Is tradition just a spook?

Of course they could analytically interpret user, but they wouldn't understand. Maybe get a vague understanding but no real interest in these things prevents them from ever really understanding.

It's just not a place for women in virtue and in pleasure.

>why should we carry on tradition?
Because it's evolutionarily adaptive. Non-traditional people generally have sub-replacement fertility.

Attached: leftists don't breed.jpg (1280x2096, 761K)

>Proves my point

You don't know how to greentext. Typical woman "teehee I did it" effect is the only thing I receive.

You literally cannot refute this

If that were true then non-traditional people would've been completely bred out by now. History didn't begin a few generations ago.

>It's just not a place for women in virtue and in pleasure.
Because it's so immature?

Destroy the nuclear family

>why should we carry on tradition?
Sometimes tradition is stupid, sometimes it's not. For example, it is tradition to go to the Louvre and copy the masters if you're studying to be a painter. I think this is a good tradition. The ones who don't do this end up invariably producing Calarts shit.

Some traditions are worth preserving, some are not. It's not black and white. I despise this absolutist form of thinking where "x is a spook, therefore it should be wholly disregarded."

Think of non-traditional people as a mutation. This mutation is descended from traditional families. However, the 'mutant' doesn't always pass on its genes; infact, this is the case many times.

Tradition one of the strongest ways for humans to partake in shared relations or commonalities, which is psychologically satisfying. Its a convenient trait that incentivises cooperative behavior to become widespread.

“The fact that most of our sources of knowledge are traditional condemns [the] anti-traditionalist as futile. But this fact must not be held to support a traditionalist attitude: every bit of our traditional knowledge (and even our inborn knowledge) is open to critical examination and may be overthrown. Nevertheless, without tradition, knowledge would be impossible."

- Karl Popper

>Is there any concrete logical basis for carrying on customs / culture / language etc??
Sure, for a start the vast majority of people aren’t philosopher LARPing faggots who need a philosophical framework to go on with their day to day lives, and to go further, some of these, -shall we call them non-fags- enjoy specific traditions, such as a cozy Christmas tree, or not pissing yourself in the Agora to virtue-signal fuck knows what.
What about the traditions they don’t like, you might ask. Well, it’s a complicated issue really, but to summarize, they don’t take part in those specific traditions, and sometimes they go on Facebook to bitch about them.

Possibly millions of years of social evolution, la.. It's different to someone just making up shit. It's truths passively wrung out of thousands of generations.

do you think with time and in an age where rapid transport and communications is the norm, the dominant tradition, culture, language develops local strands, flavours of itself as other people start following it more? Or do all traditions, cultures and languages converge to a an average of the good parts of all? (as their genetics also turn into a mixture)
can tradition even be maintained in a technological age?

>Why keep tradition?
Said the frogposter

exactly

Some traditions are useful, even when people don't know why they exist.
Think of the tradition against premarital sex. And how people abandoned it because they didn't know why it existed in the first place. And the results of abandoning it.