Why didnt she follow orders?

She wanted to do things by the book

she's a woman

I liked how Villeneuve bamboozled the audience by introducing le strong female character only to show her as a weak retards who is manipulated and duped by some meatheads

It was a horrible character and acting too.

She was just doing things by the book

Attached: 1635622888392.png (918x820, 833.75K)

Her boss straight up told her the rules have changed.
It turned out that nobody really wanted her, they just needed her for some legal loophole bullshit. She couldn't handle being used.

uh huh

Everyone else was doing illegal things

Attached: 1597460479866.jpg (1116x1011, 115.53K)

Nothing will make sense to your American ears, and you will doubt everything that we do, but in the end you will understand.

Yeah that's the whole point of her character. She's not a ridiculous tough chick characature. She's in way, way over her head, under the mindunderstanding that she's there to contribute her 'expertise' and not just as a beaurocratic loophole to allow the spooks to operate on US soil. By the end of the movie she's totally fucked up after being dragged around by the actual tough guys and wants nothing to do with any of it.
Pretty damn good film.

what do you expect? look at the state of burgerland

>character actually cares about civil rights and following the law
heh... what a stupid typical woman

Attached: 1605909272831.png (600x800, 11.24K)

Could she have filed a report against them and got them arrested?

>These decisions are made far from here, by officials elected to office, not appointed to them. So, if your fear is operating out of bounds, I am telling you, you are not.
How many times does this dumb broad have to hear it before she gets with the program?

>some politicians said it's ok therefore the law and the constitution doesn't matter

>worry about the rights of dirty foreign combatants
This is why war is the province of men, you dumb hole

She did nothing wrong technically. She was just following the rules. Rule breakers are cringe.

yeah because judicial overreach and civil rights infringement only targets foreigners right? it's not like the national security complex is in the middle of a massive drive to paint "domestic terrorists" as the greatest threat to the american state. the jan 6 "insurrection" proves it's necessary after all.

God she sucked in that film. Her retarded sanctimonious woke cunt character, and her pet token black man sidekick, were irrelevant to the whole film.

How are you supposed to fight an enemy that is formless and disorganized and does not follow any known laws of war? The constitution doesn't provide us with any guidance on how to do that. There's no way the founding fathers could have known that to the south there would be armies of subhuman savages willing to slaughter masses of innocent civilians and put them up for public display in order to protect their profits.
The idea that the law is absolute and sacred and immutable is for women and children.

ironically you display a much more stereotypical "female mentality" with blind adherence to authority figures in the face of a percieved threat. meanwhile, blunt's character has principles and maintains them even when doing so goes against the demands of her superiors. a classic male coded trait. she's out of her depth, but morally she's completely in the right.

The only reason she can maintain her principles is because she lives in a warm cocoon of security provided by people who are willing to get their hands dirty for the greater good. She is naive to the threats of the real world.

They specifically chose her to go with them because she was a dumb woman who would sign off on their illegal actions in the end. They say this in the movie

>mexicans are killing each other therefore we need to ignore the constitution and laws reigning in unaccountable agencies like the CIA
truly convincing argument. the exact same moral hysteria can (and will) be deployed domestically against trumpers, second amendment advocates, militias etc. after all the founding fathers didn't expect mass shootings or capitol insurrections either.

she should have stayed on the farm

Attached: pepecowgod.jpg (1148x746, 135.6K)

Why didn't she just leave when she was given the opportunity and then write up a report condemning them?

she wasn't stupid or some strong independent womxn
she was just too good and naive and got played by glowies

Just when she tried to get out, they pulled her back in

>the exact same moral hysteria can (and will) be deployed domestically against trumpers, second amendment advocates, militias etc.
Conjecture. But you know what, you're right. When the drug war starts pouring over the border and you get your face cut off and your corpse hung from an underpass you can feel good about defending the rights of the poor foreign savages

Too bad the sequel ruined everything

She was a good righteous person working with sociopaths.

>There's no way the founding fathers could have known that to the south there would be armies of subhuman savages willing to slaughter masses of innocent civilians and put them up for public display
you've mad a lot of terrible arguments but this one takes the cake. the founding fathers lived through actual wars threatening the existence of the american nation and the american people. british imperialism, indian tribes, later on mexico itself for that matter. that is the context in which the constitution was written - during an active existential conflict with a foreign power. the idea that some gay ass cartels killing each other in mexico would be an unimaginable horror that would merit demolishing laws and rights is completely laughable.

This

conjecture? it's happening right now lol. your hysteria about cartels is honestly hilarious though, at this point i hope you're trolling.

EU here. Why cant the government just kill all the Mexican criminal gangs?

Dogbrain

I thought this film would be cool but I kinda hated it. Same with Arrival. Fuck villynoov. DUNC was a lot better than I expect though, wtf

>Just prosecute carte blanche CIA spooks and their private military contractors

She was just a patsy liason there as a legal loophole. She was in over her head and she knew it.

Incels be seething.

Because Alejandro told her she'd be committing suicide

"Just when i think im out.. they pull me back in".

Democrats and leftists would get butthurt . Mexico would get butthurt too but we wouldn't care

Ok then why didnt she just leave early in the movie and say she didnt want to take part after she saw the way they operated?

same guy directed BR2049

Why cant the mexican government just kill them?

Read a fuckin book. The things that the colonists did to the natives and Mexicans would be condemned as war crimes today. It didn't even occur to them to question whether or not they were infringing upon the rights of foreigners or how far the constitution allowed the to go in defending their people. Glowies conducting targeted precision operations today are relatively tame.

I thought she was good in the movie and her character was good. Why all the hate? Why is anyone saying it's woke when it literally makes it a point to subvert those expectations?

Movie would have been better if Emily Blunt had a nude scene

Because she wanted to get payback for the agents murdered under her watch but didn't truly grasp what she had signed up for until the end of the operation

Hysteria? Are you suggesting those things aren't actually happening? Or that they could never happen in the US? Because that's incredibly naive.

The gangs are the government.

This scene came out of nowhere

Attached: o206h1tuceb51.jpg (1564x1564, 173.71K)

another moronic argument, but it's not even relevant to the point at hand. the discussion pertains to the CIA spooks and others in the movie flagrantly breaking laws and trampling civil rights within the United States itself. whether or not you believe that foreign nationals should be afforded basic rights is actually completely besides the point. government agencies like the CIA do not get to arbitrarily ignore laws and regulations just because "CARTELS BAD" or "elected politicians said so".

Taking her partner's black cock?