And? How many books of female writers are on your shelf?

Just one

Attached: 73122E87-F203-48A5-B914-CB03A9ED2549.jpg (344x499, 36K)

I own works by Frances Yates, Jane Harrington and Rebecca French. No fiction by women, though.

Attached: goldenyoke.jpg (332x499, 37K)

>ayn rand

usually shuts them up.

lol

>taking women seriously

Attached: coloringbook.jpg (1200x1198, 458K)

3. Woolf, Cecília Meireles and Saint Agnes.

35 female authors of my 364 marked 'read' on goodreads

so like 9%? kek

>that image

Attached: 19563535.jpg (696x900, 65K)

>Mrs. Dalloway
Cool to see a woman writing about stuff like PSTD and using Joyce's SoC technique, but I don't see myself re-reading this book any soon.

>Jane Eyre
Love it.

>Possession (Byatt)
Boring, had to brute-force my way through the end.

O'Connor

>9%
>not 0%

Attached: faggotidentified.gif (500x333, 150K)

I'm not a MGTOW faggot who's going to turn a good book away because it was written by a woman. Elaine Pagels, Simone Weil, and Hannah Arendt are great thinkers. Virginia Woolf was a great novelist. I just read what's good and canon and don't go out of my way to read X number of women.

this is the only book i have bought written by a woman in recent memory

however, the fact that the author is a woman has no bearing on the work itself. purchased purely on her merit as a historical writer

Attached: The-Thirty-Years-War_1024x1024.jpg (639x1023, 265K)

Why is she critical of people who dont read anything recent? I can see the logic of a woman wanting people to read women but who cares about when it was written?

what does a man's cum taste like?

Because then it is more likely that you are incluenced by modern SJW writers

>ywn get to lynch heretics
why even live?

I have Middlemarch, Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, and Mythology

Do women really get turned off when you tell them you mostly read old books?
Women are stupid

I doubt she understood a word of that

To be honest, I'm not sure I'm not the same.
Don't get memed by women. The only things that turns them off are physical characteristics that imply low testosterone. Chad could be reading nothing but Virgil and Plato and they would fawn over him for being educated and cultured.

women don't give a shit what you read. they might get turned off if you act like an autist about literature

When Chad is autistic, it's quirky and cute, when pic related is autistic, it's creepy and weird.

Attached: incel.jpg (354x439, 33K)

>I’m not sure I’m not the same
Yes but did you write a bunch of nonsense all over the page and then post a picture of it to make you look smart?

>pic related
>who is Gillian Anderson

Attached: gillianandersonpussy.jpg (2750x1695, 681K)

Whenever I'm asked this I just list out history and theology books I'm reading and the girl looks like a fish out of water. I can tell they've taken a few literature classes and think themselves as experts because they've gotten through the meme lists, so when they believe they have the upper hand in that domain I'll casually drop in knowledge on the books they're reading so they know I've been through them and deem it as secondary importance. I'm petty but it's fun
You chose the wrong one
Only if you're ugly and you date woman with an inferiority complex(99% that read)

Attached: 51Dwz21ooHL._SX340_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (342x499, 40K)

ok sure, but for most people in between not being autistic matters

What are the best history books in your opinion, user? So many of them are pozzed nowadays.

yes thats the whole point

Art is DIVERSE now : get with the program.

I would personally just name a bunch of obscure, if not made up female writers.

wtf!? where is her dick!?

Five books, three authors. Jane Austen, Flannery O'Connor, Edith Wharton.

Unlike our resident abomination, Gillian is a natural born woman

Avoid general history, no "the story of humans since Sumar" type shit or anything trying to front a thesis that pertains to contemporary issues. NOTHING WRITTEN BY JOURNALIST. The mindset of one is the absolute worst when it comes to historical study, also avoid cringe autistic "categorizations of civilizations" trash like Spengler. Find your interests and from there try to get as specific as possible. You're an accountant who likes Persian miniatures? Economy of the safavids. Read ontology and want to visit Machu Picchu? Metaphysics of Incan religion. Enjoy settings of carnage, misery, and chaos among advanced urban populations with early firearms? Thirty years war. Pre med from a southern European City? Italian medieval medical practices. Give me an interest and I'll suggest some books. I specialize in early modern me and Mediterranean history but I'll do the best I can

I would like to brush up on my general eastern history. India, China, and Japan are my main interests in that regard, especially the first two.

are you the guy who recommended me a history of greece by jb bury last night?

Based Coomer

Her doing that would save me the time it takes to figure out she's a shallow pseudointellect.

Dubs of Didacticism

Attached: Pinochet ETs.png (500x500, 404K)

I mean yeah that's cringe but desu hegel is hard to decipher

In my apartment? I believe only one, and I only picked up Wuthering Heights because I figured I'd read it some day.

Pagels is good, also Yates. I like Paglia although I do not always agree with her.

I know some good ones, but it'll be better if you were more specific.. pre or post Muslim India? Chinese dynasty? I only know good books on meiji era Japan
No not me, I'm actually completely burnt out with classical Greece and imperial Rome. Too much reading as a teen and the aesthetics are overdone

Attached: Фаррух_Бек_Бабур_принимает_придворных._Бабурнаме._1589._Г (1921x3000, 2.14M)