What do I read if I want to attract a boy that will put a dress for me?

Are you ESL or just stupid

Attached: 1852D466-1A21-43BE-8F4F-1CC1F672898A.jpg (200x191, 8K)

Yes, ESL and a bit stupid.

>using jewgle
>current year
I hear they have lots of literature on that in hell.

Stupid ESL fags. OP is a retard who does not know basic English.

these little verbal phrases are notoriously hard for people learning english because theyre practically arbitrary and random

the way we use get is particularly bad

Get on.

>tfw cumbrain and trying really hard to not google this
>tfw already worked out as hard as i could to try and satisfy my masculine desires
>tfw it didn't work

Attached: 1560470456391.jpg (440x351, 9K)

I suppose but in almost any instance I can think of you can omit "get" and still have the same meaning in your sentence

This thread is a about wanting to fuck sissy boys and love is a universal language. Sorry you never learned to speak it, mid 20s khv.

Gotta git got

Got ist tot

Just close this tab, listen to your favorite album, and walk around outside for awhile
cumbrain

Attached: 4B15B5FA-EEDD-46D4-B7EC-2C52FED3650C.jpg (320x371, 62K)

Ummmm.... noooo.

it ain't easy bein' cumbrain

GOTT

IST

TOT

youtube.com/watch?v=2QkNkbkSm-A

Attached: D0FD68BB-9CEB-4560-B1E1-F36A4BD28305.png (350x350, 114K)

the one in which she is wearing the chastity cage is better

The part where she gets fucked in the ass isn't that good compared to the part where she's putting on make up. That got me rock hard.

fais l'amour

Attached: E28B891C-7A2E-487F-943D-CDE83E299E76.jpg (750x932, 154K)

its a boy. everyone calm down.

The size difference between their balls in that video is so fucking amazing.

what the fuck are you talking about? what OP said was fucking literal

It's missing the word ON you brainlet. ON for me. Not a dress for me. Put a dress ON.

ON

You peaked my interest and I'm impressed by it's voice and small bone structure. I cringed at the "Trained at the Sissy Institute" shit though. Cringed hard.

If you want to self insert as a feminine subject but are not as prissy as him you may as well just watch gay porn or get better at self insertion and watch straight porn whilst feeling for the female in the porn. Or females, if lez stuff counts as straight for a man.

Attached: 1408609446478.png (427x344, 127K)

Is it really worth the effort?

>I cringed at the "Trained at the Sissy Institute" shit though. Cringed hard.
oh really? thats the part of the gay porno that offended you?

Attached: 1520485078071.jpg (640x789, 47K)

>If you want to self insert as a feminine subject
I don't mean to speak for anyone else, but me, I just wanna pump a dude in a dress full of cum. I'm a simple guy.

>If you want to self insert as a feminine subject
Your way of phrasing this is the gayest thing ITT so far

no, you're a fag

Attached: 1488339505086.jpg (248x189, 24K)

a real answer to this question is Death in Venice.

oh I don't want a real answer I just want to get more people into sissy dudes so I feel normal

thus is life as a discord tranny.

I get you man. I'm right there with you.

What a shame

I think put on a dress is more accurate because put a dress on for me seems ambiguous

ah fuck, is everyone on Yea Forums turning into me, or am I just turning into everyone on Yea Forums, or are we all just like this?

Attached: 1562653078017.jpg (640x640, 183K)

This might help

Attached: 64315422_2497006173664196_5007305922897248256_n.jpg (150x150, 4K)

What am I looking at?

That's the "girl" in OP's thumb.

That is inaccurate

Are you autistic?

homosexuality is it's own punishment.
the feces particles will enter your blood stream and cause brain damage, adding to what already exists.

straight men are doomed then, they're all obsessed with anal

Wrong, I love looking at a tight clean butthole but I don't want to ever penetrate one

anal is always gay and dumb, the anus is a one way street. cope.

patrician.

You googled the name and saw that picture at like row 70 and assumed they were the same person.

That is Ricardo Juan Maysoneta fucking mexican follower of her twitter account.

Why is it that people who are so scared of being attracted to trannies are always so low IQ? I'm guessing you have to at least be average to go against the grain of societal expectation.

>You googled the name and saw that picture at like row 70 and assumed they were the same person.
that's fucking hilarious, and so is the fact that he saw 70 rows of pictures of her while telling himself he's not attracted to trannies/crossdressers at all.

>Why is it that people who are so scared of being attracted to trannies
same reason some pedophiles/rapists/violent/drug addicts fight their base desires to shame themselves and other people, despite the modern "if it feels good do it" yolo injunction.

Watch anime and read Mangas. I'm not kidding.

Straight men are only "obsessed" with anal insofar that women make it a taboo.

Though, it seems women are turning the corner on that, which will make anal not so cherished.

Eitherway, sex is disgusting.

>peaked my interest

Plato's Symposium

...

Anal is disgusting. You want something tight to fuck, get a watermelon.

Attached: A6BB0DC7-681B-4259-BB28-DE73BF6D58FC.gif (250x250, 830K)

>just bee urself

>hemorrhoids causes brain damage
>if you get an anal fissure or whipe too hard you get brain damaged
Sounds like you're having yourself a little cope there bruh.

Projection.

Tons of guys like it up the ass in secret even though straight.

It's a self insertion thing when you go without sex too long and has to do with being prison gay.

>holds her cig like an amerilard

join me on discord and we'll talk about it ;)

she's cute as fuck

Yea Forums is so worried about being gay that y'all are being gay in the process lmao (not attracted to attractive woman)

inb4 not a "real" woman. who gives a fuck?

Men only want anal when your vaginal is used up. You sound like you get requests for anal often.

Even if he were an actual woman, the makeup is disgusting

as if makeup alone is a significant factor to single-handedly influence something as complicated, non-black and white as sexual attraction

bad makeup? sure. doesn't mean that the person still isn't attractive

stop looking for excuses and just admit they're attractive you nerd

cool it with the transphobia

Attached: 1565314122670.gif (320x253, 2.49M)

*significant enough

I’m attracted to the female sex. A male that looks female is okay, but inadequate for sexual relations for me. Being gay or bi and into it is fine, but stop being smarmy about it.

wait I thought you were into xenofeminism? you can't be a terf and a xenofeminist you retard

If English was your first language it would not matter. At this point arguing over the definition of dress would matter.
>is this about salad?
>oh noes what does salad mean?
Both are acceptable due to context mattering. If bothered by things like slang then the word awful would randomly bother you as it is old slang. Grammar is more fluid than it is in books in real life.

>put a dress for me
doesn't sound good, it would be more like saying
>put salad dressing for me
which doesn't sound right either. I understand that you could read into it but there's no point in berating ESL speakers just because OP is functionally illiterate

XF isn’t materialist? Than I am not XF. I am a schismatic again.

Attached: 00B73608-958B-40E8-84BB-DB1A9480681B.jpg (340x499, 26K)

In what way ambiguous?

"to put on" is a compound verb, if you are doing the verb "for me" I don't see how that's ambiguous.

>thinks ontological materialism has literally anything to do with gender
holy shit did someone steal your trip or are you actually outing yourself as having severe syndrome

Terf is your word. And you can keep XF if you think it’s all about trans people being what they can actually only wish

"How to put a revolver against my own head and shoot it" should be good reading for you OP, OP is a faggot

>The construction of freedom involves not less but more alienation; alienation is the labour of freedom’s construction. Nothing should be ac-cepted as fixed, permanent, or ‘given’—neither material conditions nor so-cial forms. XF mutates, navigates and probes every horizon. Anyone who’s been deemed ‘unnatural’ in the face of reigning biological norms, anyone who’s experienced injustices wrought in the name of natural order, will real-ize that the glorification of ‘nature’ has nothing to offer us—the queer and trans among us, the differently-abled, as well as those who have suffered discrimination due to pregnancy or duties connected to child-rearing. XF is vehemently anti-naturalist. Essentialist naturalism reeks of theology—the sooner it is exorcised, the better.
from the second paragraph of the xenofeminist manifesto, can you please fucking read book if you insist on shitting up this already shit-filled board?

>materialism is materialism and girls are girls
Yeah and the vagina is designed to accept a penis in order to be inseminated, guess you should stop being gay. Or do you not believe in materialism? You were designed to take cocks, butterfly

discord tranny shoot yourself you insufferable faggot, your parents are disappointed in you for a fucking reason you deserve to be mutilated and killed, maybe mutilation is too good for you though

>u red a manifesto u must b trans
No, just literate

Kind of a one-trick pony, aren't you now Ahab?

Dark Psychology, Victor sykes

48 laws of power, Robert Greene

The Person: An introduction to the science of personality psychology, McAdams

Can Personality Change, Joel Weinberger

Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus, John Gray, Ph.D.

Feminizing Hormone Therapy, Trans Primary Care Guide

>no point in gatekeeping
He can go to /int/.

all lgbt people should be strung up or put in bronze bulls, you included for reading a faggot manifesto unironically and caring enough about it to correct somebody on an imageboard

>trying to make Marx et al into Platonists
>trying to make me out to be prejudiced against a mental impairment
Expected.

I accept the functionality of heterosexuality. Why would you think I don’t?
At issue is the sanity of it. I am a happy homosexual. Trans are by definition dysphoric. A sad state for them. Can technology come to make their dreams come true, or would it be easier to cure their dysphoria? Either way I wish them well and do not “exclude” them

Attached: C491CF29-7029-4BAF-AAEC-2F1E69A38E4D.jpg (800x800, 147K)

butterfly I've had to correct your brainlet takes on Marx way to many times to ever take your opinion on the subject seriously; you have disqualified yourself
>Trans are by definition dysphoric
that's not the definition of trans people, you don't need dysphoria to transition retard.
>do not “exclude” them
You literally excluded them from the category of "sane" lmao. How old are you again butterfly? Could this be the early grips of dementia?

tits are the gtfo roasty bitch

>Marx isn’t a materialist
Oh
>Trans people aren’t unhappy with their.... doh
>Hey, furries are also dysphoric
I know
>Trans don’t have anything wrong with their heads. They just have the wrong bodies!
>You’re the one with the mental problems (for not liking cock)
Get well soon.

I sure do love slurpping on big chad cock all day, i'd never ever fuck an incel in my entire life which is why i want them to all turn into sissy white boy trannies, trancels are just incels sweaty :))))

seething tranny

I can't believe I need to say this again, ontological materialism does not make any inherent claims about social categories like gender, you understand why right? You do know what materialism means in philosophy? And if you can find me anything about trans people needing to experience gender dysphoria in order to qualify as trans I would love to read it, all the literature I have read on the topic says the opposite.

...

I agree with both of those posts

Then don't learn English faggot.

Go back to your birthplace where they don't speak English.

>Dark Psychology, Victor sykes

You got a pdf/epub of this? It's not on #bookz

>time to get ready for bed
>can you get that?
>I get it
>get a couple things for me while you're there

based white knight

Have you tried libgen?

No, I don't seem to be able to get a working link anymore. All the proxies just fail for me.

>ambiguous
If the context changes it can be put the dress on top of something or similar rather than on you. "Put a dress on what" some non-english speaker might think if in the wrong order. Yoda probably confuses the shit out of them.

Then again in other languages people say things rather backwards, like, the house of user, rather than user's house.

It's a grammar thing. Put the dress on you, not on what.

I'm actually the guy that posted the 2hu of Marissa vomiting that was ironically thinking about switching it around when he wrote the sentence of which is why "on for me" and "put a dress on" is also there implying both are fine as long as something like on is there (or around himself etc before the word 'for'). The point is that the sentence is obviously not finished grammatically in the OP. You can't even call that grammar, it has no logical flow. The dress does what to the boy? What about the dress? The dress is on, it is draped, etc, but it is missing the preposition it needs. Or adjective. Or verb. ON being a preposition probably mind-fucked the OP I guess. Things like adjectives vs prepositions are confusing to non-english speakers I'm sure. He just threw up his hands and decided it needed no adjective there, no verb, no preposition. Just said "fuck it" because all that mattered was the bait image as he laughed and shitposted. He's probably an Eng speaker really, he was probably laughing too hard as he typed.

tl;dr: order obviously can effect meaning with grammar though in this instance it obviously does not.

>those people fighting their instincts
That's virtue signalling. They do not actually feel that way. Virtue signalling is just a two-faced way to hide from witch hunters.

Darn, Ill see if I can find any substitutes