What are some certified HDR kinos? Stuff that really makes use of the dynamic range

most of it is honestly mediocre but from what i've seen that's been superior from the rest (on UHD 4K blu)
The Ten Commandments
Spartacus
LOTR trilogy *minus the questionable color shifts in certain parts
Cliffhanger

>>but hdr is a meme
>t. someone who has never seen real hdr
it's a meme I bet you believe the UHD alliance as well

They have to be watchable films, not merchandise commercials. Retard.

Being analog means they have a dynamic range in excess of HDR retard.

BR2049 was not a good show case of HDR. The entire movie is fairly flat in its dynamic range.

>The blue in the barracks looks fukken good

HDR is not "colours". Wide Gamut and 30bit colour (10bpp) are apart of the specification, but are just an aside to what HDR actually is. Which is very high brightness offset by very high contrast ratios to make bright lights more naturally bright and isolated.

HDR is trash Dolby Vision is superior due to bitmapping

Dolby Vision is just a specification of HDR retard. HDR10, HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision are all "HDR".

The Spiderverse flick has some of the best HDR around. Now whether you want to watch it is another matter.

DvSUX guy on rarbg who made the Dexter New Blood torrents are fucking CRISP.
You need a tv with dolby vision to fully appreciate

BR2049 HDR doesn't look that good imo

A lot of that going around with Atmos too. I suppose that soon, even mid range home setups will be beyond the full use of anything but new productions, baring the release of masters

Is there any non-4k blu-ray that does HDR? I don't have a 4k player

do you have a smart tv?

Yeah

download plex server on your pc
download plex on your tv
torrent kino to your pc
stream from your pc to your tv

Attached: sloth-lazy[1].gif (245x184, 1.32M)

Like this user suggest if you don't have a player then download your 4k HDR content. In theory HDR could be applied to 1080p releases, but then that would negate one of the marketing tactics for pushing 4k media. If suddenly the only difference between a bluray release and a 4k release of a 2k intermediate is a slight upscale then these studios would have even more trouble trying to sell this stuff.

it takes like 10 minutes to set up, stop being lazy

I'd buy their 4K blu rays if they didn't charge $30-50 for them most of the time

just get the file then put it on some usb storage device and ram it into your tvs usb boipussy and watch it like that

even the cheapest shittiest chink ewaste tvs have had usb media playback for decades

There is still a benefit to 4k releases depending on the disc type used and the amount of data put on it. Obviously the REMUX you download is a direct copy of that disc's content, but you'd be surprised at how large a standard 2k release can be. The Apocalypse Now 2k DCP REMUX 5.1 FLAC that you can easily find on the seven seas is 200gb. That's the file theaters would use to play Apocalypse Now on their projector. You can imagine then how large an uncompressed 4k file would be.

Do USBs even have the read speeds for 4k content?

>USB 2.0/Hi-Speed: 480 Mbps.
>USB 3.0/SuperSpeed: 5 Gbps.
>USB 3.1/SuperSpeed: 10 Gbps.

Considering the highest 4k bitrates are around 100mbps at peak, I think you're good chief.

It was always clear. Stop falling for marketing gimmicks, remember when they brought 3D back?

Oh, you are just a specsfag. Fuck off.

I remember thinking Aquaman looked really good with it

4k file can be between 40-100gb depending on it's length.

Lets say 80gb for 2h film which is a good high end bandwidth scenario.

80 GB is 655,360 MiB
655,360 / 120 = 5,461 MiB a minute
5461 / 60 = 91 MiB a second
91 MiB/s = 11.3 MB/s

USB2.0 has a maximum of 53 MB/s.

Aquaman actually has ridiculously good CGI for a capeshit movie

2001 with Dolby vision is jaw dropping. So clean and colorful and crisp that i shed a tear watching the first blue Danube scene

>no you can't understand the specifications and why and how they are useful no you just need to press play

typical american stupidity

Looking into it more...
>USB 2.0 was released in April 2000, adding a higher maximum signaling rate of 480 Mbit/s called High Speed, in addition to the USB 1.x Full Speed signaling rate of 12 Mbit/s. Due to bus access constraints, the effective throughput of the High-Speed signaling rate is limited to 35 MB/s or 280 Mbit/s.

>4k Blu-Rays: The specification allows for three disc capacities, each with its own data rate: 50 GB at 72 or 92 Mbit/s, and 66 GB and 100 GB at 92, 123 or, 144 Mbit/s.

So even at the realistically slower real-world speeds of USB 2.0, they are still adequate for the highest 4k speeds.

Pacific Rim
The Matrix Trilogy
Aquaman.

False. They are pretty meh.
BR 2049 is an awful exapmple of HDR. It doesn't make enough stops. Borderline SDR. Avoid all Deakins/Villanueve shit.
4000nits baby. It's reference material. Though the matrix manages to exceed it still.

I legit hate modern TVs. I used to be you just update your cable connection (RCA to S-Video, component to HDMI), but now it's insane
>4k, 8k
>HDR, HDR+, Dolby Vision
>8 bit, 10 bit, 12 bit color
>60hz, 120hz
>4:4:4, 4:2:2, 4:2:0 subsampling rates
I'm literally sticking with basic 1080p until I die.

>It doesn't make enough stops. Borderline SDR. Avoid all Deakins/Villanueve shit.
I remember reading something about modern digital cameras still needing to catch up to the analog format and that involved stops. Is this one of the reasons so many digitally filmed movies repulse me? Something about the lighting looks off and stuff looks diffuse and poorly defined by lighting. I'm sure the softness introduced by excessive cgi doesn't help.

>before
>you got a garbage tv

>now
>you can get a garbage tv or a good tv

>wow this sucks let me go back to my 1080p dogshit IPS tv

Nice bait. You should also stick with a 1 speed bicycle. Modern vehicles are so crazy!

>Modern vehicles are so crazy!
Yeah, because I'm sure you are driving a stick shift Maserati that required a lot more skill than your Toyota Camry

?
You can still buy a brand new TV and just use 1080p, retard.

>stick shift
>skill
Everyone should know how to operate stick. I'm glad you're a big boy user.

>Everyone should know how to operate stick.
I'm sure you drive one everyday, not just know how to operate it. Of course you don't.

>Maserati
>a luxury vehicle ever being about skill

Oh you caught me user. I sure don't. Enjoy your stick

>Enjoy your stick
I don't drive a stick. Never claimed to.

This movie is gorgeous.

Attached: 74E21F97-18EB-42AD-BB35-7BA9F61D0EF6.jpg (1000x1481, 181.4K)

I prefer a flatter, kinoplex projected image, not TVs that burn my eyes with their nits. Only tech cucks and normies spend money on tv's

Ah yes, 500:1 contrast ratio, dim, blurry, only as good as the screen its cast on and as the room can be dark projector.

Projectors are junk and have been outclassed by TVs for a long, long time.

Nor did I claim you did. I was being sardonic since you seem to really have a thing for sticks. But this is really about 4k tvs. And you seem to have a stick up your ass about this crazy new tech. 1080p plasmas depending on the model and condition still display decent pictures. Tech keeps pushing forward and frankly, unless you really care about picture quality, you're fine sticking with HD.

>And you seem to have a stick up your ass about this crazy new tech.
Not really, there are just too many dumb settings.
>1080p plasmas depending on the model and condition still display decent pictures.
I can buy a 4k tv and still use 1080p only retard.
> Tech keeps pushing forward
It used to move forward without being so retarded.

I bet you use a soundbar or headphones, kid

HDR is nice, but how much of a difference does Dolby Vision make?

>gets told the truth about his shitty projector
>immediately goes to ad hominem bullshit because hes got nothing else to say

pixel perfect Yea Forums reply.

John Wick 2. Its showed off HDR the best of the majority of movies that I've seen. It was finished at 2k, but that isn't as big of a deal as you'd think.

Attached: staymad.png (525x350, 203.98K)

all HDR does is adjust brightness/contrast/saturation in response to what's on screen.

Were you the same when dvd moved to blu ray?

No. HDR is mastered with the notion of a peak brightness, specified with the TV having a high very high contrast ratio. Along with a wider gamut, set white points and 30bit colour. None of this happens "in resonance to whats on the screen".

HDR has nothing to do with colour saturation.

HDR and SDR work in exactly the same one, except HDR has a, you guessed it, higher dynamic range than SDR.