Banning Degenerate Books

Let's start with the obvious books that introduce fetishes and kinks, promiscuity and sex without any morals behind it. Let's start at the 20th + 21st century liberal sexual revolution and begin to ban those books. Let's ban books that glorify drugs, characters shouldn't be snorting cocaine- and if they are, they should die immediately. That is banning degeneracy, then we can get into nuance.

Nobody reads books anymore anyway, grandpa. They learn things from their friends or the internet.

I'm having a hard time where you're coming from with this, let's get some things straight.

1. Art has been co-opted by University types, these are ultra-liberal, free bleeding types that are extremely promiscuous.

2.This has been bleeding through to our literature for the last 50-60 years where things like gay marriage, promiscuity, drugs and fetishes are glorified in books like "Lolita" that should be banned.

3.So you're agreeing with me that American art is ruining the world and should be banned? Thanks.

Slippery slope. The concept of degeneracy stops functioning as a clinical designation, (aberrant behavior at odds with natural laws) but instead becomes whatever those in power assign it as.

Even books that glorify extreme social taboos, pedophilia , and the like, despite their repulsive character, serve to bolster the far side of possibilities. Firmly stamping out such a vile coordinate limits the whole space. Perhaps next all knowledge of the topic will be stamped out, counterintuitively allowing the banned subject to grow while society remains in ignorance.

The Nazis and Soviets for instance shut down several research institutes and banned or destroyed literature that conflicted with their ideology. The result was a closed, intellectually stunted literature which could only replicate the party line to remain safe.

Okay, so let's say they read books. You would agree with me that liberal, degenerate books should then be banned under this context?

Nope. And even if you did, all of those things (whatever it is you're talking about) are available online. Especially on this website.

based
yikes&cringe

>The concept of degeneracy stops functioning as a clinical designation, (aberrant behavior at odds with natural laws) but instead becomes whatever those in power assign it as.
I'm not interested in what comes out of the psychology department, if it quacks like a duck then it is a duck, and we should listen to our collective instinct instead of academia. Psychology/Sociology has been co-opted by Marxists, and it's not surprising you're trying to justify liberal degenerate literature using academic talk.

>The Nazis and Soviets for instance shut down several research institutes and banned or destroyed literature that conflicted with their ideology. The result was a closed, intellectually stunted literature which could only replicate the party line to remain safe.
I'm not sure what you mean with this, the Nazi's and the USSR did bad things, but that doesn't mean EVERYTHING they did was bad. The Nazi's were strong on animal rights for example. They got some things right, such as banning liberal degeneracy (on part of Nazi Germany).

kill yourself faggot

>such as banning liberal degeneracy (on part of Nazi Germany).

Attached: image-1361800-860_poster_16x9-pihq-1361800.jpg (860x484, 79K)

>glorified in books like "Lolita"

I wish I could chalk this up to trolling, but Americans are genuinely this retarded.

best book

Attached: 51O9dI0WjXL._SX338_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (340x499, 30K)

As a society, Nazi Germany most definitely removed the Wiemar Republic's rampant degeneracy (The Wiemar Republic is what we're heading into because of liberal literature). I am sure on individual cases, sometimes though a rarity, degeneracy did happen, but for the most societal part (the most you can do) it WAS wiped out.

dilate

Attached: pl3khlkq28k01.png (862x532, 609K)

> collective instinct instead of academia.
What happens when not everybody has the same collective instincts? Then they aren't instincts. A government by instinct is a government oran by monkeys.
> but that doesn't mean EVERYTHING they did was bad.
This is an evasion. My larger point was quite clear. By dictating the range of topics anyone can write about, you're stunting and damaging whole possibilities for thought and discussion. Eventually this process repeats until everything besides the one faith suffocates and only the party line persists. Eventually everything sucks and we're stuck with the one shitty ideology.

The same can be said for Islamic theocracies or any kind censorship regime .

Stop replying to bait

>> collective instinct instead of academia.
What happens when not everybody has the same collective instincts? Then they aren't instincts. A government by instinct is a government oran by monkeys.
You've hit on a good point, and it IS because of the degenerate erosion of our literature (as all other forms of art) that our collective morality has shifted and has put us in this divided place. Once the degeneracy is banned from appearing in literature, then our instincts will collectively sink back in.

>This is an evasion. My larger point was quite clear. By dictating the range of topics anyone can write about, you're stunting and damaging whole possibilities for thought and discussion. Eventually this process repeats until everything besides the one faith suffocates and only the party line persists. Eventually everything sucks and we're stuck with the one shitty ideology.
Progression is progression, we will be under a one-culture, non-degenerate system and under that direction, we will progress. Look at Nazi Germany, and the culture they had- it was not hampered by removing the Wiemar Republic. Similarly, if we ban books that promote, and offer inclusivity to fetishes, kinks, drugs, gay... have you.. then we will similarly, simply leave that part behind us.

>The same can be said for Islamic theocracies or any kind censorship regime.
What you can say Islamic Theocracies are, is a block of thinking, instead of being separated. as we are now.

Not really, A-LOT of other people share my same view, go to /pol/ some time.
.

The real SIE would have never said Newsflash. End this charade already, user.

>my views are losing in the marketplace of ideas and this is a bad thing

>fetishes & kings

Attached: EBiZOLOUIA0Hpej.jpg (585x1024, 110K)

Yes, especially (((Americans))). Their Flesh Golems are merely a symptom. Nothing fire can't clean.

Fuck the monarchy.

Based and kigupilled.

Attached: main_image_2.jpg (1200x1200, 413K)

I just want to fuck a kigu at least once before I die
I just can't stop thinking about it

Attached: D2f-Q8FUgAEEhP5.jpg (1364x2048, 227K)

Yeah me too. There's a weirdo out there for everyone. Best wishes finding yours.

>guys, we can stop this activity that predates writing if we just stop people from reading about it

Attached: 1486752513923 (2).jpg (125x121, 1K)

>I want to fuck a man in an anime costume
Congratulations, you're a faggot

>you're a faggot
I know

Attached: the-happiest-smiling-cat-in-the-world-23392641.png (500x610, 152K)

Yes, and?

Attached: D6wAzKoUIAQHKkY.jpg (900x1200, 161K)

the costume is optional

Attached: D2_W4yJVAAAapVL.jpg (675x1200, 186K)

>Should we begin to ban degenerate books
Let’s do it. Luckily, there isn’t a way to transmit text electronically or banning books would have a limited impact on controlling the flow of information.

Don't worry we'll just shut down the internet and kill anyone who tries to communicate illegal information. Welcome to Islamic Communism.

>Welcome to Islamic Communism.
Yo, if there is anyone who needs to crack open a book, it is you.

baka
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_socialism

Is this the same person?

Attached: tongue piercing.jpg (576x1024, 128K)

Wow, that actually sounds pretty cool.

you will never have sex.

Yep
mobile.twitter.com/shano0123

phoneposter begone

Amazing! You're the best, thank you, user.

Rightcucks lol

BURN ALL THE BOOKS
yeaaaaaah
I like burning books.

Fuck off back to your containment board polcuck

butt hurt fly
lol

Attached: 8fe13df64b805279332112d1ac4e978c399eb808751746934ce7165e4d7f2dbe.jpg (1280x720, 179K)

Crying about "degeneracy" and calls for repression are the last gasp of a dying culture or a dying nation, just let it go, you can't conserve anything, and why would you want to? The core of all beauty lies in how it's ephemeral

you have to go back

Shut the fuck up and kill yourself retard waste of air

You can't fight degeneracy and decadence. It's going to happen whether you like it or not. You can never go back to the old ways. You have to push through it. It won't last forever, but we have to reach a breaking point before the death of God is fully realized, and the new man emerges.

Attached: 730nietzsche-friedrich_400x400.jpg (400x400, 34K)

It's kind of fascinating watching it happen. The next step is full-blown antisemitism.

Attached: 1569023662487.jpg (1261x776, 257K)

Gonna have to disagree with that image desu, milfs and gilfs are great

Funny, without degeneracy the West wouldn't exist at all. There is no reason married sex is so attractive if premarital sex isn't. Hence no reason to get married at all. And because of the common custom of excusing premarital sex that resulted in pregnancy by blessing it with a wedding, especially before easily available contraceptives, this has ensured everyone is descended from degenerates in western society.

Those that passed on their genes most were those that ignored the rules most. You can't escape the red pill so easily.

So glad I'm a lesbian and don't have to deal with the horrific heterosexual paradigm.
Also she looks pretty cute in both pics. Would have threesome with her older and younger self.

Calm down, fascist.

Based and pussyeatingpilled

Enjoy your cope

Attached: early 30s.jpg (800x568, 105K)

Not a cope lol, I was born like this.
Also those pics are so obviously taken at different lens diameters, picrelated

Attached: 97d6cb27f73a449d93865a8f3837c12c.jpg (560x416, 75K)

you're on the most degenerate site on the internet, and are complaining about degeneracy.

you are the problem, you're unable to see yourself in a mirror

Photos such as these are proof positive incels are broken. You seek out someone for companionship and love, not solely attraction. These photos are hardly any dramatic change. Calm down with your ridiculous standards

Attached: cave.gif (250x167, 855K)

>Please continue to love me even though I look like an old catcher's mitt and I spent years not developing a personality because I didn't anticipate this would ever happen to me!

No dice, grandma. You're stuck this way now.

Attached: 1568912035861.jpg (992x558, 61K)

Very few people even read books nowadays.
That said, I'm not sure that banning shows/movies which promote bad morals is a bad idea. The world would be a better place without the likes of Sex and the City.

But given how the powers-that-be are, it is much more likely that they ban books promoting good morals than books promoting promiscuity, drugs, etc.

And you have the balls to call women shallow

>he looks into the mirror every night
>face strained with years of posting and blue light has whithered his once youthful complexion
>he attempts to cry and muster some sort of emotion
>but all he can say is a pitiful weep of "...its the jews...."

Attached: 1568517637134.gif (286x210, 745K)

I am not shallow. I have told women for years to develop a personality and a soul instead of relying on the default template personality "woman in prime of youth," which results in infinite free attention even if you're 4-5/10, because that template is only viable for 4-8 years and then depreciates faster than a new car.

I am criticizing women who identify as their physical husk, not the rare handful of women who are real people (AKA honorary men).

Attached: 1564694897219.jpg (800x953, 183K)

I know right?! [my new favorite reaction image]

You don’t know what love is.

Attached: B4D0BE95-FD67-4A33-913E-CBFFBB1AF31E.png (500x375, 276K)

Naomi Watts is like 50 and she is still pretty hot

Attached: twin peaks naomi watts.gif (498x278, 2.65M)

Absolutely, Furthermore Carthago Delenda Est.

idk on this one chief

No books should ever be banned. Also Thomas frank rules

Yes let’s start by banning everything that isn’t tailored to your value system. You alone should control everything that is disseminated to the public. Shut the fuck up

You’ve got to be trolling

Banning books is censorship, no.

Burning them publicly though is fine.

Why shouldn't culture erode?