In order for Marxism to remain relevant in the coming century, new theories and writing is desperately needed.
Marxists can't keep themselves doctrinally enslaved to the 20th century.
In order for Marxism to remain relevant in the coming century, new theories and writing is desperately needed.
Marxists can't keep themselves doctrinally enslaved to the 20th century.
Other urls found in this thread:
goodreads.com
discord.gg
twitter.com
cool dude. thanks for posting.
This is now a Michael Parenti thread
Slavoj Zizek is a retard, if you want to be edgy as a marxist just be a situationist, the irony is the fact that zizek is the most popular contemporary marxist is proof that marxism is dominated by champagne socialists academically.
ok read Haaglund then
Marxists are stuck in the 19th century. They still blabber on and on about muh LTV and muh historical materialism. Holy shit, get new theories because no one buys your prophetic bullshit.
Already have the Capital of the 21st century (and all time).
shut up retard, socialist thought has been continually updated and put into practice over the last 200 years. Pretending it's outdated or impractical bullshit when countries in the world practice its principles, it birthed multiple superpowers, and new books are constantly written on the topic is the gayest shit-brained cop-out ever.
lol Sorel already btfoed LTV
But then they wouldn't be Marxists.
Marxism is very popular on Yea Forums I'll never understand this since the intelligentsia is one of the first groups to be purged in a communist revolution, yet they themselves are the enablers.
Were proles you idiot. "Intellegentsia" are not 20 something indebted undergrads.
Marxism is dead.
That doesnt mean political economy is beyond critique which is the central feature of all leftist thought, that the economy is served by the workers and not the reverse. Literally just democratize production rather than leave it up to the whims of profit and youre halfway there.
Wrong
How so?
>Marxists can't keep themselves doctrinally enslaved to the 20th century.
Why? Capitalists do
Can you form a coherent sentence, please? if you did it'd be easier to understand what you're trying to say.
If you're saying people on Yea Forums are not the intellegentsia then I don't see your point.
First of all you're wrong. Many here have masters or doctor degrees in English or philosophy and even teachers and journalists are part of the intellegentsia, and you can be very young and be both of those. Further still the cheka were eager to kill many other types of educated people like medical doctors too.
Anyway what Yea Forums is or is not is not really relevant for the real point if my argument. Marxism is very popular in the humanities especially among professors, who would be purged.
someone on here told me chomsky was just a budget parenti and they were absolutely right. against empire and the face of imperialism are better than anything chomsky ever wrote
in popular academia yes marxism can be very stuck, but there are a lot of people doing real work otherwise that is firmly contemporary. that all said, the writings of lenin, marx/engels, mao, etc all still ring pretty true and just because they are older does not mean we shouldnt study them.
20th-21st century marxists like parenti and mark fisher did excellent jobs creating 21st century specific dialogues about marxism though for anyone interested. also juche is probably the most impressive modern marxist ideology and i would really encourage any marxists reading this to learn about it.
Commies aren't people and marxists are idiots.