Who is the literary equivalent of Dougie Jones?
Who is the literary equivalent of Dougie Jones?
UG Krishnamurti at the height of his experiences.
*ting ting ting*
*ahem*
FUCK Twin Peaks season 3 and FUCK Dougie and FUCK jannies and FUCK trannies.
Cringe
The Return > FWWM > The good parts of season 2 > season 1 > season 2
good soldier svejk
Fix your heart or die.
i can't even tell anymore if you guys are baiting or just plain retarded, and i suspect even yourself can't tell.
This is pretty correct, though I d move the movie around abit
Also hes right, Season 3 was some of the best fucking TV ever made, if you dont like it then you never liked Lynch. If you didnt like lynch then why the fuck did you watch Twin Peaks for? I hope it wasnt for Le Reddit comfy corky show..
>authentically enjoying FWWM more than S1
Pain, anger, confusion
Me because I've only written like 4 words and all my ideas are just things real authors have already said
I don't know but Gregor Samsa is definitely the inverse of Dougie Jones
S3 = FWWM > S2Lynch = S1Lynch > S1 >>> S2
Based. Fuck comfy normies.
I hope Lynch pretends to cave in to the S4 beggars and proceeds to slaughter every beloved character
>NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST TREAT AUDREY LIKE THAT
Fuck off, retard. Lynch loves Peaks and its characters more than you'll ever know. S3 was a testament to that, you're too much of a brainlet to see it.
Seethe harder. You're not getting any more cherry pie
No, if Lynch ever decides to make a Season 4 its literally just going to be a slice-of-life story about the mystery of Gordon Cole's missing slipper as he gradually descends into dementia
What are you blabbering about, retard? S3 did, in fact, have quite a lot of cherry pie, and if he ever returns to TP, I'm sure there will be cherry pie again.
Anyway, I've absolutely no reason to seethe, since I love S3.
Gertrude Stein?
Chris-chan?
you may be joking, but I can see this being an actual production.
Based, I would probably swap S1 with the good parts of S2 but otherwise good job.
both of those are not pure hearted. their mental illness is deserved (though Gertrude was of course feigning in her writing)
An older Borges.
>their mental illness is deserved
Why are some newborn babies hacked apart? Sorry, non-sequiter and all, but if people get what they deserve then why don't "pure-hearted" and innocent babies get what they deserve? Really makes you think, y'know.
T.screaming at Nature
Transcend it then, reform Audrey into your babe to save her from that fate.
Disorder is order; I was not speaking here about God giving them mental illness tho, I was judging those people, their actions, as responsible.
I know that new-born babies getting hacked apart, children in africa starving, my eventual madness and breakdown, are all worth it.
I just don't feel it. And I know that other people not knowing it is worth it. You keep your moral lens if you want.
I can accept personal responsibility, but what about cosmic necessity? How can you know? Other than pure intuition, which you must obviously move beyond even just to post, what reasonable (or at least describable) train of thought are you taking to get there?
I'm not entirely certain that this falls under morals. To me, it's a matter of pure ontology.