Inb4 le edgy chantards say sexism in books is based
Inb4 le edgy chantards say sexism in books is based
Other urls found in this thread:
I can't stress enough just how much I hate women.
Imagine being such a snowflake that words are too scary
>incredible violence, psychological manipulation a-ok
>becomes unacceptable as soon as it's a race/gender thing
Reminds me of that John Green guy shitting on Aristotle for being problematic while praising Genghis Khan to high heavens, a warlord who would cut open the bellies of pregnant women to stab the fetus inside, and spread black plague to the west by catapulting the festering bodies of livestock over Baghdad's walls
>1984
>classic
(Well, she did put it in quotation marks)
You're like a hunter, venturing out into distant parts of cyberspace to bring back nuggets for us to get angry about. Pathetic.
>I want to study literature and the depths of human experience but imaginary rapey time is too much
What a dumb cunt.
Anyway,
>ruins the book
What the fuck does that even mean? Does she base her esteem of books on how much she enjoys them? Wow, what an intellectual.
That's what I think bothers me most as well. I've seen people on Yea Forums of all places using terms like "the n-bomb".
Every time I read a 19th century classic I yearn for the days where women were bought and sold by fathers for marriage. It was a happier time.
>a screenshot of an instagram post that is itself a screenshot of a tweet
PEAK
>young women's
Ageist and sexist. We are to scoff at the elderly or men also taking issue with this?
>criticism of the violent [why the brackets?] misogyny in [rabbit ears] classic lit
Criticising violence and/or misogyny is a platitude. Can you imagine the reality of this? "There is domestic abuse in this book, and I believe it is wrong, immoral", it at best sounds like a psychopath trying to get a reading on what normal societal morals are. Criticise the literature itself.
>rapey overtones
>ruin the whole book for her
That's toxic and abusive language. Don't go on about vagueries like the tone of things, it's a character flaw.
>this goes double
So 200%
Also no rabbit ears so the second classics.
based
>I meet an older guy at work
>he’s based, just great guy, pleasure to work with, we get on great
>realize that in an older age I would ask him to give me his daughter and he’d say yes and everything would just work out great
It’s an abstract kind of feel.
based. quiet though, they dont understand the karmic backfire aspect of this
>ever taking the opinions of young women seriously
They're Chapo trannies that stayed after the Zizek Peterson debate
peak pain
>making decisions based on emotion over reason
>not not-intellectual
>on a literature board
>doesn't recognize the power of words
>cellphone image
>instagram
Get out.
>don't critically engage, just avoid!
>this is in no way not perfectly intellectual
>"I haven't read this book, but I know it's evil!"
>DAS RITE LAQUANDASHAWNDA DEEZ WHYPIPO FITTIN TO TRYIN'T' FITTIN'T' HAVE WHY'S'PREMCY N MISOG'KNEE IN BOOGS 'GAIN
STOP WITH THE NON-FEMALE GREEKS!!!!!
youtu.be
(45:05)
You should know that it’s poor form to inb4 as op.