ITT books that advocate the active dismantlement of society

ITT books that advocate the active dismantlement of society

Attached: antitech.jpg (333x499, 16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crisso-and-odoteo-barbarians-the-disordered-insurgence
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Attached: 436351._UY432_SS432___01.jpg (284x432, 52K)

Attached: B98E5580-94CD-480F-8A81-EFC6673A2A39.jpg (334x499, 32K)

/thread
nothing comes close. rest of them are idealist drivels

You’re under-socialized

TCI comes pretty close.

Attached: download (3).jpg (290x174, 5K)

Keep them comming

The Empire has counted the hours. Hardt and Negri nurture no doubts on this point, cherishing the certainty that “A new nomad horde, a new race of barbarians will arise to invade or evacuate Empire.” (p.213). Once the joyful tidings are announced, the only thing left then is to again propose the question already raised by Nietzsche — where are the barbarians? A basic question, but one to which it is impossible to give an answer if one does not first confront another question — who are the barbarians?

At his point it becomes necessary to deepen the concept of barbarian, the definition of which contains more than one meaning. Etymologically this term indicates the foreigner who came from another country and who was unable to make him/herself understood and expressed him/herself falteringly because s/he did not know the language of the polis. Historically it points to an individual who is characterized by blind, devastating violence, by savage roughness. The barbarian is the one who does not speak the language of the city-State and also the one who breaks loose with fury. On first view, it is not easy to understand how this dual interpretation that appears illogical could exist united in one word. Why ever should one who doesn’t speak our language be a brutal savage? Why ever would one who resorts to the most ferocious violence not be able to express him/herself through the same words we use?

In reality, there is a profound link between the lack of a common language and inexplicable violent behavior. Within a society, a common language allows the sides to know each other, to reconcile differences, to find an arrangement. In the case of a conflict, it allows the adversaries to distinguish between friends and enemies, limiting the use of force. Without this possibility of understanding, there is no place for mediation, but only for uncontrolled violence. Opposed forces can descend to pacts only if they are able to communicate with each other. In the situation in which they fight, the possibility for dialogue still places a limit on their violence. It establishes a threshold beyond which not to go so that future negotiations will not be nullified. But without this common language, without the concrete possibility of knowing any thing about the other — the basic premise for discovering the thing that can harmonize the interests of the antagonists — nothing remains but to fight to the last drop of blood.

theanarchistlibrary.org/library/crisso-and-odoteo-barbarians-the-disordered-insurgence

Attached: barbarians.jpg (208x320, 21K)

Imagine wanting to destroy thousands of years of physical, mental, and spiritual exertion towards improving mankind's lot in this world in order to live like African savages in mud-huts. Embarrassing! Kaczynski should've spent his money on a flight to Africa instead of moving into the forest. He would've gotten along well the IQ 65 inhabitants of subsaharan Africa.

Attached: 1552522376837.png (182x277, 3K)