She seems to scare the shit out of all of you. Yea Forums has finally met its match. She would rip you all to pieces with your flaws, failures to meet publication standards and literary convention. You are puny to her. And you just can't measure up.
How do I know? She was my editor once. And I still haven't recovered for how thoroughly she ripped apart my ms.
x. She likes very few books, maybe one out of a hundred fifty clients. x. She has personally placed those books with the big five and let them through for meeting her impossible standards. x. Her schedule is completely packed. If she reads your book and trashes it, she's doing you a huge favor. x. Her standards are so high editors and publishers fight to be the first to hear about her best clients. x. She is a stone cold soulless psychopath who will see you as dirt unless you meet standards and conventions of the publishing world. x. She is right. About everything. Although her notes castrated me, they fixed everything in my book. I even should give her a cowriting credit. But I'd rather not risk offending master by messaging her at all after the pegging I took.
isn't it incedible how capitalism works? the industry used to rely on the whims of writers. now they've got a singularly empowered and informed consultant who can funnel them marketable books without any confusion. death to the writer, truly
What qualifies her to give this advice? Though to be fair, I've watched as far as 5 and so far they're all so obvious that you're not just an amateur writer if you make these mistakes, you're also stupid. The first mistake is spelling characters' names consistently, for crying out loud.
Colton Brooks
When does the pegging start?
Julian Martinez
>actually watch video >it's pretty standard advice; nohing controversial or political this is fine. why are we made about this?
Connor Brooks
Also, good writers aren't good because they're checking mistakes off a list, they're good because they read and write enough to naturally avoid these mistakes. If you give your book to an editor and they're asking you to make major changes, you haven't been reading enough.
Luis Collins
put it on 2x and transcribed this shit
1. different spellings for the same words 2. too similar character names 3. mistakes in professions' procedures 4. mistakes in details of medicine, technology, etc 5. small talk in dialogue that doesn't add anything 6. forgetting to include sensory information 7. naming the main character after yourself 8. overuse of cliches, especially on the first page 9. overuse of the same sentence construction 10. switched between past and present tense unintentionally 11. pausing the story every time a character is introduced to give a lot of physical descriptions 12. overuse of alternative dialog tags 13. using more than one adjective to describe a noun 14. using more words than is necessary 15. thesaurus writing 16. constantly repeating the character's name 17. constantly repeating characters's names in dialog 18. constantly repeating the same descriptions 19. switch the point of view character at random 20. including mundane details for no reason 21. describing every article of clothing every character wears 22. using an adverb + a verb instead of just a stronger verb 23. overly formal dialog 24. introducing too many characters at the same time 25. writing stage direction instead of action
pretty basic advise
Nolan Torres
dostoevsky btfo
Jace James
This
Juan Williams
>naming the main character after yourself >in erotic car crash fiction No wonder CHROMIUM man freaked out the test reviewers
Looks like a butterface but maybe she got nice feets
Hunter Ross
hey, thats the picture from the no more brother wars
Joshua Gray
>2. too similar character names Better hide that copy of one hundred years of solitude then
Leo Foster
What do you expect from booktube? They all obviously view literature as mere fashion which is why all these channels are so "lifestyle-ish".
Nathan Long
>22. using an adverb + a verb instead of just a stronger verb JK rowling btfo (unironically) >14. using more words than is necessary proust btfo >8. overuse of cliches, especially on the first page karl marx btfo
Xavier Cook
So this chick stamped on your balls because you write godawful genre fiction and you're trying to project that on everyone else as if you're some badass in order to regain self-respect as a man of worth instead of facing your reflection as a massive failure in a small pond where even the big fish are betas? Weird fetish.
Some time ago I made a thread about this video. I asked if real editors give such entry level advices or she's doing it because of the youtube audience. I'm not joking, I learned about it in grade five and I'm from a third world shithole that send people to top tier universities without teaching them how to use semicolons.