What do softbois read?
What do softbois read?
Clearly Camus and Bret Easton Elis
podcasts
Still better books than women
They don't.
Onions Sauce for Beginners
The bibliography of the purchased personality "softboi" (or "sadboi") must be niche enough to appear "intellectual" and "sentimental" and "deep" to an untrained eye, but also accessible enough to remain recognizable and unconfusing and "not weird." So: Camus, Poe, Lovecraft, Tolkein, etc. as opposed to Burroughs, Rabelais, Aquinas, Euclid, and so on.
>Aquinas
who even reads scholastics nowadays
pseudo-intellectual pop culture analysis
This is actually a pretty good demonstration of women not knowing how to be funny, particularly when it comes to satire. As usual with women's jokes, the satire is bland and vague, unfocused and meandering, lacking punchlines, etc. But worse than that is how it shows they only know how to report on their own narrow, privileged perspective of the world, as women who are drowning in men trying to impress them.
How am I supposed to identify with that? A male comedian can explain something so specific to men that it's actually specific to male anatomy, and turn it into a joke a woman can laugh at. A woman can't even take something comparatively more universal (dating) and come up with good material. It just reads like cunty, bitter, spoiled, bratty whining about an extremely narrow experience. "Ughhhhh I hate those guys with a Porsche and they're always like 'my porsche' lmao" is not satire.
Women are so fucking boring. They can't do anything. They just suck ass. Women are literally proof God doesn't exist, because God wouldn't create something so fucking ugly, bland, limp, and boring. Only a blind uncaring evolutionary process could create an organism like women, which is really a subset of parasites.
most people are subhumans in general, not only women
>The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness
I bet you can't even get laid, you virgin. Virgins are just creeps who don't like women, they are really just virgins. In fact, they're so pathetic because they're virgins that they can't even get laid, which leads to them not getting laid, which results in virginity which is the cause of their lame ideas and hating women. And the punishment for being so lame? Virginity. The problem with virginity is virginity. Incels can't lose their virginity because they're virgins so they remain virgins. If they'd just stop being virgins they wouldn't be virgins.
Women are special deluxe subhumans with all the normal subhumanity of a man plus the extreme subhumanity of a woman. The average man is a "shitty human," the average woman is closer to being a mediocre plant.
What is a softboi and how is it different from basedboy?
Based and redpilled. Bravo sir
It doesn't help when your an unfuckable landwhale either.
Pic related, it's the author
Based.
Most atrocities known to us have been committed by men - from war to pedophiles to serial killers.
But yes, women are the scourge of the planet for being (admittedly) incredibly annoying.
There's nothing wrong with war and strife, it's a healthy part of humanity that we've been stripped of
>Based.
Is this the only word you brain dead fucks can say?
Thanks for posting this. I've wondered who makes these types of images and now everything makes sense
cringe
>cringe
is that Mark Kozelek?
>this fucking ogre has a healthy dating life
is it even possible to fail as a woman? can you shit right on the floor and men will still force interest in you?
I do :3
A softboy is a bit more pretentious and seemngly cultured. They are sort of a soiboy crossed with a hipster. And unlike soiboys, who tend to have a giddy, childlike aspect, softboys are moody and mellow, so as to give of an air of profundity where there is none.
>nothing wrong with war and strife
Countless young men, rushing to their death without knowing why or being fooled into it by the few.
I understand protecting your own. I understand the inherent violence that is necessary for society to survive (every law is backed by the thread of force), but war is glorified by those who've never been in it.
Granted, I'm not a veteran, but reading a lot of books by people who have survived it, I found few praising it. It's mass slaughter, and the worst horrors man can live through.
As for strife, it's inherent to life, and I agree that adversity strengthens when it doesn't outright break. But it's a leap from facing strife and strengthening yourself, and the nightmare of war.
>Women are literally proof God doesn't exist
love the word filters
>the one time the W*st produced something of worth
Unfortunately few, and fewer still are able to understand what they read
absolutely based. keep posting
By a man's standards, being able to reproduce, no. By a woman's standards, being able to get a man of comparable or above quality to provide for her, most women fail.
Read Homer
GOVERNMENT DISTRIBUTED CHADS WHEN
>By a woman's standards, being able to get a man of comparable or above quality to provide for her, most women fail.
Problem is most women vastly overestimate their quality, which is why you get a LOT of subpar women, thinking their equal is someone higher on the chain and shunning those of real, comparable quality.
That nigga on the right looks disturbingly like me, his glasses are different, I try harder to be clean shaven, and I don’t wear earrings but basically everything else is the same, the eye colour and skin tone; the black turtleneck, light grey trousers and brown belt; even his haircut is just like mine. And today I started reading the outsider for the first time
I’d guess that maybe I’m part of a stereotype but it looks so similar idk
They just reread In Search of Lost Time over and over again throughout their lifetime
Reading a book about a whyte man shooting an arab (The stranger by Camus)
Reading a book about a whyte man slaughtering womyn, making racist remarks and being a massive homophobe. (American psycho by Elis)
Yeah no.
I didn't say you have to like war, just that war is beneficial and healthy for your psychology and that of the collective at large. The conundrum ultimately reduces to: is it better to be a warrior yearning for peace and rest or a lifeless bugman yearning for strife and action? And I think one's life and paradise are considerably better than the other's.
Not you, you "softboi" yellowbelly.
>war is beneficial and healthy for your psychology and that of the collective at large
PTSD abounds among the people who've participated and "benefited" from war. And few return praising it.
For the nation itself, yes, it can bring about a deep sense of community, patriotism, social unity. Also there's the entertainment factor, and nothing grips the imagination like violence. Especially on a large scale.
I won't say war has no benefits, but I believe the cost outweighs them when you consider the casualties.
>is it better to be a warrior yearning for peace
I agree with this. I believe military service should be mandatory, since males have no rite of passage anymore. It would instill discipline, a sense of brotherhood/camaraderie, a deeper appreciation for your nation and, of course give you the skills necessary to fight which are paramount.
I understand and agree with defensive wars.But for each one, there is an attacker, which to me brings the moral atrocity of it into play.
War is still an nightmare overall. To those who fight it. To those left behind, and on the soul of nations it is a scar more than a medal. I understand it is necessary, and inevitable, that it is ingrained in our nature. But good?
Having said all that, my original reply was to which took a very aggressive stance on women as compared to men, when I see them as deeply annoying child-like beings on the whole but on the average, less capable of being monstrous than men.
> X: eX
>You decide to dump the current softboi of your affections. He is now your ex-softboi. “Finally,” you think to yourself, “Finally all that business with that softboi I was dating is over. Never again will I go near a man who quotes Socrates during sex.” Yet, I am sorry to say, once you have jumped down the rabbit hole of sleeping with a softboi, you will never turn back. You will find yourself unable to break the cycle, drawn as you are to this permanently-tired-looking, oversized-vintage-sweatshirt wearing type of human.
Kinda explains why she felt the need to come up with this article
How about we assign all the chads to landwhales and all the virgins to stacies?
It's a good book
>pedophilia is a healthy part of humanity we've been stripped of
taking edgelord incel to a new level
If you look like him you'd look better with a beard
best post I've seen all day desu
>we assign
You would need power to do that. Who has power, chads or incels?
This post reads like cunty, bitter, spoiled, bratty whining
have sex
The royal we. I am your king, bitch.
imagine being this brainwashed
you have to go back
“Red pill” drivel pol likes
Aristophanes' Assemblywomen.
V.S. Naipaul and Yukio Mishima
t. Softboi
Realistically? Mostly the betas and incels. The issue is that they're so weak they gave in to woman's whining and got cucked on civilization scale as a result.
Weak men controlling women is not sustainable in the long term it seems.
>muh violence
If you’re going to blame men for the negatives you must complement it with what good things men have done. Men have built everything and invented everything. Any material good you have should be thanked men for. Men laid the bricks, men protected the community, men grow the food
Women eternally btfo. How will they recover, if ever?
Soft bois are lefty homosexuals retard
They read mrs Obama’s book
Wow, liberals have finally started ripping on my love for American Psycho. Hilarious because I never had to use it for manipulation because that kind of knowledge came elsewhere. As for being soft, I could beat the shit out of any staff member at vice. Too bad for them I ended up losing my virginity to my gf, whom is also a virgin, and no longer as jaded. American Psycho is suppose to kill a good majority of those feelings because it sums up your state of mind. I wouldn't know what drivel a vice staff member reads.
Oh, you mean “s o ì boys”
Sofboys can also be you cornboys.
Glyphosate doesn’t care what political stripe you are.
100% seething
there's this weird idea that if you can reduce something down to a stereotype then that stereotype is somehow inherently, like, that person putting on an act or whatever but i think that's unfair esp with how reductive/dehumanizing it is. it reminds me of a slightly more grown up version of people making fun of kids shitty art on deviantart or whatever, like, yeah, it sucks, and it's kind of cringey but it's also sweet and i think the way to get good at stuff is to be bad at stuff for a while and i think there's a lot of joy in that
idk posts like these just put a really bad taste in my mouth. young dudes trying to figure their shit out isn't, like, inherently bad. you can wear beanies and like camus or even dfw or whatever and not be a bad person, and the idea that reducibility is a trademark of being a person is pointlessly mean/harsh and limits their growth b/c it limits their ability to experiment, or just sincerely be themselves. vulnerability shouldn't be embarrassing and a dude expressing softness or whatever shouldn't immediately be assumed to be some elaborate ploy to nut
like of course people like this exist, like, obviously they do but it just seems like a real slippery slope sort of thing
There's nothing wrong with Poe
>can you shit right on the floor and men will still force interest in you?
If you find a group of people with messing fetishes they will crawl all over themselves to fuck you.
What kind of hillibilly fox and grapes attitude is this? By no means is vice better than staring at blank paper but your oddly defensive post raises some concerns mate