>she doesn't write footnotes
She doesn't write footnotes
She deserves to have a table thrown at her and being psychologically harassed.
"YES"
KYS footfag
DFW doesn't write footnotes either, all of his notes are endnotes and that's what makes them a fucking pain in the ass. Sure, sure, buddy, they're there "because of a formal reason involving the back and forth of flipping through the pages". My fucking ass, you idiot.
not in "a supposedly fun things ill never do again"
>people are STILL referencing the stupid thread I made when I was 16
>user is STILL bragging ownership of a shitpost he made when he was 16
Endnotes are superior to footnotes.
I don't read footnotes, prologues, introductions or whatever, i don't have time for this shit
>prologues
Based, aside from this. Prologues are usually the most enjoyable parts.
the patricians choice
Fuck you, it’s always cumbersome and clunky.
I got tired of DFW's footnotes shtick by the end of Brief Interviews and will never want to read any book with it again.
>She
Yea no fuck this.
It’s all I have going for me desu, life turned out to be pretty shit
How can we make authorettes more comfortable with footnotes?
Why do you keep bumping this shitty thread? Just let it die already
Footnotes make a text hypertextual though which will help us usher in the singularity
Authorettes only show you their footnotes if they're supes comfortable with you unless you're like an editor or something
>Mary Karr's footnotes fall into your lap
What's an ethical author to do?
I'd thumb through Mary Karr's footnotes without even a moment's hesitation.
i'm a hot guy, and i'd never date a girl who doesn't write footnotes.
Can't be with a HIV+ transsexual chineselatino femme girl that doesn't do copious annotation
>EZoncarrots @Grindr
Coom at me brah
>David, can you help me with my footnotes?
>Oh, my husband doesn't mind
I think before IJ his work had footnotes.
>tfw no mommy domme
Supplementary dissertations and hypertechnical appendices are where it's at.