And this fine article completely decimates most cringe arguments against it. Heck, it's the best article I've read on any film. Period. And I'm a guy who reads a lot of reviews and analysis and shit. Perfectly captures how people got filtered by the love scene.
Or if you like it in video on it. This one is based on the article.
Other urls found in this thread:
Nolan's worst movie
>blocks your path
>And I'm a guy who reads a lot of reviews and analysis and shit.
No doubt
>The deus ex machina in the story is you, the observer watching the movie, and science tells us that to watch something is to change it. Let me explain…
dropped
>we are the spark that'll light the fuse that'll light the bomb that'll explode inside the death star that'll then not destroy le rebels
it was gay accept it
Seethe. That's very relevant since La Jette was its inspiration(a movie using mostly still images).
Kek worthy line.
I'm not a fag.
It’s unironically his best along with Inception
>not Dumbkirk
Tenet's good, and the weird black dude is actually an excellent casting choice.
This may surprise you, but all movies use still images. Millions and millions of still images. Filmmaking really is a marvelous illusion.
>>>and science tells us that to watch something is to change it
This may surprise you but that movie I'm talking about doesn't create the illusion of a moving picture.
>Heck
Yes. Go on, you don't need my permission to read everyline.
Kek'd.
everything is "character driven" which means retarded feminist drama for women
midwitcore
>Character driven.
This is an ideas driven movie even though it hosts Nolan's most fleshed out characters(which isn't saying much).
Nolan is a decent film maker, I've enjoyed his work (even Tenet) but I see there are still people who hold him as some sort of film messiah.
You're such a loser.
>Midwits don’t really fundamentally understand any form of creative medium. They don’t partake in an aesthetic experience or an artistic reality but just a story. Plotholes matter more than what emotions and themes are evoked. They throw a fit whenever sentimentality is combined with realism in any way because years of cringe millennial pseudo nihilism shit weaned them on the idea that “realistic” things have to be stark and empty and morose. They also place a lot of stock in sticking rigidly to certain dogmas and so when you introduce some sort of metaphysics or emotional element that instantly infringes on the “science and facts” scheme of ideas in their head, it creates a dissonance because they need rigid sets of ideas for what constitutes realistic or not realistic. Add to that midwit insecurity and needing to vociferously assert when they feel they are smarter than the content they consume, and you have the reaction to this movie. I don’t even like it that much myself but it’s a good insight into the mind of a redditor.
Fucking kek.
Also checked.
Brainlet.
Can't believe this has become a pasta.
It's not nice calling Anne Hathaway like that.
>love
C R I N G E
Holy shit nothing is more eye roll inducing that people going on about love shit.
Well if you don't realize why that's wrong and retarded, that's a shame.
No one is interested in your "well the science is more nuanced than that" arguments faggot.
>Prime Mover
this but unironically
Now I get it!
Thank god, You're the one being called that then.
BTFO.
It's not a matter of nuance. It's an incorrect statement.
>and science tells us
Was the author's statement. Have fun in your midwit world.
No, I'm not Anne Hathaway. Otherwise I'd be naked in the bathroom right now, looking at her (my) tits and ass.
Incels literally can't refute this.
tl;dr
It isn't. I know what you're going for but you're too much of a midwit to understand what's being said under context but then again you're too insecure to even read the whole thing. So you can get lost either way.
>what's being said under context
The 5th dimensional alien thing? It's explained at the end of the movie.
God that movie sucked almost as bad as Prometheus.
Alright, why do they need regular humans within the context of the movie?
Yeah, I get it, but the film still sucked.
Probably not, all considering. But regular people are still there for the sake of drama.
He's talking about the observer effect. I suppose your point is that the effects are usually miniscule or negligible?
That shit was on par with some magic floating Doctor Who.
It’s a lovely metaphor and nice film. The time lost is the brainlet liberalism of the last 50 years when the answer was staring us in the face all along.
Tenet sucks. Nothing about it is good.
You'd understand if you weren't atheist.
Atheists don't believe in 5th dimensional aliens?
No the movie is specifically about humans. The 5th dimensional beings are like Dr.Manhattan, experiencing all of time simultaneously. Their limitation is that they can't latch on to a specific moment in time unlike those that experience it linearly(us through our memories).
the movie was ok until they suddenly pull out the anime tier "loves solves everything" bullshit, its just too dumb to be taken seriously at that point
Yeah. It's cool that the 5th dimensional aliens were there to save us.
To save themselves*
It doesn't. That's why I told you to read the article.
They're the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends dimensions of time and space.
Unironically a great article. Lucy(2014) talks about something similar but muh soicence fags are too up their ass to recognize it. It borrows from Spinozas ideas to create a 5th dimensional godhead.
en.m.wikipedia.org
I also hate science. I'm a creationist.
No, no they aren't. They literally just future humans unbound by time.
t. incel
You're a retarded faggot, dude.
So it's a slide show?