What books will help me understand and ultimately defeat the ideology of Cultural Marxism...

leftists hate us because they ain't us. they wish they could be as genuinely capital R Revolutionary, transgressive, anti-establishment and rebellious as the Fascist Movement.

based

gays and trannies are the ultimate holy cows, what could be more rebellious and edgy than to vocally oppose them? It's the modern equivalent of blaspheming against the holy spirit or insulting the monarchy.

heres a video of "midwit" peterson
youtu.be/naWWzn2fxWc
tl;dr:peterson says that cultural marxism is the result of the death of God and by extension objective morality.
Maybe we should go back to Nietzche and see how he arrived to the conclusion that God is dead in the first place.

Cultural Marxism isn't a thing, no leftist would call themselves or anything about what they do cultural Marxist. It is a right wing term used to describe capitalist social concessions to the working class.
The Frankfurt school is often misinterpreted and often goes unstudied by people making claims against them. They argue that the commodification of culture and identity will ultimately lead to a culture based purely on transaction value, the capitalists will sell you your culture. Is homosexuality becoming more accepted? The accept them as long as you make tons of money off them by pandering, hence the picture in . Basically, "cultural marxism" is a scapegoat used by right wingers to somehow say that the Frankfurt school is arguing "DUDE FREE SEX AND SHIT LMAO". When in reality, the Frankfurt school wants to decommodify culture. For leftists this means do not trust corporations as they will side with right wingers and fund right ring death squads if it makes them more money than pandering to gays.

tldr Read Theodor Adorno

Attached: bourg.jpg (273x444, 23K)

The Controversy of Zion

>Cultural Marxism isn't a thing

Attached: 1543118977913.jpg (325x499, 27K)

You are thinking of "capitalism", user. Marxism has been dead for 3 decades.

there are some nice articles in the arktos journal
arktos.com/2019/08/27/freudo-marxian-deconstruction-part-1/

>Cultural Marxism isn't a thing
It's used to refer to application of Marxist framework in the field of cultural studies. E.g. some of the works of György Lukács like The Theory of the Novel; The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction by Walter Benjamin or the Kulturindustrie from Theodor Adorno.

>Fascism is a youthful rebellion
Fascism with its "might makes right" thuggery is the 80+ y/o old bullshit that got a well-deserved ass kicking when the morons who invented it tried to put it into action. Shows how brainless you people are that you can't come up with anything even remotely new and relevant to deal with the various issues facing us here in the 21st century, no, you have to go to the graveyard and dig up archaic garbage from when your grandfather was a kid. Pathetic.

Attached: Berlin 1945.jpg (1280x1300, 405K)

>"might makes right" thuggery
>got a well-deserved ass kicking

always hilarious when the leftist masks sloughs off and reveals the aging vampire underneath

>death instinct
Freudian concept. Are you a Freudian?
>slave morality
Nietzschean concept. Do you realize to what extent Nietzsche contributed to the sort of developments in philosophy you would probably consider “degenerate”
>create an homogenous herd of consumers
I’m quite certain that the “cultural Marxist” authors are against that
>technocratic
Are you against technology?
>Fascism
oh lmao why am I wasting my time

>you can't use a concept unless you literally agree with everything that its inventor thought

First of all the way in which you phrased your question shows, that you lack even a base overview of philosophy and ideology or you are shitposting.
Just read Deleuze, then the commentary of platons parmenides by proclus, realize that the neuplatonic one is equal to the undifferentiated. Then read proclus elements of theology from that post-structuralist position and realize that as the negation of modernity you can overcome it by the rereading of traditional texts which were only let down by modernisms critiques. And to "defeat" an idea is childish. Realize your oponents concerns or root of concerns and search for a better solution to capitalism than communism if you dont like it

Attached: doggoswimming.webm (640x640, 1.29M)

Start with the Hebrews

First thing to beat out of your head is that it's marxist philosophers or postmodern philosophers pushing what you're talking about. What you're talking about is real but cultural marxism is a retarded term for it. It's too complicated of a phenomena with too many causes simplify like that.
Nietzsche is the really the primary person to really diagnose the phenomenon, but of course that was long before it became what it is today. I think the Genealogy of Morals which you seem to have read is crucial to getting it.
But I'd also read certain Marxists who see what is happening for a good materialist perspective of what is going on. The materialist perspective actually cuts through a lot of moral bullshit, like the genealogical perspective. Whether you buy the labor theory of value or Marxist economics makes more or less no difference to see the truth in Marxists cultural theorists like Adorno or Jameson (or more pop figures like Mark Fisher if that's also your thing).
Lasch and Baudrillard would also be good reading for understanding the idpol/PC/fill in the blanks, you know what I'm talking about phenomena. Lasch for the psychology of it, Baudrillard for the superficiality of thinking that it requires.

what book of Baudrillard ?

retard. stop posting

Gulag Archipelago

Cultural Marxism is a ploy not of the leftists, but of companies such as Netflix, Facebook and stuff to further their income.

Based

B-but the youtuber said..

Yeah, the best way to defeat might makes right idiocy is precisely to kick their asses and thus prove their theories wrong. Hard to have a hard-on for no-holds-barred winners when you're a loser.

lmao absolute fucking retard

>search for a better solution to capitalism than communism if you dont like it
Both communism and capitalism are egalitarian, materialistic, internationalist ideologies though; they disagree on superficialities only. How can a thing be the "solution" to itself?

Attached: bd8.png (1190x906, 178K)

It simply increases atomisation of society by defining people by their most marginalised traits. If I am a gay blind tranny, I am first and foremost a tranny, then gay, then blind, based on how unique those qualities are. Like all forms of marxism it always does the opposite of what it proposes, economic marxism made everyone poorer, cultural marxism will make everyone lonelier.

Read the Society of the Spectacle.
Basically society devolved from being to having and from having to appearing. What you call 'Cultural Marxism' is just Capitalism in its natural progression. Pre capitalist societies were organised by who you were (being), hunter, mother, soldier, chief, etc. Early capitalism was organised by what you 'have', property, bonds, contractual rights etc. Late capitalism is defined by what you 'appear' as, in other words your 'identity', an identity in this context being a superficial label that you use to relate to other people. These relationships would then be 'mediated' via 'images' (television, marketing, advertising), it's the final commoditisation of our individual being.
Think of it this way, being gay is an incidental quality, it is by no means a defining characteristic, yet if you are gay then you must adhere to a set of behavioural patterns you are continuously promoted as being 'gay culture', your friendships and relationships will all continuously be governed by what is deemed through media to be acceptable for the gay community. You actually lose agency because of your need to fit in with the community you are now a part of. Friendships, relationships, and social roles are becoming more and more prescriptive.

So many butt hurt revo-larp-inaries in this thread... Bored lol...

Why are commies so frequently out of shape one way or another? I mean I know people living in a real communist society are out of shape cuz they're starving to death, but how come Starbucks Marxists are so frequently fat af, or scrawny and weak?

I have my own theories, but I want to see if any other anons have recognized this phenomenon... I have NEVER met a person of Euorpean descent, that was a Marxist and not also out of shape.

Cope

>Cultural Marxism
/pol/ leave

Attached: 68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f (184x184, 10K)

>Some bullshit by a literal who