>he doesn’t write his philosophy in form of mathematics
He doesn’t write his philosophy in form of mathematics
Any systematic rigorous thought can be considered mathematics.
Pleb
Imagine being this retarded
t. dumbfuck who can't understand both philosophy and mathematics, making use of arguments from either one to prove stuff the other
Based Goedelposter
Fool! The noumenon won’t be rigid to our a priori forms (i.e. the only thing we know for certain the noumenon will be lacking is our imposed forms of thinking) so I specifically avoid anything apodictic, especially mathematics. If we want to rech the noumenon we have to find true epistemology such as beauty, telos and (perhaps) morality since they are all transcendental, which infuriates the stemfag.
How exactly am I supposed to use mathematics to prove that free will is non-existent
Stop being a brainlet
>I wanna say lies that nobody will ever be able to refute
read up some set theory and formal logic, homo