Did Guenon retroactively refute this?

Did Guenon retroactively refute this?

Attached: serveimage (13).jpg (289x445, 11K)

Who?

"Better to have never been" logically entails "better to have never written this garbage book" thus the book performs a self-retroactive-refutation through its title alone.

this shit was always gay
antinatalists should kill themselves tho and the rid the world of their genetic waste

Yes. Why some people are so miserable that it isn't enough to be miserable on their own, but that they make it their mission to make you miserable too, is beyond me. Like nigguh just drink bleach or something

not an argument

You're saying the book, the communicative aspect of the idea, is refuting the idea that is not the book

t. haven't reached the real of supra-rationality

Then it's an idea that cannot be communicated without contradiction, but that only appears to be happening because of a flaw in your own logical reasoning

What's the anti-natalist argument? Unironically 'I didn't choose to be born therefore noone should be born because that is a violation of free will'?