Chart thread

Chart thread

Attached: 1564822713556.png (1351x1054, 437K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliography_of_King_Arthur
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Attached: 1563318186314.jpg (2896x2896, 692K)

>mogs your chart
Nothing personnel, father

Attached: A5983052-9FE8-4089-82A4-57FF6B608FC3.jpg (333x499, 24K)

that's a meme chart OP. I would know, I created it, even though I've only read 4 books off of that list.

not that I meant anything bad by it, I like the trivium and wish there was more people talking about it and building upon it. but it bothers me how it's been almost two years and hundreds of reposts later and yet almost nobody has bothered to rate it or critique it.

Attached: againstthemodernworld.jpg (333x499, 24K)

Anyone have a copy of creative and critical thinking?

the first edition critical & critical thinking by w. edgar moore is on libgen now thanks to a based user. in case you're wondering about the differences between the 1st and 2nd editions, hopefully this image will help.

Attached: 2nd edition.jpg (2240x2844, 1.69M)

bump

Attached: 2E17224F-16DB-4F00-BF2D-4113FD2FCF75.jpg (1500x2247, 1.04M)

Attached: 0.jpg (2000x3205, 1.13M)

>The Futurist Cookbook

What's wrong with pasta?

Cringe

Attached: 2017.jpg (4000x7700, 3.57M)

Attached: 1559732164847.jpg (1918x1434, 1.96M)

Which of those books have you actually read?

nice gets

how to read a book, critical and creative thinking, the new Oxford guide to writing, and the trivium by sister Miriam Joseph. I would trust Copi & Corbett for logic and rhetoric respectively, they’re pretty much definitive textbooks for their area. the books I’m most uncertain about are the grammar books and the second trivium book, which I only included since it was also a popular “trivium” book.

Attached: 1503631839659.jpg (720x2277, 661K)

Attached: 1494797662134.png (1660x2156, 3.14M)

Attached: 1503306655928.jpg (2700x2450, 1.76M)

Attached: 1503308252884.png (1246x1075, 1.93M)

Attached: 1503316062359.jpg (3240x3600, 997K)

Attached: 1503316134535.jpg (6100x3721, 2.82M)

Generally speaking pasta does not contain that much information and by its nature depend upon anons to regularly repost it for it to remain relevant. A book is much more reliable.

math pill

Attached: 1503411005812.png (4133x3331, 3.56M)

Attached: 1503410532669.png (1202x1856, 729K)

Attached: 1503769026693.jpg (3000x3868, 2.12M)

Attached: 1503845140317.png (1346x1268, 1.86M)

I should make the new version...someday...

Attached: 1555090039723.jpg (2000x1400, 631K)

Attached: 1555090363841.png (1211x1686, 893K)

Attached: 1555968046981.png (946x2017, 586K)

Attached: 1503605782040.jpg (2000x2820, 1.47M)

Attached: 1555097786589.jpg (1280x1200, 445K)

Attached: 1555193456011.jpg (2450x2750, 1.89M)

this shit better work

while i like this list, it fells a bit half-assed compared to

it’s me again
I didn’t create this chart but my posts inspired it

hate to be a fussy fuck but would really like a nicer version for kindle

Really enjoyed How to Read and A Mind for Numbers. When should the reference books be read?

>the bible

One of these things is not like the others

Is there a comprehensive flow chart for philosophy?

>blavatsky
cringe

King James Version is one of the least accurate bibles.

someone please post the young artists chart, i cant find

Attached: 1553650805636.png (768x777, 446K)

for

Attached: 1555193549588.jpg (2984x2347, 1.29M)

Attached: 1555193279301.jpg (3000x3312, 3.06M)

Why does this chart come up in every chart thread, yet I see no discussion around ecology?

> no Knausgård

Attached: 1503306544072.jpg (585x2300, 983K)

Attached: 1503410605465.png (720x2127, 1.61M)

The Castle twice? lol

Huh

cuz this is a thread for charts not ecology. make ur own ecology thread if u want to discuss ecology pussy

Attached: 105363.jpg (1440x2700, 3.28M)

Attached: 1558629044663.jpg (1724x3246, 1.49M)

Attached: 21328.jpg (1463x3448, 2.51M)

Does anyone have a historical fiction chart?

Black Company is so comfy

i’ve read a few too many of these
whoops

fucking retards always suggesting the kjv or nkjv
both of those are ass
niv is objectively better
t. learned attic greek to read koine

it's one of if not the most famous english version of the bible so whether its accurate or not it'll be recommended for the very many famous passages/influence it has

Attached: 1566321663722.jpg (1320x3000, 2.66M)

Since when do we have such high production quality? Can I use te Yea Forums editor?

brainlet here, this is much appreciated dude

>Christian sacred writings
>two Protestant bibles
Yeah, this list sucks

I needed this

The orange cover version of Trivium in these charts is heavily edited, buy the pic related one by Martino Fine Books instead (ISBN: 9781614276869).

Attached: trivium.jpg (585x851, 170K)

What is the difference? Could you go into more detail please?

seconded
don't really like miriams shit book so if this ones better i'm curious as well

>same person
self owned.

>Alice in wonderland on the pedo chart

Instantly discredited

There's rewriting and removed phrases. It omits the end of chapter questions present in the original. It also removes charts etc.
As it says in the cover, the 2002 reprint is edited by Marguerite McGlinn, it's not the original text.

no user, the author

Oh that seems pretty bad then. Good call.

Is there a chart for process philosophy?

>books about books

Because green earth propaganda is spammed all over the place in reality and thus now online. Other boards spam the same thread over and over about planting trees in deserts and such and ask anons about climate change constantly. It's all aimed to control mankind to get them to desire less, just a heavily veiled "be thankful" message.

Attached: YO DAWG.jpg (999x652, 108K)

How disturbing is Sotos? I have a bad stomach for sexual abuse as a subject matter but I'm curious nonetheless.

why dont they just teach this shit in school

Attached: 1565644087065.png (1000x4019, 2.95M)

Clit -> Niz (Monadology) -> Shell (System of Transcendental Idealism) -> Hegel (Phenomenology of Spirit & Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences) -> Nietzsche (The Will to Power) -> Bergson (Creative Evolution) -> Wh*tehead (Process and Reality) -> Deleuze (Difference and Repetiton)

>accuracy
KJV is central to the english tradition, fuck off

new/updated

Attached: 1566331387712.jpg (2712x5224, 3.65M)

requesting poetry ones

Requesting a hug and maybe a kiss from you

Is there one on eastern philosophy?

Dumping my collection, excuse the dumbass names

Attached: historyofsomthing.jpg (2520x2520, 910K)

Attached: rene guenon.png (6161x5009, 3.81M)

Attached: mexicanlit.jpg (1245x3673, 2.53M)

Attached: ericcarle.jpg (2203x1814, 541K)

Attached: legalphilosophy.jpg (736x613, 62K)

Attached: anarchy.jpg (2426x2676, 1.45M)

Attached: leftpropaganda.jpg (3440x3062, 1.95M)

Any charts on tulpamacy?

Attached: get woked.jpg (1024x800, 405K)

Attached: sadboi.jpg (720x935, 72K)

Attached: leninsbrain.jpg (621x5286, 997K)

Attached: PM.png (1100x1800, 1.9M)

Attached: saltpill.png (1920x1080, 1.36M)

Attached: melol.png (668x1876, 604K)

Attached: Christianthought.jpg (2000x7655, 3.65M)

Attached: feminism.jpg (1090x1389, 261K)

Attached: esoteric.jpg (960x1512, 218K)

Attached: africaandtheshithtatgoesdown.png (1037x900, 891K)

Attached: puritanism.png (1600x1437, 2.93M)

Goodnight lit, dont forget to brush your teeth before bed. :)

Attached: vapenash.png (1329x914, 807K)

could we see this in good quality?

Murakami Chart when?

Add the Decameron

The Bible is the single most important piece of literature in history, it's not even close. If you aren't familiar with it, you're going to be missing out on a lot when you read other stuff.

I read the wooden books Trivium, it's pretty decent for reference and a general overview/intro of core concepts. The additional non grammar, logic, rhetoric books thrown in are a nice touch too. Once I finish their Quadrivium I intend to loop back and delve deeper into the topics.

how the fuck can a book be aesthetic? are we talking just about covers or there's something more

>Graham
>meme book

natsoc fags are so fucking edgy, holy shit.

Which of these are genuinely "laugh-out-loud" funny?

Also:
>No Fear & Loathing

Cringe.

Does anyone have that chart on getting into Albert Camus?

>reading all that just to get into some gay metal band

no thanks

Just pick one of their most popular books and read it.

Messy reading list.

Attached: Reading_List_4.0_BOOKS_GALORE_finished.jpg (2000x1100, 719K)

request accepted

proof that
1) the people who make these charts haven't read the books they talk about
2) "intellectual" fascists are just confused edgy kids who were bullied in high school and think that mixing clowns like Marinetti with far eastern occultism is somehow a political ideology

back to the trash, where you belong

Attached: Poltard.png (592x546, 413K)

I didnt make this chart, but im pretty sure i inspired it/started the meme

How did you learn attic Greek?

He must be that faggot with the instagram meme page

Wow this is a bad list.

What's next, "Start with the Neandertals"?

A Popular History guide to History

>So you want to read Rene Guenon?
no

Catch-22 had me laughin

cringe

>behead all satans
cmon man

>rhetoric
Join Toastmasters and read the works of Cicero (Orator) and Churchill dealing with rhetoric specifically. You'll also learn more from watching YouTube videos of good speeches and than from text. But the most important part is getting rid of your fear of public speaking, which means, practice public speaking, which means, join Toastmasters.
>logic
Introduction to Logic, Copi. Logic is HARD, and a good textbook is essential. I failed my logic exam in uni, and I used a different book than the one they used to relearn and then I passed. I also had to memorize all inference rules which was a pain.
>grammar
Study Latin instead. In uni we used Collins' "A Primer of Ecclesiastical Latin" which is a good introduction. Keep in mind I learned Latin back in high school though.

Please don't be older than 14.

Any chart on critical theory?

Haven't seen this one before, thanks

I am very interested in rhetorics, thanks.

Shit chart

Thats not even national socialist
That looks closer to what an AW satan fag would post

cope

Cus its so good

Attached: Dark Chart 2.10 jpg.jpg (1724x3246, 1.67M)

Logician here, the problem with Copi is that it's an extremely bloated text, and after it was given the pearson textbook treatment it was even worse in that department. In my experience a lot of exposition in introducing logic makes it harder to follow.
For the first 250 pages of Copi he deals with informal logic, and since I expect a good chunk of people don't care about formal logic, Weston's Rulebook for Arguments (4th ed) is a nice lightweight basic text which teaches basic deductive arguments and wouldn't be out of place in a freshman comp class.
I was taught with Jeffrey's Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits (4th ed), which gets through everything you need as a phil undergrad in roughly 85 pages, and gives you something far stronger than the 500+ pages of Copi gives you. (The rest of Jeffrey teaches Godel and Turing, which folds into its hardcore sequel, and Computability and Logic). For something with a little bit more exposition, Quine's Elementary Logic is nice and lightweight. A more hardcore book after mastering that material is Sider's Logic for Philosophy. I wish I could recommend something that covers Natural Deduction but I only know of Mates' Elementary Logic, and I haven't read that one.

Attached: 1565719296745.jpg (3672x3024, 3.85M)

Attached: 1565719950861.png (1100x1100, 570K)

Is there one for nietzsche

>transcriptions of orations

god i hate this list so much

basically

I'm thinking about biting the bullet and 'Starting with the fucking Greeks.' I'm not completely unfamiliar with them, but it just seems like an inevitability.
Also, I might just become a NEET scholar and read through as many of these charts I can. I don't have much else going for me. Who knows, might come out of the other end as the greatest writer of the 21st century...... let me have this.

Attached: 1537301438382.jpg (1606x1102, 182K)

>Logician

Where did you/are you doing your PhD and where are places people get jobs? At the end of undergrad I was really thinking about getting a PhD in category theory or logic.

More sad charts if you guys have any

Attached: 1535639462124.jpg (640x1062, 210K)

Same guy, forgot to add I'm in burgerland. Although I know there's still some pure category theory done in Canada.

Attached: 1535639534095.png (1073x2357, 1.6M)

the memebooks are the best ones on the chart

Attached: 2B9BBD59-C64C-4AE3-A54E-73D3541F93CF.jpg (2048x1366, 526K)

Attached: 77676hHH-Q09-BFF48.png (1000x4019, 2.95M)

arigatou

>Epicureanism, hedonism for country life pleasures
fucking garbage chart in general

Is knowing the mythology really necessary for the philosophy part?

my own tolkien guide

Attached: 23783387_1358604404269408_1777753850424592314_o.jpg (1440x1331, 317K)

what's "the destruction of the christian tradition" about?

any of these for nonfiction ?

>
its pretty unfair to group pedophiles and hebephiles together. they're pretty different, user...

these book covers are shit, damn indians can't ever make good book covers, can't they?

Attached: thumb_286_47139.jpg (286x434, 41K)

the only thing disturbing about this is putting the title at the bottom.

Post your chin and jawline with a timestamp.

Attached: Dark Chart 2.10 jpg.jpg (1724x3246, 1.67M)

>litteraly says "be a slave lol! You believe in hierarchy dont you?"
I wait expectantly for the day in which You'll swing by the neck from a Tree branch.

Attached: burgerpunk_chart.png (1504x1202, 2.7M)

Attached: Christian Doctrine.jpg (2000x7655, 3.34M)

Is Plato en co really necessary to read fun myths and tragedies?

Attached: 1406914990397.jpg (2880x2016, 2.93M)

Damn, I'm "well-read" and "read a lot", but have only read like 1% of all this shit ITT.

is there a complete english translation of Complete Manual of Suicide? I only manage to find excerpts

Attached: SMART CASUAL.png (500x281, 151K)

Yea Forums all your entry level charts all say different things. Where do i actually start as a newcomer?

Greeks

even if i wanna delve more into literate fiction than philosophy at first?

Attached: Left_Wing.jpg (1200x1252, 470K)

BASED

don't listen to the memes. just read whatever the fuck you want. read the wiki, too.

I've read the wiki, and while i am currently reading whatever the fuck i want, i wanna be able to dive into reading thats a bit harder to digest over time. I do believe that in all arts there are great works and i would like to reach a level of understanding with literature so that id be able to appreciate them rather than become frustrated by them once i move to tackle them. Thats the logic behind me asking for a recommended entry point.

the frustration is inevitable, just do it (tm)

ty

pulled this off the wiki anyone got another or just erotica rec's in general?

Attached: Erotic_lit.jpg (2168x3332, 1.48M)

Seconding this request. Especially looking for short fiction.

growth of the soil would be a nice addition to that chart

Attached: Israeli.jpg (1920x1080, 422K)

Can anyone tell me if this version is any better?

pic related.

Attached: How to Fuck a Fag.jpg (734x1140, 109K)

Where can you find all these?

Midwit core

Is this because the cogsci of whatever guy on the left side turned out to be an adulteter

>a modest proposal
>dark and disturbing

Using humor and absurdism to bring real issues to light isn't dark and disturbing.

> George Soros
dropped

Just realised this chart is supposed to be a swastika. Holy fuck.

Everyone needs to begin somewhere.

Attached: FB_IMG_1561418650003.jpg (828x828, 54K)

the hell is this im interested

Imagine reading the Myth of Sisyphus and interpreting it as Pessimism

Literally none of these books teach you how to invest. It amazes me how little /biz/ knows, how little /biz/ acts on what it thinks it knows and how much authority /biz/ thinks it has on these subjects.

Literally 0% of these books in the image teach you how to invest. Holy fuck how that board triggers me

t. over 4+ years in finance

IS there a silk road chart?

Does anyone has a chart about voodoo fiction or similar? The one Im looking for included "Jumbee and other uncanny tales"

Anyone made a Dickens chart yet?

Attached: Hawkins.jpg (1600x1067, 330K)

>13688931

What 3 books/resources(or mix) would you recommend on for practical investing knowledge

I wanna learn pls

Attached: 1559518433180.png (1600x1600, 3.41M)

hansen and quinn
??? nope

are there more specific christian or islamic charts?
are there charts for practical things like gardening, farming, crafts, trades, etc?

Ive been meaning to put one together bc i havent seen one. I doubt ill make in time for this thread but as a general question to anyone, what would you want out of a poetry chart? Specific poems? Authors? Specific collections? Organized by region/language or movement? Etc.
Lmk so i can get to work

>imagine being this person.

Please don't follow it, that whole graph is a joke
The very first book in "brainlet" is a master's level textbook

Not a completely shit chart but if you don't read baby rudin as an undergrad you're a soft math major imo

Also what the fuck is Halmos doing in Brainlet? I swear every person wanting to get into math goes through the "if I learn the metaphysical underpinnings of maths then it'll all click in the end." That's a lot of rubbish, and you're better served just picking up Spivak and letting it slap you around a bit. Also Strang is garbage, add Axler for Linear algebra, calculus on manifolds , Dummit and Foote, as well as hatcher for alg top. The two stein books on the graduate level should also be moved to undergrad, I'd add Folland to the graduate analysis (honestly my favorite math book I've ever had to work out of).

Read whatever you want and if a chart catches your eye just try a few books on them. What I do.

What you recommend then?

Not him, but this one is considered to be the standard go-to text for trading.

Attached: Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets.jpg (400x529, 36K)

You actually reminded me to take down a cup. Thank you user.

>Lists Vargs books on paganism and The Secret of the She-Bear

Start with the Atlantians. That is, what the Egyptians had in their archives about Atlantis and the knowledge they gained from them and incorporated from their culture.

not as bad as one of those "start with the greeks" type troll charts but still very bad. bizarre uneven, undirected focus.

>tao's lecture notes are on there in undergrad? also baby rudin? also real and complex? why do the same material twice or 3x over? just do tao's lecture notes. rudin is dickishly austere with no point to it other than to prove you're a savant wunderkid to your retard classmates who you surround yourself to feel like a bigger man. see below.
> don't know any algebra so can't criticize, have heard good things about Algebra Chapter 0, Hatcher.
> you dont need two retard-tier linear algebra books, just one of them. then do some pointset topology, real analysis and maybe see a fourier transform once. then do functional analysis.
>literally no one but you has heard of the functional analysis book.
>literally no one has heard of that undergrad linear algebra book.
>inclusion of an entire book on fourier analysis, as a is bizarre.
>where is the probability theory?
>why SO MUCH geometry and manifolds??? to what end?
>cringe at learning french to read bourbaki.

this book by halmos is special. it's naive set theory. like demorgans laws and crap.

cringe at baby rudin comment. why learn basic material more painfully than necessary. the learning is in the exercises. there are gentler, more efficient books on that stuff, like bartle

on the same note there are also better books than rudin's real and complex . learning the basic material is not a dick measuring contest, youre supposed to learn it and then move on.

Attached: 9BD6F9FF-7740-4A6E-82DD-376633466CFB_zpsaaw2wtxk.jpg (936x1080, 325K)

where is computer science? where is statistics? where are graphs? where are games? where is higher number theory?

show us Yuri's now

Attached: e9aa3b4ec125310dc474ae71d03759e0256cf591b9c03bbf955a702e27d70166.png (2560x2739, 2.79M)

Attached: ce4e278a435f2d38a4571bec840974567d13c2b325d93b022aa26ca5b808b288.jpg (1791x4145, 3.09M)

Trading and investing are two entirely different concepts

I'm reading this one, not much has changed, they highlight what has been updated in the preface

Attached: 1558361233787.png (1296x803, 544K)

What interests me about charts on Yea Forums versus other boards is that ours are always systematized as if to feign the aesthetic commitments underlying them, whereas Yea Forums or Yea Forums are very explicit about their tastes (as opposed to pretending to have a model or a definitive flowchart to follow). this truly is a board of plebian idealists rather than bold aesthetes. the closest we come to real charts are the bold poetry ones that end in “mama’s proud-tier”

Attached: 1558359918333.png (1400x739, 1.05M)

anyone have a nietzsche guide

Robin Pierson’s podcast is loads better than History of Rome. He goes in-depth into not just the narrative, but also macrohistory and historiography at large. Also does a much better job answering a lot of viewer questions, most of which are interesting. The only thing that’s peeved me about him is that he once put a main narrative episode behind a paywall instead of a bonus one, but it’s whatever. Also, this chart is shit since it suggests the podcast but makes no mention of the numerous works that Pierson cites and recommends in making his podcast. Playing Total War games to learn about Byzantium? What a fucking meme chart lmfao.

pseud alert

Attached: 1558359273531.png (1094x768, 1.26M)

Attached: 1558356840421.png (880x1445, 749K)

good if you ignore everything besides the bottom row

Take a course, read the textbooks, follow the news. You're not going to learn the mathematics of investment or learn your way around the programs from a pop business book.

How is Solaris compared to the movie?

I have this one. I haven't started with him though, so I have no insight in this chart.

Attached: 1562927252353.jpg (1452x1348, 596K)

/his/ is kind of shit. Really too bad that it's supposed to be the philosophy board.

Attached: 1556541147153.png (2000x2177, 2.72M)

Because if you can't deal with the terseness of baby rudin at some point in your undergrad education then you really don't have an idea of what classical analysis is at all. Rudin's exercises are probably the best part of the book desu, not overly bloated, each one points you in the direction of a real application of the material you've learned, etc. If it's too difficult at first there's no shortage of 'softer' analysis books to make the transition easier ('yet another introduction to analysis' and spivak's 'calculus' both come to mind). But yeah, rudin or bust, I'll admit its somewhat a rite of passage but if you can do the first 8 chapters of that book you can pick up virtually any book on measure theory or functional analysis and keep up at some level

>podcasts
>”pseud”
right back at you champ

Catch-22 had me laugh out loud more than a few times

Monika is still best girl

Attached: yuri.jpg (1600x1600, 2.18M)

>those nines
>that subject
[insert Cirno calling baka here]

Any of you lads got an Arthurian charts?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliography_of_King_Arthur

Scan this article and be surprised by the book references.

I personally like TA Barron.

Has anyone read "Work and Days/Theogony"? If you have, how was it?

Attached: 1558131818035.jpg (3068x1536, 1.79M)

Attached: JUST.jpg (1656x1304, 330K)

why make things hard at the beginning when they could be easy?

saying rudin is a rite of passage seems pointlessly pretentious and outdated.

any resource to make these charts or is it just a job for paint?

paint or inkscape

or gimp

At my undergrad we used Johnsonbaugh and Pfaffenburger (Dover). Like all Dover math books I used it was cheaper and arguably superior to the meme standard.

Honestly the only real meme books I've heard are used essentially everywhere are Lang and Hatcher. I can see why one would use Lang over Jacobson since the latter has a lot of focus on the early applications of algebra, but Hatcher kind of scared me away from topology, his writing drove me insane.

Dang, you anons know a lot about math books! I got my minor in math and I never even bought the books, much less read any of them. They're like a hundred bucks each!

Read in chronological order

Because at some point any maths person is going to have to pour through a particularly dense and unyielding book in order to gain any level of understanding of the topic. God knows I've seen enough students take a class that uses Ross and be completely unprepared for any kind of graduate level material.


not familiar with this one but it is disgusting how expensive rudin is nowadays
Too many analysis books do away with topological arguments all together (or they kind of lightly skim them by vaguely mentioning a metric space and some unsatisfying definition of compact) and push right on along because you don't "need" overly intense topological arguments to do stuff like construct derivatives, take riemann limits, etc. (which is essentially all an introductory analysis class is supposed to take you as far as).

However, if you want to to have any sort of deeper understanding of analysis, be it Borel algebras, various types of tych spaces, all those subtle compactification theorems involved in functional analysis, Lp spaces and the like, you're going to need the machinery you get in chapter two of rudin in those brutal 10 or say pages.

I do like that Rudin approaches from metric spaces, J&P did a nice job with them but that came later in the course.

J&P is also weird in that is starts with the algebraic definition of the reals, and later when limits are dealt with has you prove the construction with Cauchy sequences, it never mentions Dedekind cuts.

I will say the construction using Cauchy sequences is so much more intuitive and actually useful than the Dedekind nonsense that only is comes up again if you take some sort of constructivist class on formal logic or set theory. Thinking of real numbers as equivalence classes of similarly convergent Cauchy sequences is useful in that it also gives your head some kind of immediate justification of silly facts like why 0.99999... is equal to 1.


Also Cauchy sequences are everywhere in the literature and it makes sense to be familiar with them from the get go. The appendix to chapter one in rudin may be the most obligatory part of the book, but you do get to do the cauchy sequence construction in the exercises

Also Hatcher is one of those books that's impossible to navigate through without having lecture notes guiding you along the way. Look up some class online that teaches using the book and then look up each topic in the appropriate section. Hatcher honestly is excellent but difficult to get a grip on if you don't already know some Alg. Top.

wrong

natsuki?

I only have one for Sayori left. Sorry, fren.

Attached: sayori.jpg (1600x1600, 676K)

>sayori being literate
funny

here you go, chum! i just reverse image searched the image the other dude posted and lo and behold, i found this crisp, high definition version (:

Attached: 1438090781211.png (3000x2500, 1.47M)

Funny how most of those women were Jewish or affiliated with Jews. You guys shoot yourself in the foot there.

Blah blah blah...

>Take a course
Don't do this.
>follow the news
Definitely don't do this.
garbage

Ah you're genuinely being kind. Dankeschöne

"I want a list of feminists"
"But they're all Jews!"
"Well, what do you know!"

I'm in a masters for something non-math rn, I'm sure Hatcher is useful, I'm also just not a very visual/geometric person. One grad student who was the local category theory wiz showed me J.P. May's book for algebraic topology, I felt like I might have had more success understanding that.

International politics one is lacking. Waltz’ Theory of Int’l Politics is far more canon than MSW. I’d probably swap the two and also kick out Kissinger for Rob Gilpin.

>juan rulfo
Octavio Paz, Salvador Elizondo and Elena Garro ar the real god tiers

Anybody got a Survivalist/Bushcraft reading list?

There's no Western (genre) section in the sticky, is there any kind of chart for it? If not, would anyone want me to cobble one together?

Hey, there's actually stuff on this I'm not familiar with. Neat.

Being broadly well-read is a fantasy. Tens of thousands of books come out every year across hundreds of nations, many of which went out of print before you were born or will never be available in a language you understand. Just get what you can while you're still alive and enjoy the ride.

/out/ and /an/ both have great, massive guides, but /out/'s is more comprehensive and covers more subjects. Check it Read the /out/ sticky.

Anyone have a chart for Camus?

munkres is also a universal and a meme

that's really cool that you learned from dover books, i'm jealous

Is there any chart on Alexander and Diadochi?

last one should be "all gall is divided" by emile cioran

> (You)
>Ive been meaning to put one together bc i havent seen one. I doubt ill make in time for this thread but as a general question to anyone, what would you want out of a poetry chart? Specific poems? Authors? Specific collections? Organized by region/language or movement? Etc.
i would love to see specific collections with authors, which are worth reading

>chomsky's manufacturing consent instead of parenti's inventing reality
cringe

why is animal farm centrist?
cause its an allegory of going from one extreme party control to another?

acquiring textbooks is not that hard. There's photocopy places everywhere around every uni that will sell you photocopy printed and spiral bound copies of all text books at the uni, or worse case you bring a .pdf and print one out and they bind it for you.

if you cant find pdfs well you need more friends then, especially arabs, they all share everything its great.

Cool chart.

Thanks all of you for posting

Are those charts based on Doki's preferences in books?

Someone should make a religion/anthropology/myth reading list, containing things stuff like Frazer, Bataille, Mauss, Guenon, Evola, Schuon, etc.

I'm currently reading about bataille and the traditionalists so that's why I mentioned these, but would love to read all kinds of perspectives on these topics

Bruh.

>imagine r9k retards actually reading zarathustra

Attached: 32f.jpg (251x242, 10K)

I didn't make it. I've only read half of them. And honestly I don't plan to ever read State of Fear or finish Atlas Shrugged.

Too late now. Also really, businesses just blatantly violate copyright for you?

Meant

Attached: 1534352967056.jpg (4000x3549, 1000K)

Is there a chart for how to improve your own creative writing? I looked at the website, and there were incessant charts and most of them were labeled by type of fiction - not how you can improve your own work instead.

they absolutey can and will near a college - that's half of how they stay open. Not every Kinkos has incompetent local small business clients to keep them open.

You toss them shit and they'll stay open forever

I haven't seen one. This might help though. Name brand places even? Where mutt lawyers at?

Attached: 1534685565677.jpg (1728x4608, 2.05M)

Thanks, but, that chart is more about the process of thinking/using books and how to read, not the "workbooks" of the craft as it were.


As for law, they're more going to go after people copying medical records/institutional copyright violations vs. some kids with textbooks.

Because the people who post that chart are belligerent imbeciles with a vague environmentalist sentiment that they feel very strongly, they have little knowledge of the science, practice or philosophy of ecology, and know little about their home itself. Not to mention all the baggage that typically comes with being a chartfag.

Looking into the world of creative writing guidelines, tips, or tricks, you will quickly realize that most people who write about it are talking out of their asses or mindlessly regurgitating advice of dubious quality they got from somewhere else. They are not useful for anything except the most basic basics and in some cases may harm your writing or vampirize your passion. I speak from recent personal experience with this. However, I do have some suggestions:

>Steering the Craft (2015 ed.) - Ursula K LeGuin
Fine for basics. Doesn't waste time waffling about her personal life in a pseudo-memoir like some other introductory writing texts.
>Portable MFA for Creative Writing - New York Writers Workshop
Solid text for a more experienced writer and covers a variety of subjects (poetry, memoir, fiction, nonfiction, etc.).
>The Poetry Home Repair Manual - Ted Kooser
Written by a US Poet Laureate. Worth reading even if you're not going into poetry, IMO.
>Now Write! - ed. Sherry Ellis
Writing exercises. There are also versions of this specializing in genre fiction and nonfiction, but I have not read those myself and cannot attest to their quality.
>What Editors Do - ed. Peter Ginna
For if/when you want to start submitting shit to publishers or if you want to get a rough idea of how the publishing world works.

It's not a hundred book bonanza like some of these charts, but those should be plenty to work with for now. You can also find free video lectures or lecture notes from university MFA programs in various places online. GLHF.

Attached: 1561232294809.jpg (2950x3906, 1012K)

add silent spring

can confirm this list is shit
you chose the Christianized version of the tanach for judaism instead of using artscroll or literally any other orthodox publication

You don't go after the kids. You'd go after that fat UPS/kinkos money. Send a few young looking interns to get some copies around the country, especially in the district you want it tried. You could maybe do a suit per publisher even. Just leaving money on the table.

It still would’ve sucked.

>the 'pedo' stuff
>someone honestly deleted the charts
Wow. Just wow.

Attached: 1566271593245.jpg (1918x1434, 1.96M)

I am literally shaking.

Attached: 1566271505227.jpg (4000x7700, 3.57M)

Shit's depressing. I'm like half way through Tech Slavery and there aren't really any solutions other than revolt, and him holding back from straight out saying violence.

>holding back from saying violence
Lol "it's call to violence shut it DOWN". So much for freedom of speech.

I'm no Nazi but the Nazi shit got pruned here for the same faggot reason along with the loli stuff. If you can't even SAY rebellion and get away with it you won't do shit.

The only thing that should have been pruned is the green earth shit. It's fake. A disingenuous mind game meant to make you be thankful of 5v of electric and other conservative mind games.

>cane
based

Nabokov and Marquez are so based.

>someone who managed to make $1 billion off of the eternal anglo doesn't have good advice because conservative meme
This is why you will never succeed in life

If you haven't read the Castle twice you're a fuckin pleb lmao

>Mein Kampf
>Nazism
>on the same list as Lenin, Marx, and Stalin
This is the worst list in this thread

These lists might be good but they don't have nice pictures on them to make my eyes feel good and release happy chemical in my brain so I won't read them

>a book Donald Trump had someone write for him
>equivalent to DFW and Pynchon
Spotted the retard

No nazbol user? But Anarchocommunfascistmonarchy is a completely serious political philosophy.

Hidden in the middle it says, "the left can't meme"

Attached: 1546761025608.png (952x2358, 1.27M)

I guarantee that I know more about finance than you ever will since I take courses about finance at an accredited university

>Lol "it's call to violence shut it DOWN"
Generally, people in power don't support calls for violent revolution. Can you guess why?

No actually, considering people in power made over nine-thousand nukes when it only takes a couple to stop a war.

But no, I'm not naive, I know how advertising agencies are with faux smiles and the implications surrounding such things.

Attached: 3a421a59cbeb385eeebf7b503da710ad.jpg (320x240, 40K)

Pope's works are beautiful but I don't think it's the best for a first read.

Thank you user - it seems I'll add these to the list I'll add the only ones that are kind of useful are the james Scott bell ones, and they're always juuuuuust too thin to be useful in terms of content

People don't need to go to school to learn you faggot, they merely do it to seem reputable but that doesn't apply here. Do we look like your employer?

Imagine having to explain to people that you're reading a book called "babyfucker" lmao

>someone save your shitty charts

Attached: 1561813838489.png (365x335, 63K)

as long as its some privately owned printing/photocopy place then yeah for sure, especially in downtowns of larger cities since theyre 9/10 times run by some old arab or a asian couple that don't give a fuck.

Only time i ever ran into trouble printing a pdf textbook was at staples lmao

weeb game, Yea Forums and weeb HS girls, on a weeb board and the Yea Forums one at that

cant say im too surprised people will save them even if theyre just memes

even i did a few threads ago

>I guarantee that I know more about finance than you ever will since I take courses about finance at an accredited university
I am a finance graduate lol. You don't learn how to trade or invest at uni.