Are there any good arguements against empiricism?

Are there any good arguements against empiricism?

Attached: 823.png (426x364, 29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checker_shadow_illusion
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Rationalism

take cocaine then tell me your senses are reliable and legit

ITT: christfag cope

plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/

Yeah but is there any way to say that our senses, when we're not affected by some substance that specifically alter our perception, is unreliable?

tell me how you know cocaine affects your senses without using your senses

Our senses are the only thing we have. Reasoning itself is done by the senses.

We can't know anything conclusively through repeated observation because we never know when our observations are going to change. You can't say conclusively that an object you drop will fall to the ground, maybe it will be the first object ever to defy Newtonian physics and float up into the sky instead.

Does anyone know what this argument is called?