What do I read to achieve this?

How would you ensure that people know their place in the hierarchy and maintain order in a hierarchical society? You need the State to thwart and suppress social unrest in a class society, read Marx.

Fox news is for fascist boomers. Are you a retard?

> be lib right living in glorious ancapistan
> I get a notification on my phone
> pay 50 cents to applesoft to see the message
> mcamazoncorp has raised my rent 100% and revoked my healthcare
> at least it wasn't the government
> god I love freedom

don't do it user

Nice babies' first argument there.

Attached: 1582966472746.jpg (682x722, 137K)

You don't.

im talking about an ancap/libertarian society you absolute baby brain retard

No, you were talking about your strawman of an ancap/libertarian society, you nigger.

Inequality is enforced through the state. If I want to take something from someone, or kill someone, it is not the possesor of that thing, or my murder victim which stops me, but rather their rights granted by the state. It is the police, and the courts, which are the state themselves which punish me.

fpbp.
Mindless authoritarianism. Case in point To be fair, they're bootlickers

would you like to contest the idea that without intervention corporations tend to consolidate or that they will try to make profit wherever it is even remotely possible at the expense of the people?

bootlicker vs anarchism hmmm, i think they’re both bootlickers towards silly ideologies

To add to this: what does a world look like where the things in which a man possesses, or has power over, are only the things which he himself can enforce? There are no tyrants, slaves, empires, or authorities. This is equality in its most purse sense, this an intensely flat looking hierarchy. Even the most rudimentary forms of slavery and capital require a state; there is always a powerful body that substantiates slavery, as an institution, and enforces it with violence as far back as the first civilized men. And there can be no private property, without the state to do the same with land. There can be no business without an authority who gives currency to its money. Yes, without the state, there is no inequality or hierarchy - for the inequality and hierarchy themselves are the state.

The natural concentration of capital and power inherent to capitalism will inevitably lead to a sort of corporate feudalism.
It will not lead to freedom as you imagine it.

Then you misunderstand the terms completely.
The authoritarian's fanboy is a toady to power, an NPC zombi soldier. A bootlicker or ambitious conniving bootlicker.
Anarchism is about challenging all unjustifiable hierarchies like those. Many of the young actually hate all forms of authority, but they're usually from broken homes with no good role models. The goal is more freedom and personal responsibility. Ideologies themselves don't wear boots

Oh wow woman

Why is fascism considered "right" is it just for "as opposed to left"? ain't the whole point of fascism to be neither communism nor capitalism?

still retarded tho

It’s authoritarian capitalism. Weakened it becomes oligarchy.

The whole right vs left dichotomy is retarded bullshit pushed by people who think material conditions are the best or only way of measuring the health of a society, which ironically includes both Marxists and mainstream conservatives.

what hierarchies are justifiable and which are not?

Youre the same kind of dipshit who thought the repeal of net neutrality would mean 25 cents per snap chat. Learn some economics retard.

Natural hierarchies

>if it wasnt for the law Walmart would make my rent 1 million dollars. That's a brilliant buisness strategy.

Attached: 1582241346918.png (226x223, 7K)

aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/economic_power_vs_political_power.html

Communists use the term "capitalism" in the exact same way facists use the term "jew". Once you realize this it becomes obvious how pathetically retarded and cucked their ideology is.

the point is without any kind of regulation capital would continue to consolidate until most/all of industry was monopolized at which point there'd be no reason for business strategy because there'd be no competition

This is laughably false to anyone who has even a basic understanding of the history of economics. Look into the supposed monopolies of late 19th century America for example.

Even with total ownership of a commodity people will seek out alternatives and there is still the threat of potential competition. Only through military force can an economically hegemonic relationship be maintained.

I'm not talking about anything that's occurred in the history of economics. The type of consolidation of power that would be possible in a capitalist society without oversight is not something that we've ever seen before. But yes, these few corporations would likely have private armies to enforce their will

Everything is natural.

There are different types of capitalism as there are different and overlapping types of socialism.
Yer ”freemarkets” are one and very brief thought before it goes to monopoly then oligarchy

>Only fascists are antisemetic

This thread is pretty much why I hope corona-chan just kills humanity.

In the past there was no globalization, at least not to the current degree.

It's all worth it as long is it kills that which shall not be named.

>Hierarchy already inherent in nature

Unbased and body-with-organs pilled

You're just wishing for someone to take you out of your misery, the strong will survive.

The 'consolidation of power' would be infinitely lower than having any self proclaimed monopoly of force over large territories and enforcing your will. This is the same rehashed argument from the early 20th century according to which 'capitalism' would lead to a few dozens of monopolies by free contract, hence we must fight it by having one super giant monopoly resting on force.
Lolbergtarianism would lead to an extreme degree of decentralization (which you smear as 'feudalism').
>b-but it's different because muh power is using force instead of just the possibility of not dealing with you, plus they wear badges and stuff, and make declarations about working for the people
It is indeed different.

>unjustifiable hierarchies
Lmao. So YOU'RE the sovereign, eh?
Sorry, but if I had the choice to lick the boots of a middle-aged dyke anarchkiddie or a divine king, I'm going with the latter.

A lobotomy

Nothing.

Most great thinkers throughout history have occupied this position. Therefore the entire history of philosophy and the western canon.

All ideologies server the technological system.
Your ideology is trash.

Attached: compass.png (650x841, 118K)

discord trannies in the thread tonight
everybodys cringing at their replies
and we gon make them lose their minds
everybody just post duh duh duh
dilate

But that's ecofascism.

Get in. We're goin' for a ride, Jack! Where we're goin' we don't need no stinkin' books! It's time to put the pedal to the metal. Watch out, Corn Pop! Your malarkey ain't got nothin' on ol' Uncle Joe!

Damn, I'm hungry for ice cream...

Let's kick this bad boy into overdrive! Hope I don't run over any Bernie Sanders supporters. I just got this beauty cleaned at the shop.

Attached: 1583273191504.jpg (2040x1272, 772K)

There are sides which are more sympathetic. Radical traditionalism is certainly a return to pre-industrial society. Indeed race itself is created and upheld by nature. But we mustn't forget that 1930s Germany strongly believed in and pushed technological progress.

You literally don't read, in order to reach that you need to be a anti-intellectual thug, something like the Sturmabteilung or something

This is just sounds like anarchism with lesser steps.

Joseph de Maistre
Louis de Bonald
Juan Donoso Cortes
Nicolas Gomez Davila
Jean Ousset
Charles Maurras
Edouard Drumont
Julio Meinvielle
Henri Delassus
Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet
Plus classical literature (aka start with the Greeks), medieval literature and the big Catholic writers.

Is technology all bad though? What about techno-ruralism?

>Most great thinkers throughout history have occupied this position.
[citation needed]

Whats stopping the Walmart from hiring a private army to rule over you?

Reject reason, return to emotion

Back to plebbit with you retards. Friendly reminder that right wingers understand the position of left wingers much better than the opposite, all of you have no idea what you're talking about.