Who was more important?

Who was more important?

Attached: 1.jpg (715x450, 104K)

Both disproved by science

Kant, Aristotle could be forgotten and we would be car better off

Science is physical reality it doesn't deal w metaphysical reality, reality is a dualism between the two

metaphysical reality doesnt exist

>one of the few Westerners to actually approach proper Metaphysics
vs
>top westernlet who tries to impose the limitations of his mind on everyone else

cringe

>"kant was a brainlet compared to aristotle"
Don't do empiricism, kids.

Do you objectively believe that to be true?

Kant objectively developed a stronger metaphysical structure than Aristotle. Aristotle refused half of Metaphysics (hierarchy or up and down). The analytic synthetic divide opened so much for us. If you just expand left to right you get nihilistic distinctions that resolve themselves into medieval philosophy. You can't find truth without aiming up. The, unfinished, works of Kant, such as the Categorical Imperative, are very close to the structure we need.

Aristotle but Kant is better.

Kant was more important

I can't take Kant seriously after finding out about his height. Everything I read from him I translate to pure cope.

>Aristotle
>Best philosopher of all time
>2000 years after his death, science (that he developed like no one else) is going back towards his philosophy
>Kant
>Ok philosopher
>His readers don't understand shit and fucked all philosophy after his existence
>Literally a goblin

Aristotle but who cares

name a SINGLE thing kant has actually done

philosophy

Kant did more but it gave less substance.
Aristotle did less but it gave more substance.

Made Yea Forums mad

>SCIENCE

Attached: 1561602959989.jpg (318x306, 38K)

>Both disproved by science

Attached: 1561723340273.jpg (542x475, 63K)

Kant is unironically the prussian reincarnation of Aristotle with the philosophy dichotomies and anthropology in place of zoology.
based

Aristotle founded science

>who were the Pre-Socratics?

Aristotle, he still lives through his Scholastic Abrahamic continuator to this very day. Whereas German Idealism not even Kantianism only lives through Marxists.

Me

Who?

You

That's a metaphysical claim you retard

lmao manlets btfo

made a woman kill herself

mad lad

Aristotle did way more in establishing it in actuality until Francis Bacon

Hi guys are we playing a game here

Aristotle:
>logic
>biology
>political theory
Sadly also
>literary theory

Kant:
>Causality is all on the mind, *&* noumena cause phenomena

You know who wins.

Attached: imagesBS2281KB.jpg (294x171, 10K)

Guenon

>Sadly also literary theory
>Sadly
???

Attached: 36EB9E73-9079-4833-9EA1-5884BF7BCDC9.jpg (540x813, 134K)

T. Hasn't read kant

Kant established a good metaphysical structure to work from (which opened up many paths to operate from, the analytic opens up dialecticism which led to Darwin's evolution theory). He also established an objective aesthetics from a priori reasoning as well as ethics, it being way more evolved than wat Aristotle adopted from general Greek consensus.

They're both important but kant definitely went the mile farther if only by nature of having been given a mile headstart