I was wronged as a child and a horrible thing was done to me and my family

Semen like his god.

>Odin the allfather will triumph over your god of erections
Amleth was a religious extremist, indoctrinated into the berserker cult at an early age

>murdering your own brother is less bad than killing the man who murdered your father and his allies

This is your brain on cuck liberalism.

Fjolnir had some redeeming moments like when he was teaching his youngest son to cut wood

Well at least its historically accurate

He still came across as a piece of shit and his eldest son was an utter cun

Explain how it's "cuck liberalism".

>Protagonist means good-guy

>My American shrimpbrain must categorize all characters into good/bad, that is all I am capable of

When he was saved by the ravens was that his dad or was it Odin?

protagonist=/=hero of the good
Besides it's Hamlet, so not a question or good/bad.

Aurvandil's spirit

>when that smug archer on the ship shot the slavic kid and father in the beginning
It was done to establish moral ambiguity

>>I am the good guy btw
?

The moral of the story is that women with mental illnesses are the bane of kingdoms and families alike

Attached: faggot.jpg (1280x960, 271.02K)

yeah its called revenge dawg

this nigga be wildin fr

>knocks up woman and bails on her
He do be niggin' fr fr

'yes'

>be a Slav
>finally a movie showing us in a positive light
>Slavs in the movie are sold to slavery murdered and their women bred by viking cocks
I shouldn't be surprised.

At least the Slavic captain of the ship near the end looked kinda cool

Sounds like the protagonist from Vinland Saga before his redemption arc.

Please tell me this movie doesn't end with a "we must end the circle of revenge" message, I want to see the revenge actually being done

they end up reconciling and having gay sex

He gets his revenge

you will be satisfied, its revenge

Thanks

you can tell a movie is pretentious trash when the screenplay tries to create moral ambiguity and screws it up.

That’s Hamlet.

they bury fish in the ground with lye fr fr

you won't be satisfied, but not because it skips the revenge.

you havent even seen it, shut the fuck up you weird bitch.

The critique you’re making is literally the plot of the film. It’s clearly a deconstruction of the classic ‘revenge’ story

you are the definition of a pleb. I'd say stop while your ahead but you've been woefully behind for a long time, sucks to be you

>therefore i must become twenty times worse than the man who wronged me
If that's what it takes, a small price for karmic balance.

Revenge is the best plot for any story and it's irrefutable, you can't debate me, I win

Clearly it is a success if people hold different opinions. Did you think that through?

Oh God, your vengeance may sometimes be slow in coming, but I think that then it is all the more complete

The Vikings were objectively evil people. Barbarian faggots cannot be the protagonists.

why? you trying to "self-insert" tranny?

user you just made me want to watch this movie more

Attached: 1648470414133.gif (252x400, 1.14M)

Attached: Ef99PrHXsAEHHL2.jpg (956x412, 42.91K)

What the fuck are you even talking about retard?

(you) obviously

Well no I'm not a tranny I just have an irrational hatred of Vikings.

>desperate

>Vikings good even tho they invented sailing and sailing is what caused global warming which creates anxiety for innocent trans kids

Attached: 1639832549792.jpg (600x800, 93.12K)

yes you have mental problems thats been well established

I'm the most sane person on earth. Vikings are le bad.

it's cuck liberalism because it upholds the cuck liberal delusion that strangers and your enemies matter as much or more your beloved family members and allies.

this is why liberal cucks prefer to spend money helping foreign refugees than people in their country, and why amongst refugees liberal cucks prefer to help muslim "refugees" immigrate to their country than persecuted christian minorities from the middle east who are actual refugees, because the muslims are more distant and foreign from their group.

the uncle was obviously evil because he betrayed and murdered his own brother who loved him in cold blood . the main character by contrast was good because he only murdered his enemies i.e. the people who allied themselves with the man who murdered his father.

if you disagree then you're a liberal cuck.

huh? the kiddo trannies and actual trannies are really upset this film exists thats what this is

true. there is nothing better to the healthy human mind than revenge.

Milk would have been one of their primary sources of protein moron.

no its really unhealthy as shown in the film you haven't seen

this movie made depicted 10th century white people as savage fucking voodoo tribal niggers. mediterraneans and middle eastern people from 2000 years earlier were more civilized and human.

No, you don't understand. The soijak is saying that.

you have serious mental problems and require immediate medical help, you spastic

wrong retard. it's only unhealthy if you lack the power to get revenge. If you've been wronged and you're powerful enough to get even then revenge is literally the best thing possible.

Only if that's not the case and you clearly lack the power to get revenge is the next best thing to put it to the back of your mind and move on.

>you have serious mental problems and require immediate medical help, you spastic

Attached: FKmBQ41WQA8KCsV.jpg (510x632, 36.95K)

revenge is important but it needs context in this context he was justified, but revenge will ruin your whole life, as shown as always, you have to weigh the consequences v the result, i.e. Revenge

Actually it is "I choose lover over revenge" in this movie. He ends up abandoning the honour and promise of his father to have children. Only reason the traitor dies is because main guy goes back to ensure they aren't followed.

nigger what? you didn't watch the movie

he's right you fucking moron, what you though that them running around on all fours was cool or something lmao