Fuck you, I liked it

>Shartistan
What?

Negro is an offensive word, they are called americans

I don't care if someone is gay or even trans, as long as it's not some focal point or bullshit part of the story like theres some moral lesson learned out of this.

I don't see the appeal at all with these movie. HP was enjoyable growing up but all this prequel stuff feels so unnecessary even when compared to The Hobbit.

The Hobbit wasn't unnecessary though, the book came out before Lord of the Rings

90% of what comes out these days is unnecessary prequel/sequel/spin-off shit.

How the fuck is this movie even remotely related to "Fantastic Beasts"? The fuck is Newt Scamander doing fucking around with Dumbledore and Voldemort? Why is Rowling allowing her work to be brutalized like this?

>Why is Rowling allowing her work to be brutalized like this?
>allowing
She's not "allowing" anything. She wrote this fucking travesty herself lol.

>Voldemort
There is no Voldemort here. He wasn't even born yet. You can't be this stupid, can you?

>gay dialogue
How much fagshit is in it?

Fantastic Beasts?

Attached: burgers.png (472x471, 71.31K)

it takes place in america

Can some kind frens give me a QRD on the pozz level? What pozz things occur in this film? Want to gague if I wanna bother.

The entire movie revolves around two gay characters and their breakup.

What alludes to that?
Or do they straight up make out on screen.

My bad I meant Grindelwald lol

There is a confession scene.

It's okay. There's some likeable character stuff and it's fun how much of it is set up as a spy movie but you'll probably forget it right after it's over.

Depends on what you mean by "modern agenda". The series is basically Rowling trying to write a parable about the rise of fascism which is sort of relevant again, but you can also tell that she's not really historically or sociologically literate enough to add any meaningful commentary to that premise.

I was wondering this as well. I thought Newt was just a very minor character in the books and was only mentioned as th author of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. The first movie I can see being made as it highlights his adventures about finding and studying these beasts...but how come he's suddenly like an Auror or some shit and getting into wizard battles with Grindelwald. Did he always have this backstory or was it just introduced in these movies?

Attached: abz7OZ8_700b.jpg (700x630, 67.98K)

Give the details, man

What does that mean. They fuck? Do they kiss and say WERE GAY or is it just Sam and frodo bro time that fags are all freaking out over going like OMG S O D O M Y I'M GONNA GROOOOOOOOM

Are you being ironic here, because this is actually what's going to happen.

Attached: cr.jpg (753x395, 151.8K)

Browse the archive and find out:

Only a confession. No kiss or anything else. China removed six seconds of dialogue, two lines that outright say they love each other. That's litterally it

Would watching the #ChineseCut be worth it?

Probably the original idea was making pokemon movies but then JK realized that the whole Grindelwald Dumbley gay shit was more interesting to write so they shifted gear mid-production, but couldn't drop the pokemon shit because they were too deep into that shit. And now these movies are these weird combination of two when they should have just been 2 separate series

I think there is very little you can do with the concept of a magical zoologist in a series of films... It would get repetitive. Hence they needed to expand the plot somehow, and HP fans are obviously more invested in the 'old' cast like Dumbledore, his brother etc., so there was only one way the entire franchise could go. It was inevitable.

Attached: 574653748.jpg (1920x1139, 189.46K)

Wow. They managed to assemble the most overrated actors ever to make spinoff garbage.

How much of a pussy are you that you take offense to two sentences where a man mentions having had romantic feelings for another man bother you?

You're retarded. Grow up.

>And now these movies are these weird combination of two when they should have just been 2 separate series
Probably. I'd say it's still possible to mesh the two together seamlessly, but you need the skill for that. This entire thing would work much better as a TV show.

Attached: Secrets-of-Dumbledore-trailer-5-1024x428.png (1024x428, 263K)

Fags of all kinds are walking petri dishes of disease. And given their track records of abuses and criminal tendencies, should not be in a children's film.

>Dumbledore and Grindelwald were gay
>both considered some of the most powerful wizards
>Voldemort was pretty much asexual
>called one of the most powerful dark lords of all time
So is the lesson here that shacking up with a witch makes you a weaker wizard? Is that why Harry was basically above average in most fields, cause he fell for the ginger pussy trap?

I like Harry Potter but not faggots. Thinking about how everything in this movie is being driven by Dumbledore (harry potter's beloved teacher and father figure) and his insatiable lust for the literal oozing hairy shitholes of men and using the shit sphincter to jerk off just doesn't hold my interest. It's gross really.

It's true
You get wizard powers after 30 is you stay clean.

Imagine a hypocritical retard like that browsing Yea Forums and never flinching at the crap he sees here. Yet a homo confession is somehow triggering. So much that he begs for censorship and totalitarianism. Funny, disgusting and pitiful at the same time.

Attached: the absolute state of.jpg (2048x1606, 342K)

>Males of all kinds are walking petri dishes of disease
Corrected that for you.

>heh we're censoring whites in old films
>WHAT?? YOU CANT JUST NOT SAY GAY
Don't Say Gay bill is real and will luckily keep you pedo rapist fucks far away from public schools for a long time.
Not sure why it was necessary but you brought us here somehow.

No matter how much polyjuice you chug, you're still a man in denial with nothing good in his life.

>Voldemort was pretty much asexual
>called one of the most powerful dark lords of all time
He was only powerful because he could respawn (divided his soul, so he could resurrect when one body dies). On his own, he wasn't a big deal. He mostly relied on his followers, they could be quite powerful.

You people have issues.

Women have a higher tendency for collecting those dirty pokemons, anons.

t. uses diarrhea to help lube man's dick and let him use your ass to jerk off

You masturbate to faeces or something?

You need 100% dedication to practising and researching magic to excel as a wizard. Having a love interest and family is an obstacle to that.

No I'm not gay.

>nip sales
weeb

How dare you...

I'll have you know we're not all niggers here sir

Why is it such a sausagefest?

It has it's moments, but it's a distinct heel turn from the first one - I get that the first one was just setting up the characters, but..they're okay. Not great. It has it's moments, but I felt like they were trying to do too much in it. Now that she's planning, what, 5 of them? 6? God knows how convoluted the story will get.

I think they wasted the Queenie/Jacob arc. Those two have great chemistry, she was a good, solid character, and I just feel like her turning bad was pointless.

Rowlings retconned Voldemort to have fucked Balltrix and had a daughter with her, for the play. So your little theory is now null and void.

Always count on Rowlings to retconn the fuck out of her books.

And, before you splutter in rage like the incel you are, it's canon. it's in the play Harry Potter and the Curse Child.

So, Voldemort had sex at least once. Which is one more time than you.