Who has the more convincing argument?
Who has the more convincing argument?
Nicholas Campbell
Thomas King
Schopenhauer is still fundamentally rooted in New Testament ascetism which is life-denying whereas Nietzsche removes the shackles of Christianity and affirms the will as categorically good and to be pursued.
Chase Brown
Schopenhauer's got those soulless eyes in that picture jesus. In response to your question you only need to ask yourself one thing. Of the two men, which was such a chad that he kicked a lady down a flight of stairs for interrupting his writing? I think you'll find your answer within that answer.
Sebastian Reed
neetzsche is just a slave to the demiurge like so many others, admitting it doesn't make him any better
Jordan Scott
...for if madness won't leave us in peace
even here in Nuremberg,
then let it be in the service of such works
as are seldom successful in plain activities
and never so without a touch of madness.
Luis Morgan
Different men with different lives. Both noble spirits. Others have exceeded both.
Owen Diaz
>Others have exceeded both.
Who?
Nietzsche was a beta lunatic larping as a noble warrior. His critique is really good and keen but Schopenhauer was more practical.
Zachary Edwards
>who?
I'm not necessarily restricting this conversation to philosophers
Zachary Morris
Kant
Nicholas Smith
Both aren't too important as real philosophers, but Nietzsche at least had a lot of impact on aesthetics, poetics and critical analysis.