Hey Yea Forums, do you think that fascism is the closest we have ever gotten to putting Nietzsche's ideas into practice?

Hey Yea Forums, do you think that fascism is the closest we have ever gotten to putting Nietzsche's ideas into practice?
I know that there are those who argue that Nietzsche was a leftist, but that always seemed like bullshit to me.

Attached: nietzsche.jpg (1200x1628, 514K)

What is fascism? It sounds to me like a word communist people throw around like it's an insult.

Nietzsche is right-wing, sure, but in short Fascism is far too populist. For N., the masses are there only to be exploited for the Higher Men -- Fascism is built on the masses. Some kind of aristocracy is more accurate.

i'm a total brainlet but i always felt like the association of fascism with nietzsche was overstated. wouldn't like a form of right-wing anarchism be more fitting?

Yes. Specifically American fascism.

>For N., the masses are there only to be exploited
Sounds pretty leftist.

Fascism is really more Carlylian than Nietzschean.

Attached: Carlyle.jpg (700x360, 32K)

Nah, he definitely believed in some form of political hierarchy.

kek

Indian Caste System seems a lot like what Nietzsche wanted.

nietzsche is a fascist if he gets to be the dictator
he would have nothing but contempt for the followers of a dictator

based

This is the only resonable take on the matter. Anyone who thinks he was a fascist or even worse a liberal, a democrat or a leftist by any means is delulded and/or has not read Nietzsche.

Not true. He didn't have contempt for the followers of Napoleon or Caesar. He had contempt for those who had resentment for those kind of men and wanted to level society.

Fascism is not populistic because it appeals to a higher ideal and not to complacency.
The fascist mass always glorifies things like physical fitness and technological progress and thus aims to improve itself instead of circlejerking like other movements.

>Fascism is not populistic because it appeals to a higher ideal

Founded upon the Geist of the populace, no?

He says in The Antichrist that it's the duty of "the few," i.e. the intellectual elite / first rank natural-born leaders to treat mediocrity with gentleness. It's not about contempt for the herd, it's about contempt for socialists and anarchists who subvert the herd into becoming resentful towards the elite.

Attached: introspective_men.jpg (900x360, 224K)

His spirit is carried with any individualist-anarchist movement, but anyone who says he was a clearly capitalist/Marxist is projecting.

Slight tangent: Is it possible to be a fascist without also being a reactionary?

>the closest we have ever gotten to putting Nietzsche's ideas into practice?
>>the closest we
>>>we
>>>>we
read Nietzsche

"Every enhancement of the type "man" has so far been the work of an aristocratic society - and it will be so again and again - a society that believes in the long ladder of an order of rank and differences in value between man and man"

- Beyond Good and Evil 257 - Kaufmann

Doesn't sound overstated to me

>technocratic oligarchy
No. Read Carl Schmidt.

because of neet I'm trans. I know my destiny. I'm gonna take the privilege of being a transgender lesbian poc and I'm gonna get publish and I'm also gonna get pussy.
See you later slave faggots.

is transhumanism ubermensch or last man