Should I just go into it with no prior introduction?
Should I just go into it with no prior introduction?
Nathaniel Scott
Other urls found in this thread:
Alexander Hernandez
Yes.
Wyatt Diaz
No.
Michael Hall
I don't know.
Leo Reyes
I don't know.
Tyler Baker
No.
Benjamin Nelson
l don't know.
Juan Perez
Why not.
Brayden Hill
Parker Lee
Isaiah Murphy
The absolute state of this board...
Austin Robinson
Marvelous
Blake Garcia
Negatory
Nicholas Brown
nah bro just watch this instead
youtube.com
Isaiah Martinez
Yes.
Noah Martinez
I am a rationalist.
Will I gain anything from reading Hegel?
Connor Young
You should read Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy prior to it, and read his Enyclopedia along with the Phenomenology.
Adrian Carter
If you already have it in you’re possession give it a shot!
Realistically, even if you have read most major texts in the canon and have read a bunch of secondary lit on Hegel you are still going to have to struggle against the text so maybe just jump into it and give it a shot. If you encounter a paragraph you really can’t make sense of find the corresponding Half-Hour Hegel video or look it up in Hegel’s Ladder.
Asher Ross
Yes.
Eli Garcia
Patrician, if not his entire lectures then at least the introductory parts
Julian Nguyen
Well good, then I'll read it. I'll take a shot at Kant first though.
Josiah Sullivan
>Dialectical idealism
cringe
Elijah Johnson
In a way Hegel is the greatest rationalist of all time. His famous slogan to sum up his thought is ‘what is real is rational and what is rational is real’. He means that the structure of human understanding and the structure of the world are not just compatible but identical. Hegel is the high point in confidence in the rational mind.
Jason Russell
yes..
Evan Hill
No, you should reas SCIENCE OF LOGIC first. It is his most essential text aa he himself cknsidered it.
Tyler Nelson
The Encylopedia contains the Shorter Logic.