Where do I start with Nick Land?

what do people think of this literary take

Attached: Screenshot_20190823-232710__01.jpg (1080x1256, 243K)

Keep twitter in its place.

Attached: 1533706275149.png (989x576, 398K)

reddit.com/r/sorceryofthespectacle/comments/83mc5p/discord_server_with_a_focus_on_accelerationism/

I forgot to include Yhwh’s penis. Could you paste that in instead of the ideal self of nix?

Attached: D485F827-4667-4DBF-9DD4-D27964E887E9.jpg (1461x786, 236K)

reddit

Can Nick Srnicek save L/acc?
Has he fall into the yang gang meme?

Attached: images (1).jpg (663x1080, 77K)

>the castration symbology as hypertext of eternal patriocapital
An unfortunate omission.

Attached: yang.png (618x344, 40K)

How will hyperaccelerated technocapital deterritorialize the soi surplus?

Attached: srniceknick.x6baf451a.png (500x500, 346K)

Can anyone defeat him?

Solid start.
Market could go to all time highs again.

Attached: 1559262217539-jpg--198384-jpg.jpg (300x400, 20K)

Good nap?

Attached: yep only 3 threads up making the call.jpg (300x400, 15K)

I can't understand any of this. WTF is predicted(horrofied)? Isn't NRx belongs to Alt Right umbrella? Yang Gang feels what? What more? What is Demotism? It's not on the dictionary. Demotism should do what?
>Might as well get on with it
What is it? What is get on with it?

Why would you care about eceleb bullshit?

makes sense to me

yang is a fascist

Unless you are schizoid, you can explain why it makes sense, right?

I believe there’s a curse upon Land’s teachings that brings ruin to anyone who pursues them. No real reason for me to say it, just a concept thats been floating around my head for some time.

DO YOU LIKE TO GO FAST

Attached: screen-shot-2017-10-18-at-1-46-41-pm-e1508351385743.jpg (1600x800, 125K)

Like the pop science meme of Riemann hypothesis?

For anyone who's wondering, this is an attempt at cursing via chaos magick.

almost everything we see and think is a curse

the good way is a very small path in the chaos that is incredibly hard to find

>Literally the same autistic faggot astroturfing an accelerationism thread with the same memes and same tired out phrases
Now, I only wonder if this is purposeful to either dissuade people from following Land and gleaming some insight into what is in store for the future, or if you are genuinely an autistic low-iq retard. Maybe both.

are you autistic

Attached: 812BC654-CBA5-4DD5-881B-D64FAB2B2F8E.png (771x723, 680K)

Your taste for irony is getting lost under the blizzard of fake identities. Still, I’m enjoying it.

>only one person could possibly dislike the greatest philosophy of all time
Lmao
Are you r/aut from the other thread?

Yeah, proof is in the other thread. It's why they're so shit at memes.

Neo-Vagina arrives from the future. Autogynephilia morphs, adapts.

Attached: NeoVagina.png (1887x910, 349K)

You post this in every single thread that gets the slightest criticism. Perhaps a/acc all have autism?

accelerationists are autists

Hot. Very nice to have a rectal orgasm while subsuming oneself to phallocapital transterritorialization.

Attached: vhy gum gabbidull.jpg (695x399, 126K)

NEO RETARDS ARRIVE FROM THE FUTURE

>rescheduled Tower Cages, Gutter Oil, and Beyond
>wife's not too happy
>but I'll be on all day

Attached: back to ccru got it.jpg (600x400, 59K)

Damn, imagine having to work with her next week
youtu.be/tRbYI64tJo8

Why did he resent the hardcore kids so much?
youtu.be/VVqDjpk_2hg

Accelerationism misunderstands time and the essence of capital, yet conflates these two theories into a future-valorisation machine pulling humanity into its processes. It creates a false One of the human techno-psyche, thus its process philosophy (technical relativism) is nothing more than a fictionalised deterritorialisation digging its own grave.

>marx didn't understand capital
>marx was an accelerationist
>accelerationism has nothing to do with capital
>only Land understands capital
>stop talking about marx
>stop talking about Land
>your critique does not include a critique of anti-accelerationists and non-capital
>marx was an accelerationist
>capital has nothing to do with valorisation
What level of autism are we on here?

Attached: Venomous Butterfly.jpg (1379x5738, 2.15M)

hey paste this sweet knockers in there too?

Attached: 99589.jpg (641x482, 59K)

>he still doesn't get it
Do you want me to explain those points to you again? I know philosophy can be hard but I'm still willing to try and help you if you would just try and engage with it

SHISH

Attached: ASS.png (513x431, 93K)

hahahaha you made this pic since last night? holy shit how badly did he push your shit in user?

I like it.

autism

Yeah, bro, I was up all night tossing and turning. The part that really got me was how accelerationism really has nothing to do with capital, valorization, and industrial rationalism - it's really just a process of whatever the latest sublogist posts on twitter.

This is the samefag who posts in every thread accusing anyone who criticizes accelerationism of being a lone autist.

>yep, not like our tasty baked memes

Attached: 1538523674426.jpg (640x480, 76K)

>accelerationism really has nothing to do with capital
user, you know very well the point was that l/acc believes the motor of history lays outside of capital and therefore your accusations of accelerationists turning capital into a godhead wasn't a useful argument against accelerationism as a whole. I don't think you want to get back into this user, it really didn't play out for you last time

Here you go

Attached: Venomous Butterfly.jpg (1379x5738, 2.23M)

dude what the fuck

desu it's that glowing degree
really scared everyone off

the only person against accelerationism is the biggest schizo on the board, how did this happen

Attached: Screenshot_20190824-094255__01.jpg (1080x1349, 381K)

So Butterfly truly is one of us now. I don't know how to feel about this.

Why do you keep bringing up my degree? That's what you meant when you were talking about glowing papers in the other thread right?

You should explain the point of this post for all the slow posters.

lol put this one in too when you get a chance
I'm told there are more pics somewhere out there

Attached: 399388933.jpg (641x482, 42K)

She's read parts of Zeros and Ones, at best she's a wannabe xenofeminist

>Why do you keep bringing up my degree?
KEK

Okay user, good joke..

So a true ACC

lmao how the fuck did this even come about? people hack your cam on lit?
good thing i'm an autist

Attached: Capital called.jpg (1366x768, 96K)

why does this guy seem more and more unhinged every time he shows up in an accelerationist thread?

I mean, I think this is kind of just what attention whores do?

Won't explain it because they don't understand it either.

This should help you
>The Neoreactionary critique is in fact directed at demotic government, a regime class that includes democracy, authoritarian populism, and socialist ‘people’s republics’. The reliable signature of this class is that its members legitimate themselves through democracy, however their various levels of democracy are gauged by social scientific analysis. North Korea self-identifies as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (and to a formalist, this is of ineliminable significance). Since it is the principle of democratic legitimation that NRx denounces, its models are restricted to a far more compact class than ‘non-democracies’ — namely, to non-demotic states: with absolute monarchies and colonial regimes as the purest historical examples, supplemented by restricted-franchise commercial republics (17-18th century United Provinces and United Kingdom*), (still virtual) Joint-Stock Republics, and demotically-compromised Confucian Autocracies, plus rightist military juntas (since Pinochet cannot reasonably be excluded). As soon as regimes of such types are statistically amalgamated with socialist / populist dictatorships, the theoretical chaos is irredeemable.

His prose is awful, so no

yang became such a good goy so fast. all the supposed twitter acc that supported yang now try to erase their memory of even having acknowledged him.

Attached: Untitled.png (633x316, 33K)

It’s a shame, really
That cap was peak aesthetic

they were all shilling him and then self cringed out of existence. prime example why twittards dont really know what theyre talking about.

Nyx was shitting on him from day one and Land almost had a mental breakdown trying to do backflips around how Yang's not a real thing and muh right wing populism. Twitter as a whole did go for him though so you are right on that aspect
>twittards
do people even try anymore?

land is just hilariously tending his spawn. for the most part i just find it disappointing to see contemporaries fall into obvious decel shill ploys. anything more than that i find hard to give a shit about.

I don't know why. I've stopped believing this to be a girl which fills me with utter disgust. I remember the first time when these pics were posted on here I fantasized about the possibility of a Yea Forums gf. I became aroused by all the implications following this thought and felt the urge to stroke my fully errect penis which I did. Looking back I've come to the conclusion that my unaware self had fapped to a tranny back then.

>what's an attention whore for 500, Alex

the only cure is castration; become one of them

Hi, sam/acc.

Based and Checked.
And what does it advocate in turn? The same fucking shit it supposedly critiques.

I've only ever had a facebook page to log in for certain events that people didn't post anywhere else (come to think of it, this was a great sign of the end). Never had twitter.
How many points do I get?

Can't blame her with a bod like that.

Oh god I really hope so. Bring on the technofascist future please. Just fucking upload me to the cloud, senpai.

what does "it" mean here? what are you referring to

What is the post about? That is the "it".

Yang gang? Demotism? NRx?

What's the dominant subject?

Socratic memeism

fpbp

Well, I don't know because I only posted that quote as a reference to help understand Land's twitter post, so I don't know if you are responding to the twitter post using the quote as a reference or just responding to the quote outside the larger context of conversation.

If I was referring to the twitter post I would have responded to it.
The "it" was NRx.

Oh, well I don't think anyone takes NRx seriously anymore. How could they ever recover after this?

Attached: DxnIesVU8AAkLbc.jpg large.jpg (675x675, 68K)

OP mysteriously lost his interest in Nick Land. I wonder why.

>Isn't NRx belongs to Alt Right umbrella?
not really
>Yang Gang feels what? What more?
a further culmination of the processes that previously culminated in the rise of the alt right
>What is Demotism?
similar to populism

Central banks about to release their digital currency. Goodbye, bitcoin.
Hate to say "I told you so."

Please do.

I thought this was based

You’re just putty in the hands of any suggestion, aren’t you? What a dumb twat

retard

Most of this is just him trying to strawman a whole threads worth of arguments, so if you aren't him/weren't in the thread this might be confusing
>marx didn't understand capital
Marx's definition of capital was too simple, not that he didn't understand it, more that he underestimated it. This is really something developed by Deleuze/Baudrillard more than anything
>marx was an accelerationist
Yes, when he advocated for revolutionary free trade he was suggesting possibly the earliest form of accelerationist politics
>accelerationism has nothing to do with capital
The point was that in the field of accelerationism, the processes which generate deterritorialization are not simply reducible to capital, Captial is the only "motor of modernity" only in specific right wing interpretations (like Old Land)
>only Land understands capital
I said his thoughts on the definition of accelerationism were important, that's about as uncontroversial of a statement as you can make
>stop talking about marx
Accelerationism abandoned Marxist dialectics in favor of Deleuze; obviously you can talk about Marx, he is still a foundational thinker for accelerationism. I even referenced the Question on Free Trade in the thread
>stop talking about Land
You were conflating Old and Young Land, that's all. Again, I was referencing Land in the thread
>your critique does not include a critique of anti-accelerationists and non-capital
I just wanted your critique to be aimed at accelerationism. you even admitted it was about economic determinism so even you know it was off base
>marx was an accelerationist
see above
>capital has nothing to do with valorisation
you confused deterritorialization with valorization, and conflated accelerationism with intelligence valorization, just because those things don't make sense doesn't mean you have to take it out on the whole concept

>Namefag thinking their words mean anything

Doesn’t even quote me.

Still thinking it over.
I really ought to get to my story. I think I’ve found some of you who might like it.

You're the true accelerationst, butterfly.
Will read.

Did you even post in that thread?

Doesn't look familiar

take g/acc pill

hi butterfly!

land sucks

i like Nick Land, he should do more interviews that are not hidden behind paywalls though.