Are Stefan Molneux's books worth reading?

e-celeb books are generally not worth it

Works where? Where has it been tried?

Stalin and Hitler had one thing in common. Their authoritativeness. They forced everyone to be cucked to the state and killed millions of people.
Liberalism and conservatism are one step in the right direction for freedom. The next step is to go full freedom for libertarianism. The free market will solve our problems. We're civilized now. We don't compete with war. We compete in the free market.

>literally braindead

Throughout history man has competed through war.
Now that we're civilized and more human, we have decided to compete in the free market. Only savages who can't compete in the free market are the ones who pursue antifreedom ideologies

Attached: accurate spectrum.jpg (640x479, 42K)

>And yet it works.jpg

You're larping only boomers with IQs below 85 talk like that, but Germany under national-socialism was the most powerful country on the planet man-for-man. So powerful it was one city (Stalingrad) away from being the European hegemony, a feat unrivalled since the Roman empire. To this day we use spacecraft technology pioneered in Nazi Germany in our satellites and rockets.

I don't really care for Germans anyway, I feel more at home reading Jefferson, Franklin, and even Romans and Greeks. These men understood the virile and masculine virtues that underpinned society; think of a country with freedom, a society where people love the common good and people work towards the common good of their own accord, that is the result of an ideal order, but freedom itself is not its moral underpinning.

Attached: Acid Attacks.jpg (710x1210, 346K)

Attached: Aristotle - Philia.png (1008x760, 1.59M)

Yeah yeah they wuz kangz and shieet but guess what, it's gone now it couldn't even last 2 decades. Nazism always results in war because nazis are violent savages. They're not civilized beings who can compete with other humans in a civilized society and its free market.
Modern nazis are domestic terrorists and carry out shootings where 50 plus people die.

Liberalism and conservatism have good elements which we need to merge to produce true freedom. As human evolution dictates.
Throughout history humanity has moved towards more freedom. First we had religious freedom, then economic freedom and now social freedom. Work still needs to be done but we need more economic freedom than we've got.

I'm not seriously responding to this comment. Failing at obtaining military victory is not the same as a system collapsing internally like the USSR. It's like saying capitalism and monarchy are bad ideologies because Britain failed to keep the 13 colonies, or that Islam is a bad religion because it lost out to Christianity. You're getting emotional and the fact that you conflate a mass shooting with a state-level ideology like national-socialism or Roman republicanism shows you don't have your head in the right place.

Do yourself a favour and read this book. Don't worry, it's not Mein Kampf, it's Aristotle's Politics. Then read Murray's Human Accomplishment. Then, I don't know, read evolutionary psychology lol, it's something Ayn Rand didn't consider and is objectively true. My beliefs don't come from an individual author, I'm not an ideologue like that. Just read a lot and you'll begin to see the underlying truth.

>Aristotle Politics, Audiobook
youtube.com/watch?v=d3gVry2xoOE

Attached: California Skin Games.png (640x443, 53K)

Also you're just wrong on freedom. Economic freedom has linearly declined in North America and across the West since the 18th and 19th centuries and social freedom has declined in some aspects (see: free speech).

You're clearly a nazi if you're suggesting Charles Murray.
There's only successes and failures in this world. Nazi Germany is a fucking failure and you're a fucking failure for defending it. Nazis are commies.
No difference between a failure and a failure kiddo. This is the real world. True nazism was tried and it always results in war because they're savages.

Economic freedom has declined because of corruption and lobbying in the government which regulates a barrier of entry to businesses. We remove the barrier of entry and save economic freedom by reducing taxes and making governments smaller.

Well I tried. Also good luck removing economic barriers with a brown America retard, it was a mistake trying to reason with you. Hopefully someone lurking got something useful out of this interaction.

>chart only includes rightist names

Hmmm

>Alex Jones
Not a pseud. He has no pretensions of intellectualism. He's a modern day fire and brimstone folk hero, not a philosopher.
>Ann Coulter
She's a pundit not a philosopher, the fact that she's a dumb bitch not withstanding.
>Stefan
He's the closest thing on this list to a proper intellectual. His takes are pretty heterodox, and he's more intellectually honest/consistent than a large portion of bonafide academics. Just because libertarianism is sort've stupid doesn't mean that there isn't a philosophical tradition there. He isn't a pseud.
>Joe Rogan
Again, Rogan doesn't have any pretensions of being an intellectual. He's as low brow as it gets, and it's pretty obvious that he knows this and is content with it.

An actual pseud would be someone like JBP, Shapiro, David French, etc.

You have to wonder just what kind of shit his mother did to him to make him like this.

Attached: Stefan_Molyneux_2014-02-10.jpg (630x641, 54K)

I honestly wouldn't care about white people 'dying out' if it wasn't FUCKING CURRIES AND CHINKS flooding Western countries. Why can't it be cute Japanese and Persian girls? Why does it have to be Sun Dixwang and Pajeet?

Wow you're a retard

You're pathetic. You just did the intellectual equivalent of running away with your fingers in your ears.

Not an argument

No. He was making excuses for nazi Germany.
>they only lost because others defeated them
Why did they pick a fight in the first place against the entire world? That's stupid. Starting a war and being violent is also stupid. Guess what survived? Free ideologies. Freedom increases every year.

no but his Twitter feed is quite based

Japanese and Persians have low birthrates. They're too similar to white people. The entire purpose of society is to produce the 20% of men to guide the 80%. With a higher population you can get more of the 20%.

anyone remember around 2012-2014 when he was just a slightly eccentric uncle on youtube who loved libertarianism

what the fuck is this thread

Attached: 1567951715450.jpg (1920x1080, 376K)

Anti freedom cucks getting btfo and schooled for their loser ideologies.

He's Jewish

Why does the free market end up with monopolies, then?

Why do anti-trust laws exist?

Monopolies exist because of government intervention. Remove lobbying, remove government policies and regulations and people will easily be able to compete.

Monopolies exist because big fish eats little fish. Libertarianism results in the richest person owning everything, which is just another form of dictatorship. The history of telecom companies is proof of this.

>So powerful it was one city (Stalingrad) away from being the European hegemony, a feat unrivalled since the Roman empire.
Scary stuff
Is this guy right, Yea Forums? pls bluepill me

Good post.

>absolute genius
what a masterful wordsmith you are, please, tell me more how freedom survived, when germany isn't allowed to have an army and nuclear warheads imposed by the ones who used 2 of them on civilian population.

ok retard.

The future is looking good for Quebec separatism.