I wish I could have seen how triggered this made the chuds then.
I wish I could have seen how triggered this made the chuds then
it didnt cos he earned it
This. Freeman was an excellent choice for the role. There was nothing to get mad about,
If this was made today i would seethe but back then freeman was just cool and the casting choice made sense.
why? he is /ourguy/
Amazingly, I remember zero butthurt about this. Society has regressed since then.
nigger fatigue wasn't an issue yet
It caused none, movies were made for entertainment, now they’re made to “stunning and brave”. If they made a remake it’d be called Briana Almighty and God would be a black tranny and the humor would be SNL tier at best
it didn't because america hadn't yet become a farcical parody of itself when that movie came out.
i don't think you are familiar w/mr. freeman's views
Chuds were babies when this came out and haven't had their brains permanently destroyed by right-wing propaganda and sex deprivation.
Absolutely none. God being a black guy was actually kind of funny and Morgan Freeman is extremely recognizable. Back then it was different, you could actually accept the existence of black people in movies because they weren't obnoxious about it.
Today Freeman would have gone on a rant about muh slavery in the movie and race would have been immediately pointed out about his character
Instead back then, no big deal
racism didnt exist back then, it was reinvented in 2009
White people weren't demonized for everything 24/7 because no social media.
Morgan Freeman was based until BLM made him walk back his "if you want to stop racism, stop talking about it" statement.
Chud here, you're 100% right.
Bruce Almighty is a staple of my childhood.
Absolutely nobody had an issue with Morgan Freeman as God, because Morgan Freeman has a voice that one can totally believe belongs to God. It was only after this movie that casting a baritone black man as God became cliche.
>God can look like anything he wants
>chooses to look like Morgan Freeman
No one was triggered by this. That's what you discord trannies don't get it's not about seeing black people, it's about seeing ugly chimps with no charisma get cast in roles where they don't belong. No one has a problem with Denzel Washington getting cast as a dirty cop, they have a problem with ugly John Boyega.
nobody care when this movie came out they weren't as big of crybabbie victims back then.
god everyone is so annoying now.
Racism was dead and buried untill a certain nigger president decided to bring it back to life and pump it full of steroids
>the diversity i grew up with - good!
>the diversity I saw after graduating high school and college with no sex - bad!
Imagine getting off for someone seething.
Get help, user. You are on a path that destroys you.
The political climate was much different back then. Things weren't done out of spite. Today's they would have made god a black dyke who says anti-white garbage every second sentence. They're not the same and the fact that you made this thread proves that you just don't get it.
>the chuds
go directly back to twitter and then kill yourself, troon
Freeman is an honorary Aryan. And you will never be a woman OP.
Only the christian rednecks would have been upset at this
There was a pornstar (can't remember who) who said she had never done any interracial scenes, this was despite her doing scenes with several black men.
The logic was that race wasn't part of the scene, it was ordinary pornshoots where one of actors happend to be black. As oppose to interracial scenes where the difference in skin colour is the main theme of the porn shoot.
A similiar concept exist in movies and TV shows, Take Kevin Costner's Robinhood were Morgan Freeman play "Azem", apparantly an arab/moor that followed Robinhood to England after they escaped from a prison in the opening scene. Back then it was just a part of the film, Robinhood being abroad, coming home to see his father's castle burned down and his blinded father living in the ruins, and the only thing he brought with him from abroad was a "bodyguard" who was honour-indebted to Robinhood for saving his life.
Today it would be obvious that the introduction of "azeem" would be of the sole purpose of having a black guy in the movie. Back then this was not the case, the character just fitted the abroad story well and looked cool with a saber rather than a broad sword.
Most movies from the 90s, 00s and early 10s, are like this.
I agree, and i hate niggers
this unironically, niggers werent worshipped like gods back then. Plus, morgan freeman isnt a nigger and he hates niggers
Honorary white man
Good post except the first part, fucking coomer.
so does freeman
Nobody hates morgan freeman you silly zoomoid.
Translation: I didn't browse /pol/ back then
Multiculturalism always ends in race wars. Your empire is dead, and we will have white nations again. Try to bait a little better next time, cross dressing retard
>multiculturalism always ends in race wars
>why?
>b-because they just do ok?
>just don't start the war?
>I WILL AND YOU CAN'T STOP ME
If you can't tell the difference between 90s/early 2000s diversity and diversity today then you're a willfully blind retard. In the 90s the message was always about getting along with others, today it's about hating white people.
It's not whites that start the wars, it's Jews and blacks. Read a book tranny. All empires collapse in race wars and debt. Add hedonism, endless propaganda, divorce and drugs and you got all the checks of an empire in decline.
yeah you sound like you grew up in the 90s. give it 5 years and you'll see poltard zoomers spewing the same crap. I can't believe how many people of my generation already act like mental boomers
jews are, objectively, white
If Robin Hood had come out today they would have made one of the Merry Men black and just pretended it was always this way in medieval fucking England. Freeman's character being black was part of the story, it's explained by Robin fighting in the crusades and actually works since it shows that Robin Hood is honorable and won't kill a defenseless warrior even though they were enemies. Very different than just pretending the world was always a diversity rainbow.
zoom zoom
They are white semite mutts that see themselves as a separate nation. They are supremacists.
and we can thankfully agree that white supremacy is bad
No retard, user was right. What new black actor would you compare to Morgan Freeman? Oh, what’s that? You are now realizing you are a fucking retard? Better make another chud statement before it’s to late!
That movie wasn’t taking a part that needed to be a specific race due to location/time period/actual person, and replacing it with a black man for the sake of replacing the role with a black man. Morgan Freeman got work because he was a charming fella. Audiences like him. As that other user said, it would help a great deal if current black actors weren’t hired merely for diversity, but instead, because they earned it in some way. If chuds hated ALL black actors, they’d bitch about the older movies that had them. Fact is, you are wrong, and a massive faggot. /thread
Jewish supremacy. They see themselves as being semites, not whites.
cringe
The guy you replied to is right.
How do you not see this?
There was zero butthurt, nobody cared whatsoever. It was a different time.
Speaking as a chud, I wasn't, he's a critically acclaimed actor with a godly voice.
Push and pull, the more people started making race an issue the more people went into the complete unironic racist stuff.
>chuds
faggot posting
You are no older than 23.
Yes, but there also wasn't an constant pull from the media to make everything about racism. Thus you kinda forced him to go on /pol/ because it was the only place left where he could say whatever he wanted.
How did you know?
literally no one was “triggered” by this, it was a much simpler time.
They are superior.
Translation: I grew up and now I'm sad my childhood is over and I didn't get laid as a teenager
My uncle who works for the KKK was furious, we went to see it as an extended family and he stormed out of the theatre
this
okay, this was pretty funny to read, base unc
If you live in Europe, you are a part of that empire. You have participated, contributed, and benefited every step of the way. If we fall, you fall.
>browsing pol in 2003
Seriously, who pays you?
You guys are so obvious
Because the world at that time didn't have the racial divide that came about as a result of the rich panicking over class warfare and manufacturing racial issues that ceased to exist after 1996.
Good comeback dude. Did you notice how i didn't try any personal attacks or anything. Just trying to explain it to you how the "chuds" in your words and the "trannies" are both responsible for society to go into extremes.
Both sides are really fucking cringe. The fact that leftists make getting laid the central point of their existence and use that as the basis of all criticism doesn't really help anything.
Leftists are truly retarded
Only Muslims were triggered by this.
Tbh I've very briefly explored /pol/. There are more and more outlets (that don't have such right-wing slants) opening up about this bullshit anyways so theres no need for pol.
If imagining that people who don't share your shitty worldview simply don't get laid brings you peace, then more power to you.