how do atheists reconcile with Pascal's wager?
How do atheists reconcile with Pascal's wager?
Dominic Diaz
Other urls found in this thread:
discord.gg
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Jason Taylor
They can't. They just cope with it.
Jonathan Foster
Grandstand about God being mean and so therefore not worthy of them
Lincoln Adams
I have a bridge to sell you
Julian Thomas
same way they did the last 50000 times you created this stupid fucking thread
Jason Gonzalez
This.
Adrian Rodriguez
Why? What does he say?
Ayden Sullivan
So... they couldn't?
Jose Fisher
read the Pensées and find out
Kayden Bailey
Pascal's wager is an argument in philosophy presented by the seventeenth-century French philosopher, mathematician and physicist, Blaise Pascal (1623–1662).[1] It posits that humans bet with their lives that God either exists or does not.
Pascal argues that a rational person should live as though God exists and seek to believe in God. If God does not actually exist, such a person will have only a finite loss (some pleasures, luxury, etc.), whereas he stands to receive infinite gains (as represented by eternity in Heaven) and avoid infinite losses (eternity in Hell).[2]
Pascal's Wager was based on the idea of the Christian God, though similar arguments have occurred in other religious traditions. The original wager was set out in section 233 of Pascal's posthumously published Pensées ("Thoughts"). These previously unpublished notes were assembled to form an incomplete treatise on Christian apologetics.
Historically, Pascal's wager was groundbreaking because it charted new territory in probability theory,[3] marked the first formal use of decision theory, and anticipated future philosophies such as existentialism, pragmatism and voluntarism.[4]