Julius Evola

Is 'riding the tiger' the ultimate redpill?

Attached: 1567320942610.gif (1134x820, 2.31M)

Throwing out reactionary trash and reading actual theory is the ultimate redpill.

Caesarism will eventually come back, whether you like it or not. Daily reminder.

Attached: 332434342342.jpg (1352x2058, 1.9M)

cyclical history is retarded

It actually makes a lot of sense.

if you are simple minded

If you observe history.

>Reading actual """"""theory""""""

don't forget that theory, the theory that you're speaking of, is a relatively recent and highly subversive phenomenon founded almost entirely by marxists and jews. stop pretending its prestigious or more legitimate than any other form of sociology or philosophy. it's not.

Linear history is dumber though.

Why can't you retards finally admit that history doesn't make sense and that we simply don't know where the fuck we're going.

But at least it’s not retarded new age mumbo-jumbo like Evola. As bad as theory can be sometimes, Evola is just a notch removed from juvenile Lord of the Rings LARPing like Varg’s garbage or bullshit like Aleister Crowley or Blavatsky without Crowley’s sense of humour or Blavatsky’s spastic weirdness.

I didnt say anything about linear history
which you have read none of

Funny you should say that, seeing as I've read adorno, Deleuze, and Foucault, and you haven't read Evola.

>dude lmfao we can just keep growing forever fuck yeah capitalism
I never get why people who aren't gazillionaires are Liberals. Perhaps a leather fetish drives them to lick boots?

I literally said nothing about that

please see the gif in the OP, faggots. honkler jumps around riding the tiger. cheers to whoever made it.

This.

Most liberals are just afraid that going far right or left is going to lead to a disaster and bloodshed. It's a basically centrist position, and the 20th century does give them a bit of an argument.

It's a naive view because liberal states don't just stay how they are, they move in a predictable direction that eventually undermines the system they liked in the first place, but this could be said of practically any form of government/economy.

You literally did, though, when you stated that you're implicitly a liberal.

Why are you so afraid of even the notion of not being part of the herd? Does the yoke around your neck weigh so much that you cannot even consider to raise it up and look around you?

unless you're some outlaw bank robber or a warlord you're still part of a herd

wow so deep bro

Same level as depth as saying belonging to society is being a herd.

>saying reactionary like it's a bad thing

What's the relationship between Evola and Spengler?

Yes and no.

care to elaborate?

Oh, how I despise you.

Attached: 1543534471139.png (1000x1000, 1.94M)

Not him but he has a point and so do you. Evola is shit tier even if he is heading in turn right direction. He is a midwit, or at best an idiot savant. Inferior in all ways to Guenon which is not only more intelligent but much more lucid. Evola has the physiognomy of a car mechanic. Guenon looks like a genius.

"Riding the tiger" is a really vague imperative that doesn't elaborate a clear path of action. It's only a redpill if it bears meaning; in other words, while it points out what is to be ridden (the tiger), it doesn't teach you how to ride. Learning how to ride is the only-just-implied redpill in this imperative. But I dare say that many who think they're riding the tiger are already in its claws; or else they may even be the tiger's claws themselves.

Attached: Martinique_Landscape_Paul_Gauguin,_1887.jpg (1219x1600, 549K)

What was Guéno's solution? Converting to Islam?

Reading Man And His Technics should be a requirement for posting in Spengler threads.

The ultimate redpill is to see modernity as something that has to be surpassed, but which was necessary for taking the next step towards a new restoration of the traditional values. Finally denying both Modernity and the Ancient Regime.

Attached: jean-delville-parsifal-1890.jpg (1000x1245, 503K)

No.
Guenon thought traditional Catholicism was the best religion for Europe

Do as I say not as I do, I suppose?

Why did he LARP as a Muslim then?

willful ignorance is also retarded

Attached: beach.jpg (373x407, 13K)

Guénon and Evola shit all over Catholicism. I don't think either of them liked it. This is one of the reasons I don't take them too seriously. They seem to love all religions, EXCEPT Catholicism. This is more true for Evola than Guénon. Guénon seemed to like Catholicism but thought it was lacking an initiatory side. That's why he converted to Islam supposedly , in order to find an unbroken initiatory chain. I think his choice was lamentable. Imagine leaving the one true religion in order to larp as an "initiated one" among copper-toned Egyptians. Sad!

Attached: Paul_Gauguin_105.jpg (3176x2796, 932K)

Massive cringe alert
Scurry back to your trash board

I was moreso hating on him for his passive nods to Blavatsky and Crowley, who I hate. Evola is not on their depth of shitty nonsense, he at least writes well and does not claim to have met demonic apparitions.
I am also not /pol/ incarnate, I am an Evola fan but also a Deleuze/Guattari fan.

Attached: 1547272147354.jpg (600x378, 110K)