Supposed crime spree spanning 60 years

>supposed crime spree spanning 60 years
>not a single shred of documented evidence
>supposed victims comprise old roasties LARPing on message boards
>numerous police forces in the UK declined to pursue investigation due to lack of evidence
>since his death these allegations have continued to be completely unfounded
>considered guilty in court of public opinion
>headstone removed, name stricken from any and all accomplishments in life, legacy forever in ruins

And why? Because he was "a bit weird"? The whole case against him appears to be built around some forum posts (with about the same level of veracity as a Yea Forums shitpost) which were made decades after the alleged assaults. Why is this enough to undo a lifetime of charitable work and millions raised for good causes?

Did the Netflix documentary fuck up the story, or was the case against him really this paper thin?

Attached: licensed-image.jpg (1477x2048, 583.86K)

Other urls found in this thread:

wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

ew was he jewish too? what's with the little hat?
explains his behavior

if he looks like a pedo and hangs out with British Royalty he is a pedo to me, simple as

Don't think this is the hill to die on desu

Same energy

Attached: pedo.jpg (267x287, 20.65K)

I'm genuinely curious, because the documentary didn't put forth a very convincing case yet we were supposed to just take it as fact that he was guilty

Please explain to me the motivation of 400+ women coming forward to make accusations after his death with no hope of getting a payday out of it. What do they have to gain from it? And what are the chances that all 400+ of those women would lie? Either you’re too retarded to apply even a modicum of logic, or you’re simply trying to protect one of your own kind. So which is it?

If this was a private individual I would get it, but this guy was an icon for millions of kids growing up, even a tiny % of them being nuts and latching onto some idea that they had some extra relationship is possible.

All of that aside, I really don't know, is there solid proof or not?

>what are the chances that all 400+ of these women would lie

user I...

>diehard fan defends a serial molester and abuser even when everything points to the contrary
I could see it desu

You either believe the evidence or you dont.

> even a tiny % of them being nuts and latching onto some idea that they had some extra relationship is possible
Possible? Absolutely, in fact I wouldn’t even doubt it that a small percentage of these accusers will have a delusional parasocial relationship that lead them to made accusations where they didn’t happen. But the likelihood that ALL accusers were lying is next to impossible.

As for the lack of solid proof, you have to appreciate that Saville had been preying on women for decades. It’s hard enough finding physical evidence for sexual abuse, let alone finding it years after the fact. Also remember the kind of powerful circles that Saville moved in, he had a level of protection and immunity that we can only dream about.

>no hope of getting a payday out of it

Are you fucking serious? They shit tons of money from the tabloids

>And what are the chances that all 400+ of those women would lie?

Lmao have you fucking met a woman? Same as how nowadays Twitter nobodies can lie and try to cancel random people without a shred of evidence.

He looks like a paedophile who rapes kids. So did Michael Jackson. That's evidence enough for me.

He was such a charismatic, genuinely good man. He did so much for the British people and working class communities. It's a travesty how much they've destroyed his image. All because he didn't play by their rules. He was useful to the royal family until he wasn't anymore, that's why the cut ties with him and tarnished his image.

No he came from a Catholic family.

> They shit tons of money from the tabloids
No newspaper wanted to touch the story until long after Saville was dead. Multiple reporters tried to break it but their editors wouldn’t allow it. The fact that he was so well-connected and influential should tell you everything as to why the truth was suppressed for so long.

> Lmao have you fucking met a woman?
Clearly I’ve met more than you if your only point of reference is insane people on Twitter. Stop being an eternally online degenerate and go outside

>That scene in the Netflix doc where the female TV presenter tries to say the camera was lying and she didn't love every minute of his flirtations

That's fucking it, that's the proof that women can lie. That fucking bitch was coping so hard. "I-i'm laughing and joking with him b-but really inside I w-was terrified". What a cunt.

why would anyone enjoy flirting with this guy, pedophile or not. he acts like a creep man

Bruh if some fat nationally-loved zany bitch was on your sofa and you were interviewing her, you'd probably try and go along with her crass sexual jokes to avoid the show becoming awkward. It's what professionals do.

Honestly at this stage, suicide is probably the best long-term option for you.

Attached: Bad Father.jpg (313x475, 36.8K)

That makes literally no sense. For them to associate so closely with him only to throw him under the bus after he died would reflect incredibly badly on the royal family. It’s not just his reputation they’re tarnishing but their own by making false accusations.

He looks so much like my dad, I hate that. My dad was a notorious pedophile too. He bought my mom when she was 13 from her crackhead parents for $300 when he was 35 and kept her prisoner in his home deep in the country where no one could help and kept her there for 4 years until she escaped. Also he killed at least 12 people that I'm aware of. Good thing he is dead now. I found one of the dead bodies down by the creek buried in a shallow grave

why are you always posting this, it has to be the same guy or handful of fags. this site's content is like 50% schizo spam at this point.

Should we all support Jimmy Savile by buying his books and anything related? Would that money go to charity, or would it get devoured by ravage feminists??

wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile

I walk past the Leeds hospital he was alleged to have touched up dead folks daily in, AmA

He was a pedo rapist user, you are just being a contrarian poltard

he's a crypto jew then

Rape is a meme ya pinhead

>about the same level of veracity as a Yea Forums shitpost

ironic...

>Meme
Raping mentally ill hospital patients

You’re ugly and undesirable and that means women don’t want to have sex with you. ergo, rape is very much real.

>le epic devils advocate

KEK. Watching these newfags rage at this pro saville shitposting is too funny.

Attached: 565C96E2-0BE6-47DE-B694-00D4147AD197.jpg (1297x1080, 390.01K)

the netflix documentary did do a shit job of providing evidence.
it is there though. him being a nonce was an industry open secret just like harvey weinstein's allegations were.
he has a long history of documented visits to children's wards and centres doing unusual things and some of them even banning him.

Disgusting

Attached: 7BD76F59-DED0-482E-BD15-6579E18E36F9.jpg (853x1000, 237.31K)

Quit promoting degeneracy faggot. Do you want women to be whores and be raped or women to be monogamous? Pick one.

the little hat in the op pic suggests that he is just a victim of a multi-generational smear campaign

I want them to be treated like what they are; property.

You might be the biggest idiot to ever post on Yea Forums.

>not a single shred of documented evidence
What are you talking about? There were multiple investigations that popped up over the decades; the rationale as to why they weren't followed through to a conclusion is easily contextualized/understandable given his power and position alongside the lack of initiative and communication between police forces.
>numerous police forces in the UK declined to pursue investigation due to lack of evidence
The keyword there is 'numerous.' I've already broadly stated why it's clear they weren't followed through on but I'll add to it that he sued a few accusors into oblivion and even used that threat against a police officer who was just interviewing him.
>The whole case against him appears to be built around some forum posts
No. See above. The number of posts created a trail of evidence that finally connected people who had suffered abuse at his hands. You can argue they were hearsay but that wasn't the point of them being brought up--the ability of instantaneous mass communication and the impetus of him dying sparked the connection and interest which was lacking while he was committing his crimes.

Don't confuse this with a #Metoo witch hunt. The mob lacks reality testing but the details are there (your being blind to them implies you're part of the smaller contrarian mob using the same logic).

Attached: _91455305_hi001489937.jpg (640x360, 38.51K)

whoever made this was fucked in the head

Attached: Peter Sutcliffe Jimmy Savile Frank Bruno.jpg (615x409, 44.7K)

So to be raped or to be in monogamous relationships?

Tons of celebrities knew about it, too, or at least there were many rumors. I think it was Johnny Rotten that I saw got banned from BBC or something for mentioning it back in the 80s, so it wasn't a huge secret.

kek

That meme is one of the greatest pieces of bait I have ever seen.

Attached: 562.png (1597x1600, 627.39K)

Attached: 07B0A075-DAFC-4E61-981C-7042338F13FF.jpg (1115x894, 230K)

is this what has replaced the thunderbrd threads?
i'm waiting to tell everyone how i was the first to post a comment noticing the discrepancy of thunderbird 4 being a thunderbird and the other thunderbird 2 equiptment not being a thnderbird
i have personally concluded that it is because in an emergency, thunderbird 4 could be launched directly without thunderbird 2, while e.g. the rock drills or platforms could not

Women need to be raped. It is the only language they understand. Women enjoy rape. Don't let them tell you otherwise, because they are notorious liars and don't know their own minds. Women want to be held down and fucked hard. They want to be made to cry and scream. Women have a biological imperative to be raped. Did you know that women who are raped are twice as likely to conceive as women who have unprotected consensual sex? It is a fact. Women who are raped often have orgasms as well - some women have never had an orgasm in their lives save for a rape. The desire to be sexually dominated is deeply programed into the woman. This is a fact of evolution that cannot be denied without women becoming unbalanced. Feminism is really just an outward manifestation of an internal problem with modern women. These 'feminists' desperately want to be put in their place. That's why they act out so much and are so belligerent. Whether they know it or not, subconsciously they want to piss men off and get men to make them submit. They want to be slapped in the face, told to shut the fuck up, and then raped until they can't stand up. This is what women really want. I say we give it to them.

faggot

just because women don't consent to having sex with me doesn't mean me molesting them counts as rape

>headstone removed
Can they do that?

It’s a Netflix documentary, which means it’s about as accurate as CNN or Buzzfeed. What a crock of shit, dragging a dead man’s name through the mud.

now then now then

trans rights!

Anglogermcucks suffer from cognitive dissonance from desperately wishing they were European instead of the Asian migrants that they are. This causes them to have lots of mental issues like pedophilia and transvestitism. Many such cases..,

Attached: 8FD093A3-8800-4C1E-AB4A-1C35A15772A2.jpg (1528x2395, 420.69K)

> just because women don't consent to having sex with me
That’s the literal definition of rape. All the mental gymnastics in the world won’t change that uggo

>Being such a contrarian that you jump back and forth between accusing everyone you don't agree with of being pedo groomers and simping/defending a child diddling rapist

Now that's dedication

Attached: 42C66BBE-2435-48DF-AF8F-84C68461C048.jpg (555x1200, 66.23K)

If they're worried about vandalism or desecration, you're damn right they can.

no it isn't, it's having sex without the permission of a woman or child's male guardian

Today, user spent his free time defending Jimmy Saville on the internet.
A friendly reminder that the clock is ticking and the time spent cannot be taken back.

Reminder that you’re not a true channer unless each of your multiple personalities have at least one mental illness.