What are some good books about science that aren't Reddit?
What are some good books about science that aren't Reddit?
Juan Cox
Jose White
Principia Mathematica, Russel
Robert Russell
fpbp
Aaron Stewart
/thread
Lincoln Long
Philosophie Zoologique
David Bell
>science
>logic
Josiah Rivera
Part science, part philosophy, and beautifully written.
Brandon Rogers
Monod, Chance and Necessity
Ryder Barnes
>logic isn't science
:|
Joshua Brown
Carlo Rovelli's popular stuff is pretty good if you want to learn a bit about physics. Susskind has some hits and misses but is generally a-ok. If you want to get a conceptual understanding of String Theory - read Greene's trilogy.
t. physicist
Mason Ortiz
The Joyous Science by Nietzsche
Benjamin Gomez
This is really really bad... if you want to know the foundation of mathematics I recommend Enderton's Elements of Set Theory. It actually follow some aspect of Principia Mathematica like cardinal after ordinal.
The reason why I don't recommend is because foundation of mathematical logic improved. Just the power of ZFC most of mathematician define some concept very easily. But this is not. This is ramified, type theory, with primitive attempt to axiomatize the concepts. Just the rambling consist of logic with so futile achievement... Also Some of the notion in logic is really hard to know, and more like unused - such as Sheffer Stroke and empty set as "∧".
Landon Hughes
Brandon Ward
What defines a book as "Reddit science"?
Asher King
How about Consciousness and the Brain by Dehaene
Elijah Bailey
This kills the scienceshit.
Nolan Jones
Science is reddit.
Grayson Kelly
When it has that gay message of "SCIENCE IS AWESOME!!! xdd"
James Bennett
So it's entirely about style of presentation?
Jackson Rogers
is this the antiaccel bot? did they expand its parameters or do you think it's learning?
Henry Jones
More like fpwp. Nobody reads this shit, not even the few analyticucks who still hold Russell in high regards.
Nice. Dehaene is seriously underrated.
It's about unreflexive validation. Science may be awesome, but for those who practice it it is equal measures confusing, disappointing, fascinating and frustrating. It also requires a lot of retarded work that is likly to go to waste anyway, and is as prone to fads, petty politics and circle-jerking as most other human fields of work.
t. someone who works daily with scientists
Jose Murphy
ASS
KYS
Joshua Thompson
Refute the meme, speedSTEMmer...
Oh yeah, you can't understand memes.
Michael Rodriguez
Reddit hates science. It's a leftist board.
Juan Campbell
Nah, they're liberals and libertarians. They worship science. The anti-science people tend to be on the right these days. They think climate change is just a big hoax propagated by the media.
Cameron Powell
the gay science
Zachary Cox
>aren't Reddit?
What in the fuck does this even mean? You're supposed to be able to read and write English on the fucking literature board you meme-loving fuck.
Connor Ortiz
Liberals are as far-left as you can get. There is nothing else, hence the conservative turn in all other arenas, or capitulation to liberalism.
Alexander Jackson
Hi Red-it.
Common traits of the Eternal Redditor
>says things like WTF does this even mean?
>is Anglo beyond the Poe's Law syntax
>hates memes
>'MODS!'
>finds ways to downvote wherever she is
>no one on the internet is white or male
>etc.
Grayson Ortiz
the mathematical experience or descartes dream
Jack James
you're right. math and logic aren't science. but guess what section it would be in at a book store?
Jose Thomas
Shut the fuck up you newfag. Christ.
Evan Cruz
>NO YOU'RE REDDIT
Nice dv fag.
James Campbell
There is no reason for you to learn about science unless you need it for a profession. Also, you won't understand science by reading a book. You have to study a field of it rigorously