The final boss of Yea Forums: 25 Mistakes that Peg You as an Amateur Writer

youtube.com/watch?v=ZPHjb0MqX9g

She seems to scare the shit out of all of you. Yea Forums has finally met its match. She would rip you all to pieces with your flaws, failures to meet publication standards and literary convention. You are puny to her. And you just can't measure up.

How do I know? She was my editor once. And I still haven't recovered for how thoroughly she ripped apart my ms.

x. She likes very few books, maybe one out of a hundred fifty clients.
x. She has personally placed those books with the big five and let them through for meeting her impossible standards.
x. Her schedule is completely packed. If she reads your book and trashes it, she's doing you a huge favor.
x. Her standards are so high editors and publishers fight to be the first to hear about her best clients.
x. She is a stone cold soulless psychopath who will see you as dirt unless you meet standards and conventions of the publishing world.
x. She is right. About everything. Although her notes castrated me, they fixed everything in my book. I even should give her a cowriting credit. But I'd rather not risk offending master by messaging her at all after the pegging I took.

Attached: file.png (1280x720, 1.79M)

isn't it incedible how capitalism works?
the industry used to rely on the whims of writers. now they've got a singularly empowered and informed consultant who can funnel them marketable books without any confusion.
death to the writer, truly

>W-r-i-t-e l-i-k-e a m-a-c-h-i-n-e

No thanks, I'll savor my flaws

Attached: THISBITCH.jpg (540x960, 46K)

What qualifies her to give this advice? Though to be fair, I've watched as far as 5 and so far they're all so obvious that you're not just an amateur writer if you make these mistakes, you're also stupid. The first mistake is spelling characters' names consistently, for crying out loud.

When does the pegging start?

>actually watch video
>it's pretty standard advice; nohing controversial or political
this is fine. why are we made about this?

Also, good writers aren't good because they're checking mistakes off a list, they're good because they read and write enough to naturally avoid these mistakes. If you give your book to an editor and they're asking you to make major changes, you haven't been reading enough.

put it on 2x and transcribed this shit

1. different spellings for the same words
2. too similar character names
3. mistakes in professions' procedures
4. mistakes in details of medicine, technology, etc
5. small talk in dialogue that doesn't add anything
6. forgetting to include sensory information
7. naming the main character after yourself
8. overuse of cliches, especially on the first page
9. overuse of the same sentence construction
10. switched between past and present tense unintentionally
11. pausing the story every time a character is introduced to give a lot of physical descriptions
12. overuse of alternative dialog tags
13. using more than one adjective to describe a noun
14. using more words than is necessary
15. thesaurus writing
16. constantly repeating the character's name
17. constantly repeating characters's names in dialog
18. constantly repeating the same descriptions
19. switch the point of view character at random
20. including mundane details for no reason
21. describing every article of clothing every character wears
22. using an adverb + a verb instead of just a stronger verb
23. overly formal dialog
24. introducing too many characters at the same time
25. writing stage direction instead of action

pretty basic advise

dostoevsky btfo

This

>naming the main character after yourself
>in erotic car crash fiction
No wonder CHROMIUM man freaked out the test reviewers

Attached: Crash.jpg (677x1031, 51K)

holy fucking trite advice batman

How about I rip her panties to pieces then choke fuck the fucking shit out of her whilst fucking her pussy.

>woman giving me advice

It reads like an idea of a hairstylists idea to make a book read pretty.

>tfw no 4/10 editor gf

It's advice aimed at female wannabes doing YA. Imagine what she has to read?

a 4/10 pale-skinned redhead is a 7/10

>H-hello, what's wrong with your melanoma?

Shes really cute desu. Where is user living to consider her "below average?"

6 or 7 is a very conservative pick. Imo the baseline for redhead qts is a high 6.

>freelance editor
>no notible published works
>shit taste of pop sjw core books

No thanks, cunt.

What an absolute goblin.

this. 4/10 is generous.

>1:05
>"The good side or the bad side"
pic related
are you sure you aren't just shit at writing user?

Attached: vomit pepe.jpg (399x209, 12K)

>Naming the main character after yourself
Caesar BTFO

Attached: 4109SHt54aL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (324x499, 23K)

Looks like a butterface but maybe she got nice feets

hey, thats the picture from the no more brother wars

>2. too similar character names
Better hide that copy of one hundred years of solitude then

What do you expect from booktube? They all obviously view literature as mere fashion which is why all these channels are so "lifestyle-ish".

>22. using an adverb + a verb instead of just a stronger verb
JK rowling btfo (unironically)
>14. using more words than is necessary
proust btfo
>8. overuse of cliches, especially on the first page
karl marx btfo

So this chick stamped on your balls because you write godawful genre fiction and you're trying to project that on everyone else as if you're some badass in order to regain self-respect as a man of worth instead of facing your reflection as a massive failure in a small pond where even the big fish are betas? Weird fetish.

He’s probably seen anons writing

Attached: 1379823475883.jpg (504x470, 97K)

>empowered and informed
fitter, happier

Some time ago I made a thread about this video. I asked if real editors give such entry level advices or she's doing it because of the youtube audience.
I'm not joking, I learned about it in grade five and I'm from a third world shithole that send people to top tier universities without teaching them how to use semicolons.