Should one write for the critics or the general public?

should one write for the critics or the general public?

Attached: hmm.png (1038x528, 83K)

For himself

basiert und rotpilliert.
close the thread.

If you're writing for other people, then it should only be for $$$.

Write for yourself and then at least one person will like it

first post best post.
time and time again this has been true. I wonder what's the mystery behind.

Für ewig

One should only ever write for God.

But something nonexistent can't read it once it has been written?

I write for my fans.

To their personal interest
Perhaps both
I would say themself.

Has that gratified you?
Do you ever feel at odds with this? Have you ever written something else under a different name or considered doing such?

Chapelle’s new stand up was funny enough. Nothing particularly outstanding about it. Why is it so polarising?

Because people know truth a priori, whatever intuitively comes to mind and feels “right” in response to a question is true

I write for my friends.

Attached: q.jpg (210x240, 19K)

Yeah, it was okay. Bill Burr's new special is funnier.

It's essentially backlash from these critics bring ideology into it. They originally had it at a 0% and basically told people it was irredeemable.
This just caused a massive streisand effect, loads of people now want to give it a good review since they despise how it was falsely considered pure crap for obvious political reasons.

bringing ideology*

Chappelle's standup does nothing for me. I wish he would go back to sketch comedy.

Arrogant Athiest

Neither

The special was a solid 6. Enjoyed watching it, couple sort of memorable parts, but nothing worth revisiting.

Based critics. Fuck that plagiarizing n-word.