Post what you're currently reading and what you're going to be reading next :3

Post what you're currently reading and what you're going to be reading next :3

Currently:

Witelo - Perspectivae (Books I and V)
Clive Granger and Michio Hatanaka - Spectral Analysis of Economic Time-Series
Nicole Oresme - Tractatus de configurationibus qualitatum et motuum
Adam Smith - The Theory of Moral Sentiments
Aristotle - Prior Analytics

After:
Roger Bacon - Opus Majus
Oskar Morgenstern and Gerald L. Thompson - Mathematical Theory of Expanding and Contracting Economies
Nicole Oresme - On Seeing the Stars
Jeremy Bentham - A Defence of Usury
Aristotle - Posterior Analytics

Got a lot of mathematical (non-qualitative stuff) coming up so wish me luck.

Attached: 9780872200647.jpg (265x400, 7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

goodreads.com/user/show/27498265-tyler
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>so wish me luck.
I'm thinking you can go fuck yourself, tranny. Dilate

Holy shit, butterhurt much?

Cringe and kys

>It's a tranny blogs about all the books he purchased and won't read
Fuck off

Attached: amateur.jpg (1024x512, 41K)

How is any of this cringe? This gets legitimate respect no matter what kind of field you are delving into. :3

Trying to build a culture in philsophy by reading phil books and commenting them. For now I have just started withthe few phil books in my family's library, next I'll start re-reading whatever philosophy I've read in my earlier years, and then I will move on to buy new books depending on what I need.

>currently
Habermas, Discourse on Philosophical Modernity
Bachelard, Poetic of Space
Bachelard, Water and Dreams
Jankélévitch, Adventure, bordeom, seriousness
Lawrence Durrell, Justine
>next
Lawrence Durrell, Balthazar, Montolive, Cléa
Plato -Dialogues
Descartes - Discourse on method
Kant - Critiques (all three of them)
Simmel -Philosophy of Money
Deleuze - Difference and repetition
Brentano - Origin of Moral Knowledge, Doctrine of Correct Judgement, Psychology from the Empirical Standpoint
Douady - Algebra and Galoisian Theories, but only if I have time
The Bhagavad Gita

Then we'll see.

I could never just solely read philosophy. Not when there are so many scientific and sociological properties of reality to study.

However it does occupy a decent portion of my time, as you can see :3

hey :3, good luck!

Currently: David Gordon's take down of the analytical Marxists and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep.

Next: Carlyle on Hero Worship, Edward Feser's book on Aquinas, and I've been meaning to check out some Zizek (recommendations on where to start welcome).

Thanks.

Here is my Goodreads if anyone wants to add me or follow my reviews

goodreads.com/user/show/27498265-tyler

Currently reading:

The Constitution of the Athenians
Against Nature
How to Be Your Dog's Best Friend

The only thing I'm looking forward to reading is Aristotle's Revenge by Edward Feser. I just got it in the mail and it looks really good.

not sure if your taste in literature is patrician or just boring

Feser is awesome, his blog is pretty dope too. I remember he had a pretty good take down of Hume's fork on there.

Well for starters I'm not trying to be patrician, so to the untrained eye it's 'boring'.

Simply put, however, I take a scientific view towards social philosophy and moral philosophy, and obviously economics, so that the things that I read are extremely cut and dry.

I get the color I need out of life, interacting with people etc etc. I don't need anymore color here. I need information and data to compile and analyze. It's how I am at this point. I've always had mathematics as the first thing I read though.

This is the first time I've finished as many books as I have though without any replacements. Three books are in the mail so I'm reading two books right now. If nothing comes in the mail tomorrow I'm reading just Smith and Aristotle.

Some of these books also cost a lot of money, so it's definitely patrician. Witelo's Perspectivae Liber Primus cost me $300. :3

>currently
Logic Matters, P.T. Geach
On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle, Franz Brentano
Z zagadnień logiki i filozofii, Jan Ɫukasiewicz
Intention, G.E.M. Anscombe
After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre
Ancient Formal Logic, J.M. Bocheński
Papers in Logic and Ethics, A.N. Prior

>next
De regno, Thomas Aquinas
Non-existent Objects, Terence Parsons
Essays of a Catholic, Hilaire Belloc
Meinongian Logic, Dale Jacquette
The Quantum Enigma, Wolfgang Smith

>Roger Bacon and Aristotle
Nice

Brentano gang. That Galois theory book looks interesting as well.

Feser's Aquinas book is a really good summary of his main lines of thought. Have fun user!

>reading more than one book at a time

Attached: 1549054069549.jpg (414x536, 29K)

>greentexting things I do with reaction images

;3

Are you the guy who shilled Alhazen for months?

The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch. Boy this kid can write. I'm blowing through it like a comic book

>communicating with an identityfag
let this thread die

Based post. Very refreshing to see some unique books not posted here often.
I have been wanting to read Wolfgang Smith. Have you read any of his works before the Qauntum Enigma or are you starting there?

Thanks user. I've read some of his articles in Sophia journal, and also his longer piece on Stephen Hawking, but Quantum Enigma is the first of his books that I've read.

Currently:
Hitchens - God is Not Great
Huysmans - Against Nature
(forgot author) - The First Philosophers

After:
Not sure. Maybe the very short introducing to Hume.

Valencia, gore capitalism

---

Autonomia something-something (a book)
Tiqqun #1
Two books on The Book of Kells (I've read both all the way through before and I'm going to re-read.

Jesus the Christ- Talmage
Empire of Liberty- Wood
American Psycho, just finished this week

Next
Blood meridian
The Warmth of Other Suns
What hath god wrought

>Current
Herodotus's Histories
Faulkner's The Sound and the Fury
José Goytisolo's El erial y sus islas (an essay anthology)

>Next
Fernando del Paso's José Trigo
Pindar's Odes

Currently:
Schopenhauer- The World as Will and Presentation I & II

Whitehead - Process and Reality

After:
Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz (Rationalists) and of Locke, Berkeley and Hume (Empiricists). Mainly their essential works so some of these would be rather short.

Then...Kant all three critiques.

Attached: 540178AD-30FD-45C8-A9D3-5660849F4978.jpg (454x676, 53K)

Juan Goytisolo*

Why are you reading Whitehead before the thinkers he directly comments and builds upon.