>Hmm, that's an interesting philosophy, but i wonder... Can you Prove it? I mean, do you have any proof of your assertions? Can you provide any proof AT ALL of your beliefs?
>w-what do you mean prove it man, like we can't know nothing...
And thus the philosopher gets BTFO. It's so easy! Just ask them the magical two words: Prove It! and see how they recoil, see how injured they are "i've been found out". Charlatans!
Hmm, that's an interesting philosophy, but i wonder... Can you Prove it? I mean...
>mfw I simply respond, "I may not be able to prove it, but can you disprove it?"
prove it! prove that this will actually BTFO them and not make them present the proof.
Any proof presupposes a set of axioms which cannot be proven but are simply taken as true.
Proof? Suppose that wasn't the case. Any proposition would be derived from any simpler propositions which itself must be derived from even simpler propositions. If there were no axioms on which those propositions ultimately rely any proposition must be the result of infinitely many derivations of earlier propositions. That is, any proposition by means of elementary logics is infinitely complex which is absurd.
>Any proof presupposes a set of axioms which cannot be proven but are simply taken as true.
user, i...
Prove it.
even if everything provable were to be proven, the problems of life have still not been touched at all
>Prove it.
No
btfo, OP correct again
I already gave a preliminary proof to the above statement in the comment. Obviously you can question that too by claiming that its underlying assumptions must also be proven. There are however only two such assumptions. First, that such a thing like a proof exists and secondly, that there are no infinitely complex things.
yfw anti-philosophism is a philosophy