ITT: Yea Forums that answers this question

ITT: Yea Forums that answers this question

Attached: monster_8_9.jpg (469x522, 86K)

Because he's a pussy.

Schopenhauer's ethics

The Bible

You have the burden of proof. Your conclusion is:
I can kill people.
Now provide me the premises that you used to come to this conclusion. I also want truthtables and the rules of inference you used to come to this conclusion, if you can't do this, then you are a retarded brainlet.

you can only if god wants you to

You couldn't kill people even if you had to you fucking faggot.

Wow a fallacious argument. Do you have anything that is a rational argument?

This is dumb. No ethical system works on the assumption that every action is forbidden until proven permissible.

That is rational. You are a pussy and have probably never killed an animal or gotten into a fight. You wouldn't be able to kill a man if you had to. You probably didn't even kill small animals for fun in your adolescence and see what their insides looked like.

You don't have the mental fortitude it takes to kill.

Make a tripfag already monster poster

Crime and Punishment

it hurts my feefees

Attached: 61xMaE669gL.jpg (1197x1796, 120K)

The Revolutionary Catechism
Just kidding, if you have to ask then start at The Stranger.

Attached: T01473_10.jpg (1536x673, 81K)

>The Stranger
>literally a book about someone who kills a guy and doesnt give a fuck

*pulls trigger and kills you*

It’s an interesting situation because he’s referring to himself as representing all people. He can’t say “you can’t kill me” because that’s not what’s going on. He is addressing what this idiot has forgotten, that he belongs to people, and that he would be inherently long against himself in this act. He’s not telling what to do, he’s telling him what he can’t do, what he won’t do. “You can’t kill people”. By speaking from this plane of awareness he has already ascended, and speaking from in high to the valley below, with voice of God, he affirms the commands of righteousness in the face of death.

What is expedient, will pass for my truth and morality. I am my own God and everything is as I perceive. Therefore, toma plomo, hijueputa.

>"i want books about responding with a careless 'why not' when told you can't kill people"
>"wait not a book about someone who kills a guy and doesn't give a fuck"

Because you will be punished by the law which you have agreed on by abiding in the country. If you want to have your own laws then you are free to go throw yourself into the middle of the ocean.

I can't, he isn't spooked.

Attached: 110d2e693c9d0a0c86bde5e62fefbea9_XL.jpg (900x1067, 268K)

>Now provide me the premises that you used to come to this conclusion.
My ability to kill people since I exercise and eat right? Wow, that was hard.

There is no surgeon on earth that would act as naive and selfless as Tenma, they are all scum of the earth

Attached: 1485153448880.jpg (600x418, 85K)

Rights don't exist. Nature doesn't grant anything unalienable.

killing people is a spook.

Sorry Lucifer I chose to transform the instinct if destruction into something better.

P = I want to kill someone
Q = It is morally permissible for me to kill that someone.
1) P->Q
2) P
: Q
You see user, since P is true (upper two columns) and P->Q is true (all columns but the second one), then it is impossible for Q to be false.

Attached: truth-tables18.png (199x128, 2K)

Lol, whoops

>Can he?
Yes
>Should he?
Depends

You mean
>Can he?
Yes
>Should he?
Depends
>Ought he?
No

What is the military?

An instrument of capital interests.