Attack Pearl Harbour without declaring war

>attack Pearl Harbour without declaring war
was declared de facto by americans before the attack
>genocide Nanjing
chinese lie
>sell Korean women into sex slavery
korean lie

so... 2 nukes weren't enough?

even leftists agree with Hiroshima and Nagasaki getting bombed, gg japs

>MUH HECKIN JAPANERINOS AND KRAUTNIGGERINOS DIED BECAUSE LE EVIL AMERICANS DIDNT GIVE THEM WHATEVER THEY WANTED NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Attached: noooooooooooooooooooo.png (466x593, 39K)

>>attack Pearl Harbour without declaring war
a just attack against a mongrel golem people that should be eradicated utterly
>>genocide Nanjing
never happened, its just propaganda
>>sell Korean women into sex slavery
never happened, its just propaganda
>>carry out human experimentation of POWs
never happened, its just propaganda
>>"b-b-but, we're the victims!!!"
they were and still are

This is what tranime does to a man.

Wow it’s almost like children aren’t responsible for the crimes of their forefathers.
Unless you disagree with that, in which case white children deserve what’s coming to them

Attached: 2FFDEB88-4248-4AB3-BF56-1A28CE77920B.png (1080x1015, 68.96K)

Isn't declaring war before attacking kinda gay anyway?

Nips had it coming. I spit on the dead women and children who thought they could support a yellow monkey chimpout on a national and global level

s-shut up thats different

>PREASE, Braddu Pittu… reave my firefry arone!
>not this time, Kawasaki. looks like you better grab a shovel and dig
>NOOOOOOOO
this scene was fucked up lads

>NOOO you can't just kill Chinese people!
How did they repay you for saving them?

We still don't know for certain if Pearl Harbor wasn't a glownigger inside job.
Regardless, what they do with other gooks is their fucking business, not ours. All it takes is a fart in their general direction for tens of millions of gooks to drop dead and hundreds of millions to become cannibals. Stop judging them by your standards.

It’s important to keep in mind that the Japanese suffered as well. As an example, their arms would get really sore after cutting so many civilian heads off

The way its traditionally been done was to deny everything while you mobilize your military and get troops in position, then at the 11th hour formally declare war. Or just surround whichever country until they panic and declare war first, so you have at least the pretense of being the victim. The German manuvering before WWI is fascinating

What crimes did white people commit, phoneposting iTranny? Bringing civilization to subhuman mongrels that literally hadn't even discovered fire, much less inveted the wheel? Oh no, what a hellish disaster! Nooo, the heckin bantu niggerinioooo nooo he now has to shit in a toilet and flush with clean water in exchange of a few worthless diamonds that go to rich ashkenazi jews in america noooooo

Attached: 1644185492299.gif (498x498, 1.75M)

US got them to surrender by basically promising to keep their culture in tact and not force them to accept blame or guilt for war crimes they committed.
Germany might have even got a similar deal if Russia wasn't involved. Instead they were forced to take on shame and guilt as revenge from Russia and eastern states.

>The Japs deserved everything they got.

>your allies are done. surrender unconditionally.
>no
>*boom*
>...okay we will surrender but we have some conditions
>*boom*
>...alright you win america kun

Attached: 1649148744360.png (853x1000, 521.53K)

USA declaring war by sanctions

Pearl Harbor wasn't a surprise attack. It was provoked by the American military blockading Japan and supplying the Soviets. The American military knew the attack was coming. They wanted it, they needed it. They'd already been propagandizing how good the war would be they just needed a reason into it. Every sailor there that day was killed by their own leadership so more of their fellows could be killed.

And also the nuke genocide user.

meds

>attack Pearl Harbour without declaring war
Yes wars usually start as a result of sneak attacks. The USA had already been sending pilots and fighter planes to China to shoot down Japanese planes without declaring war either.
>genocide Nanjing
Obviously not a good thing, but two wrongs don't make a right. If it was wrong to genocide Nanjing, it was wrong to genocide any other city in response.
>sell Korean women into sex slavery
Let's be real, women never need to be "sex slaves" for a conquering army. They do it willingly. It's female nature.
>carry out human experimentation of POWs
Obviously indefensible, but Japan wasn't the only combatant doing shit like this.
>"b-b-but, we're the victims!!!"
Yes, the innocent civilians (mostly little kids and elderly people) were the victims. The militaries and governments were the victimizers. If you think it was ok to bomb Japanese cities because of Pearl Harbor, then you should agree that 9/11 was justified because of the Gulf War.

Attached: 1644598286590.png (220x221, 62.64K)

Who would you rather have as a neighbor the Beautiful Japanese or the satanic kike??

No one of the civilians did any of this stuff.

God I love America

What did 9-11 have to do with the Gulf War?

>this thread again
Nukefags only have two arguments, so let's just get them out of the way:
>two wrongs make a right
>we killed millions to save billions
If you point out that these meme-tier justifications for bombing little kids are morally abhorrent, they will accuse you of being nonwhite and hating America. That's how these threads always transpire.

Attached: 1618254853179.gif (220x180, 602.56K)

They contributed to the war machine

lol why was it the Allies responsibility to keep nipsects workers and drones alive?
Do you feel bad for wiping out an insect hive if some sting you?

>sell Korean women into sex slavery
I agree with the others but these were literally just prostitutes and Koreans are whiny bitches.

They supported the regime and contributed to the production of war materiel on the home front

Muzzie rage against the Great Satan.
>US military attacks retreating Iraqis
>muzzies do 9/11 on American civilians as revenge 10 years later
Not hard to see how this logic is analogous to nukes being a justifiable response to Pearl Harbor.

>Let's be real, women never need to be "sex slaves" for a conquering army. They do it willingly. It's female nature.
MGTOW/Incel alert!!

I would kill 10,000 Jap insects to save the lives of even 100 American GIs, and any other country on the earth would've done the same at the time. Keep seething though chang

Saddam was the aggressor though, just like the Japs were, so this analogy doesn't hold up

>>US military attacks retreating Iraqis
Saddam Hussein's defeat in the Gulf War was the last thing on Osama's mind when he planned the 2001 attacks.

Japan has the moral authority to execute all Americans starting this guy

All white men have the moral authority to sex Asian women starting with this guy's mom

I agree, but Americans must be executed first.

>it's ok to mass murder civilians because they have jobs and pay taxes
lel
>I would kill 10,000 Jap insects to save the lives of even 100 American GIs
So why go around conquering every meaningless island in the Pacific if it was about saving American lives? The Battle of Iwo Jima resulted in 27,000 American dead and several ships sunk to kill 18,000 Japanese. There were several Pyrrhic victories like this.
>Keep seething though chang
And there it is.

Attached: 1638377160377.jpg (250x243, 7.19K)

Attached: MUH_PEARL.jpg (655x530, 214.19K)

Both Iraq and Japan were in the right.

It's just an example. I can't explain exactly why 9/11 happened, but muzzies get butthurt about pretty much anything and kill in response. The point is that it's morally wrong to kill civilians in response to something the military does. In fact, it's even worse to kill civilians who (supposedly) live under an oppressive and totalitarian government, since they theoretically have even less influence over their government and military than people living in Western democracies do.

>So why go around conquering every meaningless island in the Pacific if it was about saving American lives?

To put pressure on the Japanese mainland and home front, while getting strategic bombers in range. If you don't understand the purpose of the island hopping campaign you're too fucking retarded to be on history board. And I thought you yellow chimps were supposed to be smart

Is this actually what they teach in America? We were always taught that the Japanese were ready to surrender but that America wanted to make sure they didn't surrender to the Soviets. You guys are pretty fucked up.

The Japs wanted a conditional surrender but you don't get that when you take the first swing, especially after torturing and mutilating your way across the Pacific. The mutilated bodies of GIs garrisoned on Guam, and the invasion of the Phillipines were fresh in the minds of every American

you ever heard of paragraphs
marone i aint reading all that

Yes. America, and the modern liberal world order at large, keeps WW2 as its foundational myth.
Allies=Good (morally); Axis=Bad

>To put pressure on the Japanese mainland and home front,
We were already doing that by blockading them with submarines. Or are you saying sanctions don't work?
>while getting strategic bombers in range.
Iwo Jima is a small, mountainous island that was useless as a staging base for the army or navy.
>If you don't understand the purpose of the island hopping campaign you're too fucking retarded to be on history board.
This is Yea Forums.
>And I thought you yellow chimps were supposed to be smart
And there it is. It's like pottery.

America needs to be attacked and its civilians slaughtered en masse.
This country actually deserves it.

This! We should nuke all our adversaries.

The fucked up part is that America ended up being very merciful when Japan finally did surrender. If America's actual terms of surrender had been presented to Japan they probably would have gone for it, but instead they kept demanding unconditional surrender.

Yes, Americans think real life is like Hollywood, so most history is taught like this:
>USA = good guys
>anyone USA doesn't like = bad guys

>We were already doing that by blockading them with submarines. Or are you saying sanctions don't work

>OK you're winning too much, can you please take your foot off the gas now?

You're a retard Ping.
Also Iwo Jima paved the way for the Invasion of Okinawa and served as a landing site for thousands of B29s

I hate Imperial Japan and I wish more people were knowledgeable about all the shit they did. They were by far the worst people in WW2.
That said, the way that the USA bombed and firebombed the island with reckless abandon for civilian casualties wasn't right either.
There were innocent children who were killed by the USA but they were such a minority

Fpbp

>the japanese already wanted to surrender
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cherry_Blossoms_at_Night

>two wrongs make a right
We literally dropped flyers telling them a week ahead that we have "the most destructive weapon known to man" and were gonna use it. If those fuckers believed it was a bluff that's on them.
>we killed millions to save billions
That's exactly how war works, fucking retard. It's cost benefit analysis with lives involved, and it's fucked up, but guess what, war is fucked up.

Why are the nukes ever controversial? Nooo, you have to murder thousands and thousands of civilians through months or years of entrenched warfare and collateral damage, not all at once!!! Let's be real, if it were just a lot more regular bombs that did the same amount of damage, would anyone be bitching about this?

Attached: 1649726038048.jpg (1200x800, 223.22K)

>Yes wars usually start as a result of sneak attacks.
le others break the law so that's fine to break it. Retard alert
>The USA had already been sending pilots and fighter planes to China to shoot down Japanese planes without declaring war either.
US have been sending some funds to china because they were the victim of jap aggression. How is that equal to declaring war on japan?
>Obviously not a good thing, but two wrongs don't make a right
you've just said something opposite
>If it was wrong to genocide Nanjing, it was wrong to genocide any other city in response.
at least those japs in nagasaki died in few seconds, not after hours of tortures
>Let's be real, women never need to be "sex slaves" for a conquering army. They do it willingly. It's female nature.
They willingly got abducted, transferred hundreds of miles away from their homes and subjected themelves to rape? sure
>but Japan wasn't the only combatant doing shit like this
so???
>Yes, the innocent civilians (mostly little kids and elderly people) were the victims
Not only were they actively supporting the regime that started the war, but most of jap civilians were being prepared to fight against american army
>If you think it was ok to bomb Japanese cities because of Pearl Harbor, then you should agree that 9/11 was justified because of the Gulf War.
Al Qaeda is not a government and definetely not the Iraqi government, so that's a very dumb comparison
tl;dr ur a retard