne was meant to be crooked, but then wasn't.
Maroni killed Batman's parents, but then it was Falcone that killed Batman's parents, but wait actually maybe no one killed Batman's parents and it was just a robbery gone wrong. Who knows!
The Riddler seemed to know that Batman was Bruce Wayne, but then didn't.
James Gordon was going to catch shit from leaking the photos through his account, but then didn't.
Batman was meant to unhinged and violent capable of crossing a line (specially for others he loved like his father Thomas), but then didn't.
Batman was meant to be hunted by the police for his involvement, but then wasn't. I guess all the corrupt ones died or something.
El Rata Alada was meant to be the Penguin (WTF?), but then it was Falcone, wait actually it is just means URL (LOL, What?)

It's like a everything in this movie is designed to subvert your expectations. Well, consider it down. I thought i was going to see a good and interesting Batman movie. I didn't.

I’m not trying to ask with any hate or judgement, but are you at least a millennial and still liked it? I thought maybe it would be like Nolan’s go at the franchise, but this felt like it was made primarily emo zoomers. I didn’t get a single thing about the film that I was supposed to be invested into or relate with. None of the characters made sense and the story felt very boring for me

Me.

Attached: images.jpg (224x225, 3.99K)

Zoomers are entertained by popsicle stick theater dressed up with millions of dollars of CGI, what you experienced is another dumbing down of pop culture in real time.

Literally (You)

Attached: 429D0171-0553-4334-9E77-809264E2C378.jpg (739x415, 17.46K)

I'm 27.
I watched The Dark Knight a week earlier and thought it aged horribly, watched Reeves Batman a week later and really enjoyed it.

>None of the characters made sense
How did Batman not make sense?

im watching it right now, its meh

I thought it was good, too. it's funny seeing anons seething over people liking it, too. They want to turn tv into a plebbit level echochamber I guess.

I don’t even know how to identify with his struggle. What made the Nolan film’s good is Batman at least had a struggle it felt like I could relate to in all 3 films. His struggle was what? He just seemed like he was some emo guy. I guess he had a problem with society. But that’s much different than how the other Batman was presented in Nolan’s version. The other one Batman is learning how to cope with the loss of his parents. This Batman was closer to an emo bad boy

>How did Batman not make sense?
How did Batman make sense?
The prologue says that he is scary and that criminals run just from thinking that he might appear, but the rest of the movie shows that not one single criminal fears him. They treat him with complete disregard. The Joker gang members playing the Knockout game weren't scared of him, the Penguin's henchmen didn't fear him, the Falcone's henchmen didn't fear him, the corrupt cops didn't fear him, the Riddler's followers didn't fear him.
Batman has been active for two years but throughout these years never thought about going against corrupt officials or the mobsters controlling the city, just the small fry that do small crimes. Does that make any fucking sense to you?
This Batman is meant to be realistic but wears a Iron Man tier invincible suit that lets him survive from dangerous falls, bombs exploding in close proximity, eating machine gun bullets, and everything else you can think off. Nobody tries to shoot his face or limbs that are left unprotected.
Batman is shown to be dumb as fuck but the cops still call him to crime scenes to help them investigate stuffs. Why? "Oh, it's just James Gordon". Again, why Gordon would trust his dumb ass? Just because apparently. Why the other cops let that shit fly? Because.

The movie that broke Snyderfags

>Nobody tries to shoot his face or limbs that are left unprotected
LMAO this fagot is watching LITERAL CAPESHIT, but whining like a bitch about stuff like this. Pathetic, just kys dude.

Attached: 1631237109439.jpg (2048x2048, 315.7K)

don't forget batman caused a huge car accident where innocent people died

i will always love batfleck

>Batman was meant to unhinged and violent capable of crossing a line
he nearly bludgeoned a man to death, but I guess that doesn't count because it would break your retarded narrative.

He's the worst batman

>he nearly bludgeoned a man to death
Where?
You mean the scene where he injected himself with adrenaline? The movie shows the guy's face after and the dude is completely fine. The guy is even able to smile and taunt Batman back by saying he's vengeance.

>the dude is completely fine
why are you lying? What do you gain by it? Is someone paying you to lie in order to dissuade other anons from watching this?

Attached: Screenshot_20220420-210016_Gallery.jpg (1440x1413, 617.6K)

I have a soft spot for fat alcoholic batmen with anger management issues.

I don’t know if he’s lying or not, I know what he’s talking about but forget who said that. But he is right to dissuade people at least. No adult will like this

The guy is shown without any serious bruise, just a broken nose. That's it.
The movie is too safe and PG-13 for its own good.
If the guy had been shown coughing his own blood and barely able to speak you'd be right. But he wasn't.

>just turn your brain off bro
I thought this movie was supposed to be hecking smart and mature.

we know

>fully concious
>still has all his teeth
>no blood
>able to talk and taunt batman
Yes. He was fine.

were you whining when Aunt May did a full monologue full of quips before falling to her death? I don't remember any anons complaining about that, I wonder why

youtube.com/watch?v=6tVAY43yRX4

dont know man. i saw this board suck that spiderman movie's dick, then nitpick this kino to death.

>muh Marvel

I just finished the movie.
There are only two guys where Batman is shown getting violent with.
The guy from the Knockout game. That scene was in every fucking trailer for this movie. You see Batman punching down a guy and continuing to pummel him once he's down. But we later see that guy getting up as well as the rest of the people involved in the Knockout game.
Then there's the Riddler's goon that shot Batman and later tried to stab Catwoman. That's at the end when Batman uses adrenaline to get up and beat the guy up. Gordon even comes in to hold Batman back.
This goon is shown to be completely fine. He's proud and smiling. He's the one that calls himself "vengeance".

They didn't want to do another origin story. Batman's character here was leagues more believable and compelling than the conventional "billionaire playboy captain of industry with a dark alter ego" shit in Nolan movies.

Action scene realism commentary is who gives a shit, Batman failing to arrest the dude basically running the city strains believability but makes some sense.

>Batman is shown to be dumb as fuck but the cops still call him to crime scenes to help them investigate stuffs.
He makes mistakes but he's still mostly very quick to pick up on stuff. He does better detective work than any other Batman.

I think you’re missing the point. You’re looking for realism in a super hero movie. It can be a smart movie without a realistic one

that's what I'm saying. I think The Batman was average 5/10. But even I can pick up how easy tv goes on MCU diarreah like NWH, while discussing every frame of movies like this.

I like number man. But I disagree with him on this one.

It’s 3 hours long of something IN THE WAY
MMMMMM-mmm

That's funny because I don't remember you complaining about /pol/, "incels", et cetera when we were spamming about the anti-white line in spiderman and calling us warner shills
But maybe you weren't really here?

>were you whining when Aunt May did a full monologue full of quips before falling to her death
I didn't watch No Way Home because i thought that was going to be a soulless movie, but if they had the balls to actually off Marisa Tomey then that dreck of a movie has more balls than this one.
This one teased Alfred's death to try and inject a bit of suspense and drama, but then right after undid all of that. Pussy move. Same with trying to make Thomas corrupt then pussying out of that.

>smiling
>people can't smile while in physical pain
>people can't smile when their seconds away from death
pls kys already, mousecuck

>it can only be gritty and realistic when it feels like it
Sorry ESL. Not how a good movie works. You need a consistent tone.

It's a 7/10 and people overhyping or calling it shit are both retarded

>Action scene realism commentary is who gives a shit
I do, specially when the marketing was all about how this movie was more grounded and realistic than past Batman movies. Reeves is even on record saying that this was something never done before.

Lol, now this is cope. you fags let that Miles Morales nigger slurping shit go because of muh heckin Tobey. STFU

The dude was smiling AND talking. His face also seemed fine other than a twisted nose.

my issue is that ive set dawn of justice (ultimate cut obviously) so high i this movie needs to exceed those expectations for me to want to sink 3 hours of my life into it. with the black washing of jim gordan and the unironic "rich white men" line, its set itself off to a bad start

>can pick up how easy tv goes on MCU diarreah
It was just a handful of capeshit fanboys and shills repeating themselves. Same as this movie.

Batman is miraculously lucky with injuries and his suit has sci fi durability, but the action choreography was still much more grounded than any other Capeshit I've seen.

>His face also seemed fine
post it

>I'm still not going to watch this goofy garbage.
Just going to spam threads about it 24/7 instead, right? Stop pretending you're not on your fifth paid rewatch, Pajeet.

Let me punch you in the face 20 times and find out.

twitter.com/search?q=the batman boring&src=typed_query&f=top

Neither character is really at all realistic. But what’s still interesting is the stories they can create. In Nolan’s version, Batman is sort of this guy who has it all. He’s even a billionaire and has amazing abilities. But he has to learn to over come his dark side by defeating villains, and by the third film he’s no longer Batman, and settles into a normal life. It’s unrealistic, but you can find a way to identify with Batman, he’s really just maturing as a person, and you know what lessons he learns along the way. This Batman only seemed like he was some dark guy a little discontent with the world, but wanted to fix it. I guess that’s relatable maybe? But it just wasn’t relatable to me is all I’m saying. That’s why I found the film so boring

We’re back to the moral underworlds of Saw, Seven, and Zodiac, back to the beginning of when adolescent consumers were first trained into grateful compliance with only a soupçon of cynicism. Cynicism was smartness. Now cynicism is all. The Batman can declare “Fear is a tool” and have the full support of Warner Bros. media behind it. (No coincidence that society’s politically progressive “stakeholders” act as proprietary as corporate stockholders.)
This is political decadence more than anything else. Coming exactly 100 years after F. W. Murnau’s still-disturbing Nosferatu, The Batman doesn’t earn being called artistic decadence. Its depiction of social horror isn’t fully imagined; it never gets to the core of spiritual repulsion that Murnau touched. The mythology of good and evil, so important for Murnau, has no resonance for Reeves. One is merely offended by Reeves’s obvious political allegories that are too vague and trite to take seriously. Given the moody photography and action set-pieces staged at J. J. Abrams’s level, The Batman hits no deeper than Dick Tracy and his cartoon foes as conceived by a depressive.

simply put? It's a true example of fedoracore we haven't seen in years

Attached: 1466702294365.png (749x2209, 2.92M)

Is this the face of someone who's inches away from dying?
The dude just has a broken nose. That's it.
I guess this Batman just isn't strong enough with his punches or something.

Attached: 1619626849575.png (857x645, 108.68K)

Sorry, the movie is so dark you can't see shit.

just take the L and stop replying, Rajeesh. You've embarrassed yourself enough.

>Rajeesh
That weak defense of the movie, when the movie itself was the biggest success in India to date is really fucking funny.

Attached: 1628063667198.png (735x689, 299.75K)

>weak defense
where in my post did I defend anything? Basic reading comprehension too hard for you, Rajesh?

I thought India was full of Snydercucks?

Bale's Batman was boring as fuck dude. Besides, Pattinson also developed, realizing mere vengeance holds no value, moral judgments aren't as black and white as he thinks, and his estate and boring financial responsibilities have meaningful consequences.

That's what The Batman fans want you to believe. Like every shitskin they're ashamed of their own birthplace.

>Besides, Pattinson also developed, realizing mere vengeance holds no value, moral judgments aren't as black and white as he thinks, and his estate and boring financial responsibilities have meaningful consequences.
So he learned something Christian Bale's Batman learned in the first 30 mins of BB?

They wanted Pattinson to have the same arc that Bale did. Low IQ buffoons can’t appreciate anything different than exactly what they expect.

You haven't heard? the people that were calling you a yidney shill last year all hate snyder and snyder fans now

>They wanted Pattinson to have the same arc that Bale did.
But that's exactly what fucking happened. It just was drawn out to three fucking hours.

And what did Bale learn over the next eight hours of film?

His arc wasn’t even an arc you should have to realize. Maybe it’s an arc that zoomers need to learn because they’re obsessed with online issues where maybe that stuff doesn’t seem immediately obvious

and how is that a bad thing? It’s just the filmmakers artistic choice...

Not sure I can make it thru… Pattinson is too much of an emo faggot

He was blinded by his hatred, his loss, his own depression. As Matt Reeves himself said, this Batman is mentally ill. He didn’t see past his own issues. I thought it was well done, personally.

That being Batman escalated things, that Gotham to fix itself needed to work within the system and not depend reckless vigilantism, that he couldn't keep on doing this for long without dying or wrecking his body, and also that the Patriotic Act was just and proper for its times.

The same shit The Batman showed, really, just better and in more interesting ways.