How does his philosophy take into account that life might just be a computer simulation?
How does his philosophy take into account that life might just be a computer simulation?
Charles Rivera
Other urls found in this thread:
ncatlab.org
twitter.com
Brayden Cooper
>How does his philosophy take into account that life might just be a computer simulation?
Sebastian Ortiz
>Absolut spirit is a gpu
Oliver Garcia
Fuck off
Adam Jones
shut the fuck up
Bentley Peterson
Societies still evolve in sim games. The goal in those games is still the same as ours, but we're not experiencing it in the same way because of our POV.
Luke Morales
The way to deal with the possibility that life is a computer simulation is to consider that the existence of life is a consequence of our universe. Our belief that this is true means that we must acknowledge that something must exist to simulate it. The same can be said about the other possibilities.
Theoretically, as it stands the only possible answer is the existence of an immaterial, indestructible god, which I will not discuss here because it seems too absurd. But we should not let our belief in these possible answers to our questions shut us up. We have the universe and the answers to our questions, which I will discuss here.
Let's consider the last possible answer: a god could not create life. This should seem very strange to most of us, who are taught and believe that the universe is finite and finite only exists in finite numbers. If life had been created on an indestructible, immortal computer, however, it would still only exist in that computer, not in a place of it (a virtual world).
Connor Garcia
It doesn't need to because your theory is not truth
Ayden Morris
It contains truth though. We just need to find the anti-thesis and look for the middle ground
Jason Adams
Bruh What kind of response is this in this thread
Hegel is known for unironical originator of problem of Self, a subject of philosophy of mind(very analytical).
He may indeed be involved in this type of questions. Tell OP that I don't know how Hegel got involved to this question if you don't know before telling him to go to Reddit.
David Allen
I think that only applies to statements that you know are true though.
what if you started with a false statement?
Mason Scott
read Hegel, he will tell you why this method doesn't work when he critiques Fichte
Samuel Rogers
How does living in a simulation change anything hegel said?
Alexander Taylor
Hey ive just thought of something.
According to karl marx throughout history the proliteriat started with 100% rights during primitive society and then lost them when the slave society was established then gained their rights back as time went on.
What if we apply that to womens rights.
That would imply primitive societies were matriarchies and then lost their rights and started to gain their rights back again as time went on.
That would imply that primitive societies were matriarchies though.
Were primitive societies matriarchies?
All of this sounds kind of spooky desu.
Easton Sullivan
Hegel was a simulation
ncatlab.org
John Ramirez
>According to karl marx throughout history the proliteriat started with 100% rights during primitive society
According to Karl Marx, primitive societies didn't have rights; rights only develop alongside the differentiation between personal and communal interests.
Aaron Garcia
Ive just thought of something else.
As the proles got more rights they also got more responsibilities.
This means that for socialism to work the proles would need to have even more responsibility than under capitalism.
This makes it not ideal since under capitalism people already work 40 hours or more per week how can you cram more responsibility on top of that?
Also society is more complex than any other time in history making it even more difficult.
Hudson Thomas
Marx was against the concept of rights, they are a construction to support individual interests over society, read the German Ideology where he gives a concise historical account of rights and their use by bourgeois interests (i.e. the defense of personal property). Marx would have never said socialism gives workers "more rights".
Alexander Torres
>This makes it not ideal since under capitalism people already work 40 hours or more per week how can you cram more responsibility on top of that?
You cut production in half.
>Also society is more complex than any other time in history making it even more difficult.
A lot of this complexity is a side effect of the species not controlling its own life but letting an automatic mechanism with its own agenda control this life for it.
Society would of course still be more complex even without this additional unnecessary complexity, but our technological means of dealing with complexity are more powerful as well.
Jacob Roberts
You know, few things posted on this site make me angry anymore. But this, this is insulting on a primal level. I don't know why.
Gavin Rogers
>simulation ex nilho
nice meme.