ITT

Dishonest filmmaking

Attached: FB_IMG_1649732817861.jpg (640x640, 48.18K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/sLxxbfsj8IM
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

what's dishonest about it?

Attached: 1636160161608.jpg (124x124, 2.65K)

shoulda filmed in an actual futuristic hellscape like new york

Could have just gone to Lagos for the same experience

What was the purpose of the crane and the green screen?

Attached: 1649470666685.gif (498x374, 3.54M)

Honest filmmaking

Attached: ra721.jpg (1053x1053, 253.69K)

>Dishonest filmmaking

Attached: 1635264303699.jpg (1920x800, 585.08K)

To work around gosling easier

It's easier to work with a green screen and the actor is the focus of the scene. The work around the actor needs to be perfect, as the focus of the scene. You eye hits the car first, then flows up to the actor, then it spreads to the horizon skyline. Preserving the fidelity of the practical aspects of the show is vital.

Imagine being able to make a city look like whatever you can imagine, and choosing to make that.

To cut out the silhouette walking to the cityscape (like with Mocha) while using the location (instead of going full Marvel fakeness)

>Dishonest filmmaking

Attached: 1643053154088.jpg (709x295, 30.85K)

HE SAY YOU BRADE RUNNAH

He was probably the only thing moving in the shot. Everything else was mostly still. Going into every single frame and editing around him in every single frame would be incredibly difficult. In the the areas not moving very much it’s easier.

>dishonest
do you even know the meaning of the words you type? what a faggot

I miss this about the original. It had a seriously slimy dirty Chinese feel, like those nasty parts of china, places where they sell bootleg everything and everything’s falling apart and yet kind of futuristic at the same time, filled with smog. It had a cool overlap with noire shit from the 40s. Yet in the new blade runner it just felt like a sleek soulless world. It just didn’t capture the sake feeling and felt more like half baked futuristic liminal spaces.

Attached: 1F6A2AD2-AC50-4119-98D4-789125BD3160.gif (498x278, 2.61M)

What the fuck is this?

>Ellen Page's nipples in the scene with Kate Mara get censored
>This is allowable

I'm pretty sure they got real garloids to film that scene. Nothing dishonest about that.

Arrakeen

I beg to differ. Garloids used in film are notoriously treated improperly as they are one of the most exploited animals in the entertainment industry. Disney, especially, gets their garloids from the shadiest garloid trainers.

why is this shot so comforting

the crane is holding up the greenscreen u div

can't believe the artist used a ruler to draw a straight line, what a big fat phony baloney pony

Attached: MV5BNmNiOWVmODYtNDVkMS00NDNkLTk1NGItZjBmOTJmODBlMTI1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTc3MjUzNTI@._V1_.jpg (700x394, 156.09K)

>Dishonest filmmaking

Attached: 6753.jpg (660x440, 26.09K)

Attached: incep.jpg (550x413, 66.44K)

Why didn't he just shave? Was it a power move?

during the reshooting, he was already in the filming of Mission Impossible Fallout so shaving it would conflict it

Attached: CsmsPZBUIAAL0Vj.jpg (553x686, 67.89K)

>"They painted my t**s on me for the films, which is extraordinary because it's kind of a dying art form - in the past, they used to have whole sections of the studios devoted to bosom make-up.

>"And I loved it, completely loved it. Because it was the first time in my life I had big t**s, and I didn't even need surgery.'

>She said the process of creating the cleavage took 45 minutes every morning before filming started.

dishonest... low

Attached: celebrity-trends-2012-12-keira-knightley-orlando-bloom-pirates-of-the-caribbean.jpg (424x424, 42.93K)

why is he considered a complex enough object to warrant a green screen but the car and landscape aren't?

This actually makes me mad. Unreasonably so. I've been bamboozled since 11

Attached: antonio banjo.png (755x472, 489.56K)

hes moving

Attached: 1554995029548.webm (1252x720, 859.32K)

the lack of grittines and texture and overall soul. fuck this minimalist bullshit.

How? She's so fucking flat in every other film, how would this fool you?

I don't really see the problem here, that looks like a city that regularly gets blasted by scorching heat and sandstorms

>I don't really see the problem here

Attached: me irl 2.png (476x476, 362.43K)

The goose is moving so it would be hard to crop around him and blend him into the environment without the greenscreen

Dishonest Filmmaking:(Tarantino, Andrei Tarkovsky, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Wes Anderson, Christopher Nolan, James Cameron, Alex Garland, Paul Thomas Anderson, Nicholas Refn, Tom Hooper, Tyler Perry, Gaspar Noe, The Coen Brothers, Noah Baumbach, Denis Vilenueve, James Franco, Damien Chazelle, Robert Eggers, Akira Kurosawa) are intellectually bankrupt moral whores and charlatans; their films appeal to the modern phenomenon of the 'Pretend Epic' or Pseudo Cinema, often tied to the criticism that "It was a movie that thought it was a film" they have no ideas of their own and are filmed purely to have fancy essays made about them. They obfuscate their lack of insight under a smug impenetrable irony and often contain scenes with disingenuous attempts at depth with characters spouting platitudes that the director takes VERY seriously. This directly panders to the IMDb reddit sensibility of quote circlejerking since these hacks are masters of the fools wit, "Quipping" (Not to be confused with the marvel co-opting of the word) , it sounds smart, cool and worldly but in reality there's nothing of substance.

THIS is Dishonest Filmmaking.

They leech the greater works that preceded them; like The Enemy being a rip off Eraserhead, but they have nothing else to say.They act under the guise of deconstruction with surface layer obvious 'social commentary' and a quirky forgettable score praised as 'innovative'. They are all inauthentic sycophants that rely on oscar buzz and post 9/11 detachment for relevance.

These directors are hacks and will be forgotten to time. Some notably earnest filmmakers include, but are not limited to:

Werner Herzog

John Carpenter

Richard Stanley

David Lynch

John Boorman

Sam Peckinpah

Jackie Chan

Kenji Misumi

John Milius

Stephen Norrington

Michael Winner

Yoshiaki Kawajiri

Clint Eastwood

Mel Gibson

Attached: EC83C330-D2A9-4A62-9081-1F908182D351.jpg (750x427, 328.82K)

So what IS the problem?

kek

Anything that is made by Denis Villanova is dishonest.

Didn't read
Lose weight fatty

yeah I saw the other guys response and ducked out of the thread for an hour hoping no one would call me a retard

>Retard

Remember when movies wanted to show apocalyptic settings they had to film in real derelict locations? Now they just stick some sand in a parking lot and greenscreen everything. No sovl.

Attached: Derelict.jpg (612x408, 48.79K)

halogen and neon lighting instead of LED

Lighthouse had jumpscares.

Attached: MV5BNDE4OTMxMTctNmRhYy00NWE2LTg3YzItYTk3M2UwOTU5Njg4XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjU0OTQ0OTY@._V1_.jpg (1600x2400, 1.15M)

Go to bed, Armond.

BR2049 properly uses it special effects for the most part though. There's nothing wrong with a digital background of a huge city.

youtu.be/sLxxbfsj8IM

Tyler Perry??

David Lynch is everything you just described.

extremely based

looks like the whole city was covered in a sheet of plastic and vacuum sealed

>CTRL F
>no Sergio Leone
You're dishonest

Not what dishonest filmmaking is. It's when the director tricks the audience into thinking something is real when it's not. (Notice how Gosling stops playing when the camera is not on him, it's all fake)

Attached: 1649404055873.webm (480x480, 2.93M)

the russian remake is much better

Attached: 1607395133517.webm (352x640, 1.51M)

More like dishonest Mark Hamill. He's smiling and laughing on the set and eager to cash a paycheck but after the fact, he goes on rants and makes veiled jabs in media appearances.

Attached: 1641332014191.jpg (1526x1962, 613.24K)

Wtf? Why is this not international news?